Qualitative coding is the process of categorizing and labeling raw data to identify themes, patterns, and concepts within qualitative research. This process requires significant time, reflection, and discussion, often characterized by inherent subjectivity and uncertainty. Here, we explore the possibility to leverage large language models (LLM) to enhance the process and assist researchers with qualitative coding. LLMs, trained on extensive human-generated text, possess an architecture that renders them capable of understanding the broader context of a conversation or text. This allows them to extract patterns and meaning effectively, making them particularly useful for the accurate extraction and coding of relevant themes. In our current approach, we employed the chatGPT 3.5 Turbo API, integrating it into the qualitative coding process for data from the SWISS100 study, specifically focusing on data derived from centenarians' experiences during the Covid-19 pandemic, as well as a systematic centenarian literature review. We provide several instances illustrating how our approach can assist researchers with extracting and coding relevant themes. With data from human coders on hand, we highlight points of convergence and divergence between AI and human thematic coding in the context of these data. Moving forward, our goal is to enhance the prototype and integrate it within an LLM designed for local storage and operation (LLaMa). Our initial findings highlight the potential of AI-enhanced qualitative coding, yet they also pinpoint areas requiring attention. Based on these observations, we formulate tentative recommendations for the optimal integration of LLMs in qualitative coding research. Further evaluations using varied datasets and comparisons among different LLMs will shed more light on the question of whether and how to integrate these models into this domain.

The limited capacity of visual working memory constrains the quantity and quality of the information we can store in mind for ongoing processing. Research from our lab has demonstrated that verbal labeling/categorization of visual inputs increases its retention and fidelity in visual working memory. In this talk, I will outline the hypotheses that explain the interaction between visual and verbal inputs in working memory, leading to the boosts we observed. I will further show how manipulations of the categorical distinctiveness of the labels, the timing of their occurrence, to which item labels are applied, as well as their validity modulate the benefits one can draw from combining visual and verbal inputs to alleviate capacity limitations. Finally, I will discuss the implications of these results to our understanding of working memory and its interaction with prior knowledge.