theoretical neuroscience

“Brain theory, what is it or what should it be?”

n the neurosciences the need for some 'overarching' theory is sometimes expressed, but it is not always obvious what is meant by this. One can perhaps agree that in modern science observation and experimentation is normally complemented by 'theory', i.e. the development of theoretical concepts that help guiding and evaluating experiments and measurements. A deeper discussion of 'brain theory' will require the clarification of some further distictions, in particular: theory vs. model and brain research (and its theory) vs. neuroscience. Other questions are: Does a theory require mathematics? Or even differential equations? Today it is often taken for granted that the whole universe including everything in it, for example humans, animals, and plants, can be adequately treated by physics and therefore theoretical physics is the overarching theory. Even if this is the case, it has turned out that in some particular parts of physics (the historical example is thermodynamics) it may be useful to simplify the theory by introducing additional theoretical concepts that can in principle be 'reduced' to more complex descriptions on the 'microscopic' level of basic physical particals and forces. In this sense, brain theory may be regarded as part of theoretical neuroscience, which is inside biophysics and therefore inside physics, or theoretical physics. Still, in neuroscience and brain research, additional concepts are typically used to describe results and help guiding experimentation that are 'outside' physics, beginning with neurons and synapses, names of brain parts and areas, up to concepts like 'learning', 'motivation', 'attention'. Certainly, we do not yet have one theory that includes all these concepts. So 'brain theory' is still in a 'pre-newtonian' state. However, it may still be useful to understand in general the relations between a larger theory and its 'parts', or between microscopic and macroscopic theories, or between theories at different 'levels' of description. This is what I plan to do.

The Brain Prize winners' webinar

This webinar brings together three leaders in theoretical and computational neuroscience—Larry Abbott, Haim Sompolinsky, and Terry Sejnowski—to discuss how neural circuits generate fundamental aspects of the mind. Abbott illustrates mechanisms in electric fish that differentiate self-generated electric signals from external sensory cues, showing how predictive plasticity and two-stage signal cancellation mediate a sense of self. Sompolinsky explores attractor networks, revealing how discrete and continuous attractors can stabilize activity patterns, enable working memory, and incorporate chaotic dynamics underlying spontaneous behaviors. He further highlights the concept of object manifolds in high-level sensory representations and raises open questions on integrating connectomics with theoretical frameworks. Sejnowski bridges these motifs with modern artificial intelligence, demonstrating how large-scale neural networks capture language structures through distributed representations that parallel biological coding. Together, their presentations emphasize the synergy between empirical data, computational modeling, and connectomics in explaining the neural basis of cognition—offering insights into perception, memory, language, and the emergence of mind-like processes.

Bernstein Student Workshop Series

The Bernstein Student Workshop Series is an initiative of the student members of the Bernstein Network. It provides a unique opportunity to enhance the technical exchange on a peer-to-peer basis. The series is motivated by the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental neuroscience by bringing together methodological expertise in the network. Unlike conventional workshops, a talented junior scientist will first give a tutorial about a specific theoretical or experimental technique, and then give a talk about their own research to demonstrate how the technique helps to address neuroscience questions. The workshop series is designed to cover a wide range of theoretical and experimental techniques and to elucidate how different techniques can be applied to answer different types of neuroscience questions. Combining the technical tutorial and the research talk, the workshop series aims to promote knowledge sharing in the community and enhance in-depth discussions among students from diverse backgrounds.

Bernstein Student Workshop Series

The Bernstein Student Workshop Series is an initiative of the student members of the Bernstein Network. It provides a unique opportunity to enhance the technical exchange on a peer-to-peer basis. The series is motivated by the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental neuroscience by bringing together methodological expertise in the network. Unlike conventional workshops, a talented junior scientist will first give a tutorial about a specific theoretical or experimental technique, and then give a talk about their own research to demonstrate how the technique helps to address neuroscience questions. The workshop series is designed to cover a wide range of theoretical and experimental techniques and to elucidate how different techniques can be applied to answer different types of neuroscience questions. Combining the technical tutorial and the research talk, the workshop series aims to promote knowledge sharing in the community and enhance in-depth discussions among students from diverse backgrounds.

Bernstein Student Workshop Series

The Bernstein Student Workshop Series is an initiative of the student members of the Bernstein Network. It provides a unique opportunity to enhance the technical exchange on a peer-to-peer basis. The series is motivated by the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental neuroscience by bringing together methodological expertise in the network. Unlike conventional workshops, a talented junior scientist will first give a tutorial about a specific theoretical or experimental technique, and then give a talk about their own research to demonstrate how the technique helps to address neuroscience questions. The workshop series is designed to cover a wide range of theoretical and experimental techniques and to elucidate how different techniques can be applied to answer different types of neuroscience questions. Combining the technical tutorial and the research talk, the workshop series aims to promote knowledge sharing in the community and enhance in-depth discussions among students from diverse backgrounds.

