Neuronal plasticity has for a long time been considered important for the recovery from depression and for the antidepressant drug action, but how the drug action is translated to plasticity has remained unclear. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its receptor TRKB are critical regulators of neuronal plasticity and have been implicated in the antidepressant action. We have recently found that many, if not all, different antidepressants, including serotonin selective SSRIs, tricyclic as well as fast-acting ketamine, directly bind to TRKB, thereby promoting TRKB translocation to synaptic membranes, which increases BDNF signaling. We have previously shown that antidepressant treatment induces a juvenile-like state of activity in the cortex that facilitates beneficial rewiring of abnormal networks. We recently showed that activation of TRKB receptors in parvalbumin-containing interneurons orchestrates cortical activation states and is both necessary and sufficient for the antidepressantinduced cortical plasticity. Our findings open a new framework how the action of antidepressants act: rather than regulating brain monoamine concentrations, antidepressants directly bind to TRKB and allosterically promote BDNF signaling, thereby inducing a state of plasticity that allows re-wiring of abnormal networks for better functionality.

Uncertainty regarding which psychological mechanisms are fundamental in mediating SSRI treatment outcomes and wide-ranging variability in their efficacy has raised more questions than it has solved. Since subjective mood states are an abstract scientific construct, only available through self-report in humans, and likely involving input from multiple top-down and bottom-up signals, it has been difficult to model at what level SSRIs interact with this process. Converging translational evidence indicates a role for serotonin in modulating context-dependent parameters of action selection, affect, and social cognition; and concurrently supporting learning mechanisms, which promote adaptability and behavioural flexibility. We examine the theoretical basis, ecological validity, and interaction of these constructs and how they may or may not exert a clinical benefit. Specifically, we bridge crucial gaps between disparate lines of research, particularly findings from animal models and human clinical trials, which often seem to present irreconcilable differences. In determining how SSRIs exert their effects, our approach examines the endogenous functions of 5-HT neurons, how 5-HT manipulations affect behaviour in different contexts, and how their therapeutic effects may be exerted in humans – which may illuminate issues of translational models, hierarchical mechanisms, idiographic variables, and social cognition.

A long-term treatment with antidepressants reduces the risk to develop AD and different second-generation antidepressants such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are currently studied for their neuroprotective properties in AD. An impairment of neurotrophic factors signaling seems to be a common pathophysiological event in depression and AD. In particular a deficit of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and increased oxidative stress have been found both in depression and AD. In the present work the SSRI fluoxetine and the new multimodal antidepressant vortioxetine were tested for their ability to prevent memory deficits and depressive-like phenotype in a non-transgenic mouse model of AD (i.c.v. Aβ1-42 injection) by rescue of TGF-β1 signaling. The same drugs were also tested for their ability to modulate the expression of pro-oxidant genes as well as of genes related to the antioxidant machinery.