PULSE RATE AND PULSE AMPLITUDE MODULATION SENSITIVITY IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT RATS
The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Presentation
Date TBA
Event Information
Poster Board
PS07-10AM-531
Poster
View posterAbstract
Stimuli were centered at baseline pulse rates (100, 300, 450, 900 pps). We first identified units sensitive to both modulations, then mapped joint sensitivity near threshold modulation depths (eliciting ~15% response modulation).
Of 408 responsive multi-units, a substantial proportion were jointly sensitive (61.8% at 100 pps, 67.6% at 300 pps, 58.8% at 450 pps, 21.3% at 900 pps). A key finding was the diversity of FM encoding: while neural responses always covaried positively with AM, they could be either in-phase or in counterphase with FM (i.e., higher rates could increase or decrease firing). This anti-correlated FM response varied with baseline rate (e.g., 7.2% at 300 pps vs. 76.3% at 450 pps).
The diverse, heterogeneous responses across the IC population provide a robust neural substrate for disambiguating AM (loudness) from FM (pitch) changes. This suggests central auditory processing may naturally mitigate loudness confounds in pulse-rate pitch perception, informing future CI coding strategies.
Recommended posters
PULSE TIMING INTERVAL SENSITIVITY IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTED RATS EXCEEDS THRESHOLDS OBSERVED IN HUMAN COCHLEAR IMPLANT USERS
Fei Peng, Shiyi Fang, Muhammad Zeeshan, Qinjie Zhang, Jan Schnupp
PULSE-RATE DEPENDENT INTEGRATION OF ITD AND ILD CUES IN THE MOUSE AUDITORY MIDBRAIN
Yi Wang, Muhammad Zeeshan, Jan Schnupp
ENCODING OF ACOUSTIC AND ELECTRICAL COCHLEAR IMPLANT STIMULATION IN THE AUDITORY CORTEX ARE DISTINCT
Ariel Edward Hight, Michele Insanally, Julia K. Scarpa, Yuko Tamaoki, Rohit Makol, Yew Song Cheng, Michael Trumpis, Jonathan Viventi, Mario A. Svirsky, Robert C. Froemke
SPIKE-INITIATION SITE IN ELECTRICALLY STIMULATED HEALTHY AND LESIONED COCHLEAE II: APICAL-TO-BASAL ACTIVATION FOR DIFFERENT STIMULUS CONFIGURATIONS
Peter Baumhoff, Andrej Kral, Wiebke Konerding
GOOD INTERAURAL TIME DIFFERENCE SENSITIVITY DESPITE DIFFERENT HEARING EXPERIENCE IN COCHLEAR IMPLANTED RATS
Sarah Buchholz, Tim Fleiner, Aline R. Xavier, Susan Arndt, Jan W. Schnupp, Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl
TIMING MATTERS! – THE BENEFIT OF TEMPORAL FINE STRUCTURE FOR BINAURAL HEARING WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
Nicole Rosskothen-Kuhl, Aurelia Daxer, Konstantin Wiebe, Jan W Schnupp, Susan Arndt, Thomas Wesarg