Changes in the geometry and topology of self-assembled membranes underlie diverse processes across cellular biology and engineering. Similar to lipid bilayers, monolayer colloidal membranes studied by the Sharma (IISc Bangalore) and Dogic (UCSB) Labs have in-plane fluid-like dynamics and out-of-plane bending elasticity, but their open edges and micron length scale provide a tractable system to study the equilibrium energetics and dynamic pathways of membrane assembly and reconfiguration. First, we discuss how doping colloidal membranes with short miscible rods transforms disk-shaped membranes into saddle-shaped minimal surfaces with complex edge structures. Theoretical modeling demonstrates that their formation is driven by increasing positive Gaussian modulus, which in turn is controlled by the fraction of short rods. Further coalescence of saddle-shaped surfaces leads to exotic topologically distinct structures, including shapes similar to catenoids, tri-noids, four-noids, and higher order structures. We then mathematically explore the mechanics of these catenoid-like structures subject to an external axial force and elucidate their intimate connection to two problems whose solutions date back to Euler: the shape of an area-minimizing soap film and the buckling of a slender rod under compression. A perturbation theory argument directly relates the tensions of membranes to the stability properties of minimal surfaces. We also investigate the effects of including a Gaussian curvature modulus, which, for small enough membranes, causes the axial force to diverge as the ring separation approaches its maximal value.

An equation of state is something you hear about in introductory thermodynamics, for example, the Ideal gas equation. The ideal gas equation relates the pressure, volume, and the number of particles of the gas, to its temperature, uniquely defining its state. This description is possible in physics when the system under investigation is in equilibrium or near equilibrium. In biology, a tissue is modeled as a fluid composed of cells. These cells are constantly interacting with each other through mechanical and chemical signaling, driving them far from equilibrium. Can an equation of state exist for such a messy interacting system? In this talk, I show that the presence of strong cell-cell interaction in tissues gives rise to a novel non-equilibrium, size-dependent surface tension, something unheard of for classical fluids. This surface tension, in turn, modifies the packing of cells inside the tissue generating a size-dependent density and pressure. Finally, we show that a combination of these non-equilibrium pressure and densities can yield an equation of state for biological tissues arbitrarily far from equilibrium. In the end, I discuss how this new paradigm of size-dependent biological properties gives rise to novel modes of cellular motion in tissues

The vertebrate retina is an important outpost of the central nervous system, responsible for the perception and transmission of visual information. It consists of five different types of neurons that reproducibly laminate into three layers, a process of crucial importance for the organ’s function. Unsurprisingly, impaired fate decisions as well as impaired neuronal migrations and lamination lead to impaired retinal function. However, how processes are coordinated at the cellular and tissue level and how variable or robust retinal formation is, is currently still underexplored. In my lab, we aim to shed light on these questions from different angles, studying on the one hand differentiation phenomena and their variability and on the other hand the downstream migration and lamination phenomena. We use zebrafish as our main model system due to its excellent possibilities for live imaging and quantitative developmental biology. More recently we also started to use human retinal organoids as a comparative system. We further employ cross disciplinary approaches to address these issues combining work of cell and developmental biology, biomechanics, theory and computer science. Together, this allows us to integrate cell with tissue-wide phenomena and generate an appreciation of the reproducibility and variability of events.

Self-organization is a universal concept spanning numerous disciplines including mathematics, physics and biology. Chromosomes are self-organizing polymers that fold into orderly, hierarchical and yet dynamic structures. In the past decade, advances in experimental biology have provided a means to reveal information about chromosome connectivity, allowing us to directly use this information from experiments to generate 3D models of individual genes, chromosomes and even genomes. In this talk I will present a novel data-driven modeling approach and discuss a number of possibilities that this method holds. I will discuss a detailed study of the time-evolution of X chromosome inactivation, highlighting both global and local properties of chromosomes that result in topology-driven dynamical arrest and present and characterize a novel type of motion we discovered in knots that may have applications to nanoscale materials and machines.

