We have developed a robotic platform allowing us to monitor cytokines dynamics (including IL-2, IFN-g, TNF, IL-6) of immune cells in vitro, with unprecedented resolution. To understand the complex emerging dynamics, we use interpretable machine learning techniques to build a generative model of cytokine response. We discover that, surprisingly, immune activity is encoded into one global parameter, encoding ligand antigenic properties and to a less extent ligand quantity. Based on this we build a simple interpretable model which can fully explain the broad variability of cytokines dynamics. We validate our approach using different lines of cells and different ligands. Two processes are identified, connected to timing and intensity of cytokine response, which we successfully modulate using drugs or by changing conditions such as initial T cell numbers. Our work reveals a simple "cytokine code", which can be used to better understand immune response in different contexts including immunotherapy. More generally, it reveals how robotic platforms and machine learning can be leveraged to build and validate systems biology models.

There has been a surge of publications on using machine learning (ML) on experimental data from physical systems: social, biological, statistical, and quantum. However, can these methods discover fundamentally new physics? It can be that their biggest impact is in better data preprocessing, while inferring new physics is unrealistic without specifically adapting the learning machine to find what we are looking for — that is, without the “intuition” — and hence without having a good a priori guess about what we will find. Is machine learning a useful tool for physics discovery? Which minimal knowledge should we endow the machines with to make them useful in such tasks? How do we do this? Eight speakers below will anchor the workshop, exploring these questions in contexts of diverse systems (from quantum to biological), and from general theoretical advances to specific applications. Each speaker will deliver a 10 min talk with another 10 minutes set aside for moderated questions/discussion. We expect the talks to be broad, bold, and provocative, discussing where the field is heading, and what is needed to get us there.