suprachiasmatic nucleus
Latest
Identifying central mechanisms of glucocorticoid circadian rhythm dysfunction in breast cancer
The circadian release of endogenous glucocorticoids is essential in preparing and synchronizing the body’s daily physiological needs. Disruption in the rhythmic activity of glucocorticoids has been observed in individuals with a variety of cancer types, and blunting of this rhythm has been shown to predict cancer mortality and declines in quality of life. This suggests that a disrupted glucocorticoid rhythm is potentially a shared phenotype across cancers. However, where this phenomenon is driven by the cancer itself, and the causal mechanisms that link glucocorticoid rhythm dysfunction and cancer outcomes remain preliminary at best. The regulation of daily glucocorticoid activity has been well-characterized and is maintained, in part, by the coordinated response of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, consisting of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and corticotropin-releasing hormone-expressing neurons of the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVNCRH). Consequently, we set out to examine if cancer-induced glucocorticoid dysfunction is regulated by disruptions within these hypothalamic nuclei. In comparison to their tumor-free baseline, mammary tumor-bearing mice exhibited a blunting of glucocorticoid rhythms across multiple timepoints throughout the day, as measured by the overall levels and the slope of fecal corticosterone rhythms, during tumor progression. We further examined how peripheral tumors shape hypothalamic activity within the brain. Serial two-photon tomography for whole-brain cFos imaging suggests a disrupted activation of the PVN in mice with tumors. Additionally, we found GFP labeled CRH+ neurons within the PVN after injection of pseudorabies virus expressing GFP into the tumor, pointing to the PVN as a primary target disrupted by mammary tumors. Preliminary in vivo fiber photometry data show that PVNCRH neurons exhibit enhanced calcium activity during tumor progression, as compared to baseline (no tumor) activity. Taken together, this suggests that there may be an overactive HPA response during tumor progression, which in turn, may result in a subsequent negative feedback on glucocorticoid rhythms. Current studies are examining whether tumor progression modulates SCN calcium activity, how the transcriptional profile of PVNCRH neurons is changed, and test if manipulation of the neurocircuitry surrounding glucocorticoid rhythmicity alters tumor characteristics.
A draft connectome for ganglion cell types of the mouse retina
The visual system of the brain is highly parallel in its architecture. This is clearly evident in the outputs of the retina, which arise from neurons called ganglion cells. Work in our lab has shown that mammalian retinas contain more than a dozen distinct types of ganglion cells. Each type appears to filter the retinal image in a unique way and to relay this processed signal to a specific set of targets in the brain. My students and I are working to understand the meaning of this parallel organization through electrophysiological and anatomical studies. We record from light-responsive ganglion cells in vitro using the whole-cell patch method. This allows us to correlate directly the visual response properties, intrinsic electrical behavior, synaptic pharmacology, dendritic morphology and axonal projections of single neurons. Other methods used in the lab include neuroanatomical tracing techniques, single-unit recording and immunohistochemistry. We seek to specify the total number of ganglion cell types, the distinguishing characteristics of each type, and the intraretinal mechanisms (structural, electrical, and synaptic) that shape their stimulus selectivities. Recent work in the lab has identified a bizarre new ganglion cell type that is also a photoreceptor, capable of responding to light even when it is synaptically uncoupled from conventional (rod and cone) photoreceptors. These ganglion cells appear to play a key role in resetting the biological clock. It is just this sort of link, between a specific cell type and a well-defined behavioral or perceptual function, that we seek to establish for the full range of ganglion cell types. My research concerns the structural and functional organization of retinal ganglion cells, the output cells of the retina whose axons make up the optic nerve. Ganglion cells exhibit great diversity both in their morphology and in their responses to light stimuli. On this basis, they are divisible into a large number of types (>15). Each ganglion-cell type appears to send its outputs to a specific set of central visual nuclei. This suggests that ganglion cell heterogeneity has evolved to provide each visual center in the brain with pre-processed representations of the visual scene tailored to its specific functional requirements. Though the outline of this story has been appreciated for some time, it has received little systematic exploration. My laboratory is addressing in parallel three sets of related questions: 1) How many types of ganglion cells are there in a typical mammalian retina and what are their structural and functional characteristics? 2) What combination of synaptic networks and intrinsic membrane properties are responsible for the characteristic light responses of individual types? 3) What do the functional specializations of individual classes contribute to perceptual function or to visually mediated behavior? To pursue these questions, we label retinal ganglion cells by retrograde transport from the brain; analyze in vitro their light responses, intrinsic membrane properties and synaptic pharmacology using the whole-cell patch clamp method; and reveal their morphology with intracellular dyes. Recently, we have discovered a novel ganglion cell in rat retina that is intrinsically photosensitive. These ganglion cells exhibit robust light responses even when all influences from classical photoreceptors (rods and cones) are blocked, either by applying pharmacological agents or by dissociating the ganglion cell from the retina. These photosensitive ganglion cells seem likely to serve as photoreceptors for the photic synchronization of circadian rhythms, the mechanism that allows us to overcome jet lag. They project to the circadian pacemaker of the brain, the suprachiasmatic nucleus of the hypothalamus. Their temporal kinetics, threshold, dynamic range, and spectral tuning all match known properties of the synchronization or "entrainment" mechanism. These photosensitive ganglion cells innervate various other brain targets, such as the midbrain pupillary control center, and apparently contribute to a host of behavioral responses to ambient lighting conditions. These findings help to explain why circadian and pupillary light responses persist in mammals, including humans, with profound disruption of rod and cone function. Ongoing experiments are designed to elucidate the phototransduction mechanism, including the identity of the photopigment and the nature of downstream signaling pathways. In other studies, we seek to provide a more detailed characterization of the photic responsiveness and both morphological and functional evidence concerning possible interactions with conventional rod- and cone-driven retinal circuits. These studies are of potential value in understanding and designing appropriate therapies for jet lag, the negative consequences of shift work, and seasonal affective disorder.