Bridging the gap between artificial models and cortical circuits

Artificial neural networks simplify complex biological circuits into tractable models for computational exploration and experimentation. However, the simplification of artificial models also undermines their applicability to real brain dynamics. Typical efforts to address this mismatch add complexity to increasingly unwieldy models. Here, we take a different approach; by reducing the complexity of a biological cortical culture, we aim to distil the essential factors of neuronal dynamics and plasticity. We leverage recent advances in growing neurons from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) to analyse ex vivo cortical cultures with only two distinct excitatory and inhibitory neuron populations. Over 6 weeks of development, we record from thousands of neurons using high-density microelectrode arrays (HD-MEAs) that allow access to individual neurons and the broader population dynamics. We compare these dynamics to two-population artificial networks of single-compartment neurons with random sparse connections and show that they produce similar dynamics. Specifically, our model captures the firing and bursting statistics of the cultures. Moreover, tightly integrating models and cultures allows us to evaluate the impact of changing architectures over weeks of development, with and without external stimuli. Broadly, the use of simplified cortical cultures enables us to use the repertoire of theoretical neuroscience techniques established over the past decades on artificial network models. Our approach of deriving neural networks from human cells also allows us, for the first time, to directly compare neural dynamics of disease and control. We found that cultures e.g. from epilepsy patients tended to have increasingly more avalanches of synchronous activity over weeks of development, in contrast to the control cultures. Next, we will test possible interventions, in silico and in vitro, in a drive for personalised approaches to medical care. This work starts bridging an important theoretical-experimental neuroscience gap for advancing our understanding of mammalian neuron dynamics.

Invariant neural subspaces maintained by feedback modulation

This session is a double feature of the Cologne Theoretical Neuroscience Forum and the Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6) Computational and Systems Neuroscience of the Jülich Research Center.

Flexible motor sequence generation by thalamic control of cortical dynamics through low-rank connectivity perturbations

One of the fundamental functions of the brain is to flexibly plan and control movement production at different timescales to efficiently shape structured behaviors. I will present a model that clarifies how these complex computations could be performed in the mammalian brain, with an emphasis on the learning of an extendable library of autonomous motor motifs and the flexible stringing of these motifs in motor sequences. To build this model, we took advantage of the fact that the anatomy of the circuits involved is well known. Our results show how these architectural constraints lead to a principled understanding of how strategically positioned plastic connections located within motif-specific thalamocortical loops can interact with cortical dynamics that are shared across motifs to create an efficient form of modularity. This occurs because the cortical dynamics can be controlled by the activation of as few as one thalamic unit, which induces a low-rank perturbation of the cortical connectivity, and significantly expands the range of outputs that the network can produce. Finally, our results show that transitions between any motifs can be facilitated by a specific thalamic population that participates in preparing cortex for the execution of the next motif. Taken together, our model sheds light on the neural network mechanisms that can generate flexible sequencing of varied motor motifs.

Parametric control of flexible timing through low-dimensional neural manifolds

Biological brains possess an exceptional ability to infer relevant behavioral responses to a wide range of stimuli from only a few examples. This capacity to generalize beyond the training set has been proven particularly challenging to realize in artificial systems. How neural processes enable this capacity to extrapolate to novel stimuli is a fundamental open question. A prominent but underexplored hypothesis suggests that generalization is facilitated by a low-dimensional organization of collective neural activity, yet evidence for the underlying neural mechanisms remains wanting. Combining network modeling, theory and neural data analysis, we tested this hypothesis in the framework of flexible timing tasks, which rely on the interplay between inputs and recurrent dynamics. We first trained recurrent neural networks on a set of timing tasks while minimizing the dimensionality of neural activity by imposing low-rank constraints on the connectivity, and compared the performance and generalization capabilities with networks trained without any constraint. We then examined the trained networks, characterized the dynamical mechanisms underlying the computations, and verified their predictions in neural recordings. Our key finding is that low-dimensional dynamics strongly increases the ability to extrapolate to inputs outside of the range used in training. Critically, this capacity to generalize relies on controlling the low-dimensional dynamics by a parametric contextual input. We found that this parametric control of extrapolation was based on a mechanism where tonic inputs modulate the dynamics along non-linear manifolds in activity space while preserving their geometry. Comparisons with neural recordings in the dorsomedial frontal cortex of macaque monkeys performing flexible timing tasks confirmed the geometric and dynamical signatures of this mechanism. Altogether, our results tie together a number of previous experimental findings and suggest that the low-dimensional organization of neural dynamics plays a central role in generalizable behaviors.

Theory of recurrent neural networks – from parameter inference to intrinsic timescales in spiking networks

Finding the needle in the haystack – Functional circuit and network models for neuroscience

Start of the talk will be 17:15h (CEST). This session is a double feature of the Cologne Theoretical Neuroscience Forum and the BCCN Berlin.

Generalizing theories of cerebellum-like learning

Since the theories of Marr, Ito, and Albus, the cerebellum has provided an attractive well-characterized model system to investigate biological mechanisms of learning. In recent years, theories have been developed that provide a normative account for many features of the anatomy and function of cerebellar cortex and cerebellum-like systems, including the distribution of parallel fiber-Purkinje cell synaptic weights, the expansion in neuron number of the granule cell layer and their synaptic in-degree, and sparse coding by granule cells. Typically, these theories focus on the learning of random mappings between uncorrelated inputs and binary outputs, an assumption that may be reasonable for certain forms of associative conditioning but is also quite far from accounting for the important role the cerebellum plays in the control of smooth movements. I will discuss in-progress work with Marjorie Xie, Samuel Muscinelli, and Kameron Decker Harris generalizing these learning theories to correlated inputs and general classes of smooth input-output mappings. Our studies build on earlier work in theoretical neuroscience as well as recent advances in the kernel theory of wide neural networks. They illuminate the role of pre-expansion structures in processing input stimuli and the significance of sparse granule cell activity. If there is time, I will also discuss preliminary work with Jack Lindsey extending these theories beyond cerebellum-like structures to recurrent networks.

Neural network models – analysis of their spontaneous activity and their response to single-neuron stimulation