The richness of active matter's spatiotemporal patterns continues to capture our imagination. Shaping these emergent dynamics into pre-determined forms of our choosing is a grand challenge in the field. To complicate matters, multiple dynamical attractors can coexist in such systems, leading to initial condition-dependent dynamics. Consequently, non-trivial spatiotemporal inputs are generally needed to access these states. Optimal control theory provides a general framework for identifying such inputs and represents a promising computational tool for guiding experiments and interacting with various systems in soft active matter and biology. As an exemplar, I first consider an extensile active nematic fluid confined to a disk. In the absence of control, the system produces two topological defects that perpetually circulate. Optimal control identifies a time-varying active stress field that restructures the director field, flipping the system to its other attractor that rotates in the opposite direction. As a second, analogous case, I examine a small network of coupled Belousov-Zhabotinsky chemical oscillators that possesses two dominant attractors, two wave states of opposing chirality. Optimal control similarly achieves the task of attractor switching. I conclude with a few forward-looking remarks on how the same model-based control approach might come to bear on problems in biology.

Macromolecular protein complexes perform essential biological functions across life forms. A fundamental, though yet unsolved question in biology is how the function of such complexes is regulated by intracellular or extracellular signals. For instance, we have little understanding of how forces affect multi-protein machines whose function is often mechanical in nature. We address this question by studying the bacterial flagellar motor, a large complex that powers swimming motility in many bacteria. This rotary motor autonomously adapts to changes in mechanical load by adding or removing force-generating ‘stator’ units that power rotation. In the bacterium Escherichia coli, up to 11 units drive the motor at high load while all the units are released at low load. We manipulate motor load using electrorotation, a technique in which a rapidly rotating electric field applies an external torque on the motor. This allows us to change motor load at will and measure the resulting stator dynamics at single-unit resolution. We found that the force generated by the stator units controls their unbinding, forming a feedback loop that leads to autoregulation of the assembly. We complemented our experiments with theoretical models that provide insight into the underlying molecular interactions. Torque-dependent remodeling takes place within seconds, making it a highly responsive control mechanism, one that is mediated by the mechano-chemical tuning of protein interactions.

A key question for basic biology and regenerative medicine concerns the way in which evolution exploits physics toward adaptive form and function. While genomes specify the molecular hardware of cells, what algorithms enable cellular collectives to reliably build specific, complex, target morphologies? Our lab studies the way in which all cells, not just neurons, communicate as electrical networks that enable scaling of single-cell properties into collective intelligences that solve problems in anatomical feature space. By learning to read, interpret, and write bioelectrical information in vivo, we have identified some novel controls of growth and form that enable incredible plasticity and robustness in anatomical homeostasis. In this talk, I will describe the fundamental knowledge gaps with respect to anatomical plasticity and pattern control beyond emergence, and discuss our efforts to understand large-scale morphological control circuits. I will show examples in embryogenesis, regeneration, cancer, and synthetic living machines. I will also discuss the implications of this work for not only regenerative medicine, but also for fundamental understanding of the origin of bodyplans and the relationship between genomes and functional anatomy.

This conference is a free event that includes a range of activities to stimulate the cross-fertilization of ideas, including invited speaker talks, workshops, micro talks, an undergraduate research competition, a contest to discover mathematical questions in biology, and plenty of networking opportunities. Today's speakers: Cassandra Extavour, William Bialek, Amy Shyer, Ankur Saxena, Jie Liang

This conference is a free event that includes a range of activities to stimulate the cross-fertilization of ideas, including invited speaker talks, workshops, micro talks, an undergraduate research competition, a contest to discover mathematical questions in biology, and plenty of networking opportunities. Today's speakers: Nathalie Dostatni, Christopher Obara, Hernan Garcia, Aaron Dinner, David Lubensky, Jianping Fu

Powerful new ways to image the internal structures and complex dynamics of cells are revolutionizing cell biology and bio-medical research. In this talk, I will focus on how emerging fluorescent technologies are increasing spatio-temporal resolution dramatically, permitting simultaneous multispectral imaging of multiple cellular components. In addition, results will be discussed from whole cell milling using Focused Ion Beam Electron Microscopy (FIB-SEM), which reconstructs the entire cell volume at 4 voxel resolution. Using these tools, it is now possible to begin constructing an “organelle interactome”, describing the interrelationships of different cellular organelles as they carry out critical functions. The same tools are also revealing new properties of organelles and their trafficking pathways, and how disruptions of their normal functions due to genetic mutations may contribute to important diseases.