Why is the suprachiasmatic nucleus such a brilliant circadian time-keeper?
Circadian clocks dominate our lives. By creating and distributing an internal representation of 24-hour solar time, they prepare us, and thereby adapt us, to the daily and seasonal world. Jet-lag is an obvious indicator of what can go wrong when such adaptation is disrupted acutely. More seriously, the growing prevalence of rotational shift-work which runs counter to our circadian life, is a significant chronic challenge to health, presenting as increased incidence of systemic conditions such as metabolic and cardiovascular disease. Added to this, circadian and sleep disturbances are a recognised feature of various neurological and psychiatric conditions, and in some cases may contribute to disease progression. The “head ganglion” of the circadian system is the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus. It synchronises the, literally, innumerable cellular clocks across the body, to each other and to solar time. Isolated in organotypic slice culture, it can maintain precise, high-amplitude circadian cycles of neural activity, effectively, indefinitely, just as it does in vivo. How is this achieved: how does this clock in a dish work? This presentation will consider SCN time-keeping at the level of molecular feedback loops, neuropeptidergic networks and neuron-astrocyte interactions.
The circadian clock and neural circuits maintaining body fluid homeostasis
Neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN, the brain’s master circadian clock) display a 24 hour cycle in the their rate of action potential discharge whereby firing rates are high during the light phase and lower during the dark phase. Although it is generally agreed that this cycle of activity is a key mediator of the clock’s neural and humoral output, surprisingly little is known about how changes in clock electrical activity can mediate scheduled physiological changes at different times of day. Using opto- and chemogenetic approaches in mice we have shown that the onset of electrical activity in vasopressin releasing SCN neurons near Zeitgeber time 22 (ZT22) activates glutamatergic thirst-promoting neurons in the OVLT (organum vasculosum lamina terminalis) to promote water intake prior to sleep. This effect is mediated by activity-dependent release of vasopressin from the axon terminals of SCN neurons which acts as a neurotransmitter on OVLT neurons. More recently we found that the clock receives excitatory input from a different subset of sodium sensing neurons in the OVLT. Activation of these neurons by a systemic salt load delivered at ZT19 stimulated the electrical activity of SCN neurons which are normally silent at this time. Remarkably, this effect induced an acute reduction in non-shivering thermogenesis and body temperature, which is an adaptive response to the salt load. These findings provide information regarding the mechanisms by which the SCN promotes scheduled physiological rhythms and indicates that the clock’s output circuitry can also be recruited to mediate an unscheduled homeostatic response.
The suprachiasmatic nucleus: the brain's circadian clock
Sleep and all of the other circadian rhythms that adapt us to the 24 hour world are controlled by the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the brain's central circadian clock. And yet, the SCN consists of only 20,000 neurons and astrocytes, so what makes it such a powerful clock, able to set the tempo to our lives? Professor Hastings will consider the cell-autonomus and neural circuit-level mechanisms that sustain the SCN clock and how it regulates rest, activity and sleep.
Impact of Alzheimer’s disease on non-visual light perception, suprachiasmatic nucleus connectivity, and sleep regulation
FENS Forum 2024
Communication between the suprachiasmatic nucleus and the subparaventricular zone of the hypothalamus
FENS Forum 2024
Feedback of blood corticosterone and glucose levels to the suprachiasmatic nucleus
FENS Forum 2024
suprachiasmatic nucleus coverage
8 items
Share your knowledge
Know something about suprachiasmatic nucleus? Help the community by contributing seminars, talks, or research.
Contribute contentExplore how suprachiasmatic nucleus research is advancing inside Neuroscience.
Visit domain