ePoster

LEARNING REPRESENTATIONS OF BRAIN-GLIOMA CONNECTIVITY TO UNDERSTAND AND INFORM SURVIVAL PROGNOSIS

Julia Rybskaand 9 co-authors

Sano Centre for Computational Medicine

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain
Board PS06-09PM-003

Presentation

Date TBA

Board: PS06-09PM-003

Poster preview

LEARNING REPRESENTATIONS OF BRAIN-GLIOMA CONNECTIVITY TO UNDERSTAND AND INFORM SURVIVAL PROGNOSIS poster preview

Event Information

Poster Board

PS06-09PM-003

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is increasingly recognized as a network disease, rather than an isolated histopathological entity, that evolves within and perturbs the brain connectome. We investigated whether patient-specific brain-glioma circuitry contains prognostic information beyond standard clinical factors. We analyzed 867 patients (WHO 2021) by filtering a normative tractogram for tumor-intersecting streamlines. Then, we computed patient-specific tract density maps, defined as the number of streamlines traversing each voxel. These maps were flattened, and the first 100 Principal Components (PCs) were extracted to represent circuit heterogeneity. Although three principal components explained over 50% of the variance in white matter-GBM interactions, nearly 50 components were required to reach 90%, indicating highly heterogeneous spatial patterns, with tumors preferentially involving either anterior or posterior ipsilateral and cross-hemispheric pathways but not both (Fig. left). Survival was assessed using regularized Cox models, comparing baseline clinical covariates against models sequentially incorporating PCs. While connectivity features alone showed significant but rather weak prognostic effects (C-index ≈ 0.65; Fig. center), models integrating connectivity with clinical covariates outperformed clinical baselines (C-index 0.72 vs 0.67; Fig. right). Prognostic performance improved monotonically as more PCs were added, indicating that the survival-related signal is distributed across multiple aspects of the brain-glioma circuitry rather than localized to a single pathway or pattern. Ranking PCs by survival association improved performance at low cut-offs but converged when all components were included (Fig. right). These findings motivate the use of representation learning, particularly deep-learning models, to capture the complex, distributed structure of brain-glioma connectivity for survival prediction.


Three-panel figure analyzing white matter-glioblastoma interactions. Left: Brain maps of the first two principal components, showing ipsilateral involvement and anterior-posterior differentiation patterns. Center: Graph of C-indices for models using only spatial components, showing lower predictive accuracy. Right: Graph of C-indices of the models that included connectivity and clinical covariates. The order of inclusion was according to the percentage of explained variance (orange), association with overall survival (blue), and random ordering (gray).

Recommended posters

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.