Our first NeurotechEU Summit will be fully digital and will take place on November 22th from 09:00 to 17:00 (CET). The final programme can be downloaded here. Hosted by the Karolinska Institutet, the summit will provide you an overview of our actions and achievements from the last year and introduce the priorities for the next year. You will also have the opportunity to attend the finals of the 3 minute thesis competition (3MT) organized by the Synapses Student Society, the student charter of NeurotechEU. Good luck to all the finalists: Lynn Le, Robin Noordhof, Adriana Gea González, Juan Carranza Valencia, Lea van Husen, Guoming (Tony) Man, Lilly Pitshaporn Leelaarporn, Cemre Su, Kaya Keleş, Ramazan Tarık Türksoy, Cristiana Tisca, Sara Bandiera, Irina Maria Vlad, Iulia Vadan, Borbála László, and David Papp! Don’t miss our keynote lecture, success stories and interactive discussions with Ms Vanessa Debiais Sainton (Head of Higher Education Unit, European Commission), Prof. Staffan Holmin (Karolinska Institutet), Dr Mohsen Kaboli (BMW Group, member of the NeurotechEU Associates Advisory Committee), and Prof. Peter Hagoort (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Donders Institute). Would you like to use this opportunity to network? Please join our informal breakout sessions on Wonder.me at 11:40 CET. You will be able to move from one discussion group to another within 3 sessions: NeurotechEU ecosystem - The Associates Advisory Committee: Synergies in cross-sectoral initiatives Education next: Trans-European education and the European Universities Initiatives - Lessons learned thus far. Equality, diversity and inclusion at NeurotechEU: removing access barriers to education and developing a working, learning, and social environment where everyone is respected and valued. You can register for this free event at www.crowdcast.io/e/neurotecheu-summit

Did we eat spaghetti for lunch because we saw our colleague eat spaghetti? What drives a risk decision? How can our breakfast impact our decisions throughout the day? Research from different disciplines such as economics, psychology and neuroscience have attempted to investigate the motives and modulators of human decision making. Human decisions can be flexibly modulated by the different experiences we have in our daily lives, at the same time, bodily processes, such as metabolism can also impact economic behavior. These modulations can occur through our social networks, through the impact of our own behavior on the social environment, but also simply by the food we have eaten. Here, I will present a series of recent studies from my lab in which we shed light on the psychological, neural and metabolic motives and modulators of human decision making.

Our work concerns the general problem of adaptive behaviour in response to predatory threats, and of the neural mechanisms underlying a choice between strategies. When faced with a threat, an animal must decide whether to freeze, reducing its chances of being noticed, or to flee to the safety of a refuge. Animals from fish to primates choose between these two alternatives when confronted by an attacking predator, a choice that largely depends on the context in which the threat occurs. Recent work has made strides identifying the pre-motor circuits, and their inputs, which control freezing behaviour in rodents, but how contextual information is integrated to guide this choice is still far from understood. The social environment is a potent contextual modulator of defensive behaviours of animals in a group. Indeed, anti-predation strategies are believed to be a major driving force for the evolution of sociality. We recently found that fruit flies in response to visual looming stimuli, simulating a large object on collision course, make rapid freeze/flee choices accompanied by lasting changes in the fly’s internal state, reflected in altered cardiac activity. In this talk, I will discuss our work on how flies process contextual cues, focusing on the social environment, to guide their behavioural response to a threat. We have identified a social safety cue, resumption of activity, and visual projection neurons involved in processing this cue. Given the knowledge regarding sensory detection of looming threats and descending neuron involved in the expression of freezing, we are now in a unique position to understand how information about a threat is integrated with cues from the social environment to guide the choice of whether to freeze.