It is sometimes said that there are two reasons why physics is so successful as a science. One is that it deals with very simple problems. The other is that it attempts to account only for universal aspects of systems at a desired level of description, with lower level phenomena subsumed into a small number of adjustable parameters. It is a widespread belief that this approach seems unlikely to be useful in biology, which is intimidatingly complex, where “everything has an exception”, and where there are a huge number of undetermined parameters. I will try to argue, nonetheless, that there are important, experimentally-testable aspects of biology that exhibit universality, and should be amenable to being tackled from a physics perspective. My suggestion is that this can lead to useful new insights into the existence and universal characteristics of living systems. I will try to justify this point of view by contrasting the goals and practices of the field of condensed matter physics with materials science, and then by extension, the goals and practices of the newly emerging field of “Physics of Living Systems” with biology. Specific biological examples that I will discuss include the following: Universal patterns of gene expression in cell biology Universal scaling laws in ecosystems, including the species-area law, Kleiber’s law, Paradox of the Plankton Universality of the genetic code Universality of thermodynamic utilization in microbial communities Universal scaling laws in the tree of life The question of what can be learned from studying universal phenomena in biology will also be discussed. Universal phenomena, by their very nature, shed little light on detailed microscopic levels of description. Yet there is no point in seeking idiosyncratic mechanistic explanations for phenomena whose explanation is found in rather general principles, such as the central limit theorem, that every microscopic mechanism is constrained to obey. Thus, physical perspectives may be better suited to answering certain questions such as universality than traditional biological perspectives. Concomitantly, it must be recognized that the identification and understanding of universal phenomena may not be a good answer to questions that have traditionally occupied biological scientists. Lastly, I plan to talk about what is perhaps the central question of universality in biology: why does the phenomenon of life occur at all? Is it an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics or some special geochemical accident? What methodology could even begin to answer this question? I will try to explain why traditional approaches to biology do not aim to answer this question, by comparing with our understanding of superconductivity as a physical phenomenon, and with the theory of universal computation. References Nigel Goldenfeld, Tommaso Biancalani, Farshid Jafarpour. Universal biology and the statistical mechanics of early life. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160341 (14 pages) (2017). Nigel Goldenfeld and Carl R. Woese. Life is Physics: evolution as a collective phenomenon far from equilibrium. Ann. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys. 2, 375-399 (2011).

The ability of the brain to encode and store information depends on the plastic nature of the individual synapses. The increase and decrease in synaptic strength, mediated through the structural plasticity of the spine, are important for learning, memory, and cognitive function. Dendritic spines are small structures that contain the synapse. They come in a variety of shapes (stubby, thin, or mushroom-shaped) and a wide range of sizes that protrude from the dendrite. These spines are the regions where the postsynaptic biochemical machinery responds to the neurotransmitters. Spines are dynamic structures, changing in size, shape, and number during development and aging. While spines and synapses have inspired neuromorphic engineering, the biophysical events underlying synaptic and structural plasticity of single spines remain poorly understood. Our current focus is on understanding the biophysical events underlying structural plasticity. I will discuss recent efforts from my group — first, a systems biology approach to construct a mathematical model of biochemical signaling and actin-mediated transient spine expansion in response to calcium influx caused by NMDA receptor activation and a series of spatial models to study the role of spine geometry and organelle location within the spine for calcium and cyclic AMP signaling. Second, I will discuss how mechanics of membrane-cytoskeleton interactions can give insight into spine shape region. And I will conclude with some new efforts in using reconstructions from electron microscopy to inform computational domains. I will conclude with how geometry and mechanics plays an important role in our understanding of fundamental biological phenomena and some general ideas on bio-inspired engineering.

Many of us came to biology from physics. There we have been trained on such classic examples as muon g-2, where experimental data and theoretical predictions agree to many significant digits. Now, working in biology, we routinely hear that it is messy, most details matter, and that the best hope for theory in biology is to be semi-qualitative, predict general trends, and to forgo the hope of ever making quantitative predictions with the precision that we are used to in physics. Colloquially, we should be satisfied even if data and models differ so much that plotting them on the same plot makes little sense. However, some of us won’t be satisfied by this. So can we take theory in biology seriously and predict experimental outcomes within (small) error bars? Certainly, we won’t be able to predict everything, but this is never required, even in traditional physics. But we should be able to choose some features of data that are nontrivial and interesting, and focus on them. We also should be able to find different classes of models --- maybe even null models --- that match biology better, and thus allow for a better agreement. It is even possible that large-dimensional datasets of modern high-throughput experiments, and the ensuing “more is different” statistical physics style models will make quantitative, precise theory easier. To explore the role of quantitative theory in biology, in this workshop, eight speakers will address some of the following general questions based on their specific work in different corners of biology: Which features of biological data are predictable? Which types of models are best suited to making quantitative predictions in different fields? Should theorists interested in quantitative predictions focus on different questions, not typically asked by biologists? Do large, multidimensional datasets make theories (and which theories?) more or less likely to succeed? This will be an unapologetically theoretical physics workshop — we won’t focus on a specific subfield of biology, but will explore these questions across the fields, hoping that the underlying theoretical frameworks will help us find the missing connections.

