sample size
Latest
Fidelity and Replication: Modelling the Impact of Protocol Deviations on Effect Size
Cognitive science and cognitive neuroscience researchers have agreed that the replication of findings is important for establishing which ideas (or theories) are integral to the study of cognition across the lifespan. Recently, high-profile papers have called into question findings that were once thought to be unassailable. Much attention has been paid to how p-hacking, publication bias, and sample size are responsible for failed replications. However, much less attention has been paid to the fidelity by which researchers enact study protocols. Researchers conducting education or clinical trials are aware of the importance in fidelity – or the extent to which the protocols are delivered in the same way across participants. Nevertheless, this idea has not been applied to cognitive contexts. This seminar discusses factors that impact the replicability of findings alongside recent models suggesting that even small fidelity deviations have real impacts on the data collected.
NMC4 Short Talk: What can 140,000 Reaches Tell Us About Demographic Contributions to Visuomotor Adaptation?
Motor learning is typically assessed in the lab, affording a high degree of control over the task environment. However, this level of control often comes at the cost of smaller sample sizes and a homogenous pool of participants (e.g. college students). To address this, we have designed a web-based motor learning experiment, making it possible to reach a larger, more diverse set of participants. As a proof-of-concept, we collected 1,581 participants completing a visuomotor rotation task, where participants controlled a visual cursor on the screen with their mouse and trackpad. Motor learning was indexed by how fast participants were able to compensate for a 45° rotation imposed between the cursor and their actual movement. Using a cross-validated LASSO regression, we found that motor learning varied significantly with the participant’s age and sex, and also strongly correlated with the location of the target, visual acuity, and satisfaction with the experiment. In contrast, participants' mouse and browser type were features eliminated by the model, indicating that motor performance was not influenced by variations in computer hardware and software. Together, this proof-of-concept study demonstrates how large datasets can generate important insights into the factors underlying motor learning.
sample size coverage
2 items