The nature of facial information that is stored by humans to recognise large amounts of faces is unclear despite decades of research in the field. To complicate matters further, little is known about how representations may evolve as novel faces become familiar, and there are large individual differences in the ability to recognise faces. I will present a theory I am developing and that assumes that facial representations are cost-efficient. In that framework, individual facial representations would incorporate different diagnostic features in different faces, regardless of familiarity, and would evolve depending on the relative stability in appearance over time. Further, coarse information would be prioritised over fine details in order to decrease storage demands. This would create low-cost facial representations that refine over time if appearance changes. Individual differences could partly rest on that ability to refine representation if needed. I will present data collected in the general population and in participants with developmental prosopagnosia. In support of the proposed view, typical observers and those with developmental prosopagnosia seem to rely on coarse peripheral features when they have no reason to expect someone’s appearance will change in the future.

Face matching tests have traditionally been developed to assess human face perception in the neurotypical range, but methods that underlie their development often make it difficult for these measures to be applied in atypical populations (developmental prosopagnosics, super recognizers) due to unadjusted difficulty. We have recently presented the development of the Oxford Face Matching Test, a measure that bases individual item-difficulty on algorithmically derived similarity of presented stimuli. The measure seems useful as it can be given online or in-laboratory, has good discriminability and high test-retest reliability in the neurotypical groups. In addition, it has good validity in separating atypical groups at either of the spectrum ends. In this talk, I examine the stability of the OFMT and other traditionally used measures in atypical groups. On top of the theoretical significance of determining whether reliability of tests is equivalent in atypical population, this is an important question because of the practical concerns of retesting the same participants across different lab groups. Theoretical and practical implications for further test development and data sharing are discussed.