Most materials deform when external stresses are applied. This paradigm is familiar to sculptors who deform clay to produce structures. However, living materials such as cells and embryos are capable of deforming on their own. Contractile active gels of the proteins actin and myosin are one of the main drivers of force generation in biology. Here I will present experiments that characterize the length-scale behavior of active gel contraction, which find evidence for critical behavior. I will then present experiments that characterize the dynamics of active gel contraction, which identify dynamic precursors to contraction.

The ability to read the DNA sequences of different organisms has transformed biology in much the same way that the telescope transformed astronomy. And yet, much of the sequence found in these genomes is as enigmatic as the Rosetta Stone was to early Egyptologists. With the aim of making steps to crack the genomic Rosetta Stone, I will describe unexpected ways of using the physics of information transfer first developed at Bell Labs for thinking about telephone communications to try to decipher the meaning of the regulatory features of genomes. Specifically, I will show how we have been able to explore genes for which we know nothing about how they are regulated by using a combination of mutagenesis, deep sequencing and the physics of information, with the result that we now have falsifiable hypotheses about how those genes work. With those results in hand, I will show how simple tools from statistical physics can be used to predict the level of expression of different genes, followed by a description of precision measurements used to test those predictions. Bringing the two threads of the talk together, I will think about next steps in reading and writing genomes at will.

The “soft, active, and living matter” community has grown tremendously in recent years, conducting exciting research at the interface between soft matter and biological systems. But are all living systems also soft matter systems? Do the ideas of function (or purpose) in biological systems require us to introduce deep new ideas into the framework of soft matter theories? Does the (often) qualitatively different character of data in biological experiments require us to change the types of experiments we conduct and the goals of our theoretical treatments? Eight speakers will anchor the workshop, exploring these questions across a range of biological system scales. Each speaker will deliver a 10-minute talk with another 10 minutes set aside for moderated questions/discussion. We expect the talks to be broad, bold, and provocative, discussing both the nature of the theoretical tools and experimental techniques we have at present and also those we think we will ultimately need to answer deep questions at the interface of soft matter and biology.

Powerful new ways to image the internal structures and complex dynamics of cells are revolutionizing cell biology and bio-medical research. In this talk, I will focus on how emerging fluorescent technologies are increasing spatio-temporal resolution dramatically, permitting simultaneous multispectral imaging of multiple cellular components. In addition, results will be discussed from whole cell milling using Focused Ion Beam Electron Microscopy (FIB-SEM), which reconstructs the entire cell volume at 4 voxel resolution. Using these tools, it is now possible to begin constructing an “organelle interactome”, describing the interrelationships of different cellular organelles as they carry out critical functions. The same tools are also revealing new properties of organelles and their trafficking pathways, and how disruptions of their normal functions due to genetic mutations may contribute to important diseases.

The consortium of microbes living in and on our bodies is intimately connected with human biology and deeply influenced by physical forces. Despite incredible gains in describing this community, and emerging knowledge of the mechanisms linking it to human health, understanding the basic physical properties and responses of this ecosystem has been comparatively neglected. Most diseases have significant physical effects on the gut; diarrhea alters osmolality, fever and cancer increase temperature, and bowel diseases affect pH. Furthermore, the gut itself is comprised of localized niches that differ significantly in their physical environment, and are inhabited by different commensal microbes. Understanding the impact of common physical factors is necessary for engineering robust microbiota members and communities; however, our knowledge of how they affect the gut ecosystem is poor. We are investigating how changes in osmolality affect the host and the microbial community and lead to mechanical shifts in the cellular environment. Osmotic perturbation is extremely prevalent in humans, caused by the use of laxatives, lactose intolerance, or celiac disease. In our studies we monitored osmotic shock to the microbiota using a comprehensive and novel approach, which combined in vivo experiments to imaging, physical measurements, computational analysis and highly controlled microfluidic experiments. By bridging several disciplines, we developed a mechanistic understanding of the processes involved in osmotic diarrhea, linking single-cell biophysical changes to large-scale community dynamics. Our results indicate that physical perturbations can profoundly and permanently change the competitive and ecological landscape of the gut, and affect the cell wall of bacteria differentially, depending on their mechanical characteristics.