Machine Learning seminars

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) has recently shown great promise as an approach to networked system control. Arguably, one of the most difficult and important tasks for which large scale networked system control is applicable is common-pool resource (CPR) management. Crucial CPRs include arable land, fresh water, wetlands, wildlife, fish stock, forests and the atmosphere, of which proper management is related to some of society’s greatest challenges such as food security, inequality and climate change. This talk will consist of three parts. In the first, we will briefly look at climate change and how it poses a significant threat to life on our planet. In the second, we will consider the potential of multi-agent systems for climate change mitigation and adaptation. And finally, in the third, we will discuss recent research from InstaDeep into better understanding the behaviour of networked MARL systems used for CPR management. More specifically, we will see how the tools from empirical game-theoretic analysis may be harnessed to analyse the differences in networked MARL systems. The results give new insights into the consequences associated with certain design choices and provide an additional dimension of comparison between systems beyond efficiency, robustness, scalability and mean control performance.

Rajanlab designs neural network models constrained by experimental data, and reverse engineers them to figure out how brain circuits function in health and disease. Recently, we have been developing a powerful new theory-based framework for “in-vivo tract tracing” from multi-regional neural activity collected experimentally. We call this framework CURrent-Based Decomposition (CURBD). CURBD employs recurrent neural networks (RNNs) directly constrained, from the outset, by time series measurements acquired experimentally, such as Ca2+ imaging or electrophysiological data. Once trained, these data-constrained RNNs let us infer matrices quantifying the interactions between all pairs of modeled units. Such model-derived “directed interaction matrices” can then be used to separately compute excitatory and inhibitory input currents that drive a given neuron from all other neurons. Therefore different current sources can be de-mixed – either within the same region or from other regions, potentially brain-wide – which collectively give rise to the population dynamics observed experimentally. Source de-mixed currents obtained through CURBD allow an unprecedented view into multi-region mechanisms inaccessible from measurements alone. We have applied this method successfully to several types of neural data from our experimental collaborators, e.g., zebrafish (Deisseroth lab, Stanford), mice (Harvey lab, Harvard), monkeys (Rudebeck lab, Sinai), and humans (Rutishauser lab, Cedars Sinai), where we have discovered both directed interactions brain wide and inter-area currents during different types of behaviors. With this framework based on data-constrained multi-region RNNs and CURrent Based Decomposition (CURBD), we can ask if there are conserved multi-region mechanisms across different species, as well as identify key divergences.

Traditional brain-style (connectionist) approaches basically hit a wall when it comes to relational cognition. As an alternative to the well-known approaches of structured connectionism and deep learning, I present an engine for relational pattern recognition based on minimalist reinterpretations of first principles of connectionism. Results of computational experiments will be discussed on problems testing relational learning and universal generalization.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Analogy-making is considered to be one of the cognitive processes which are hard to be accounted for in connectionist terms. A number of models have been proposed, but they are either tailed for specific analogical tasks or require complicated mechanisms which don’t fit into the mainstream connectionist modelling paradigm. In this talk I will present a new connectionist account of analogy-making based on the vector approach to representing symbols (VARS). This approach allows representing relational structures of varying complexity by numeric vectors with fixed dimensionality. I will also present a simple and computationally efficient mechanism of aligning VARS representations, which integrates both semantic similarity and structural constraints. The results of a series of simulations will demonstrate that VARS can account for basic analogical phenomena.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

The work to be presented in this talk proposes a novel framework seamlessly providing key properties of both neural nets (learning) and symbolic logic (knowledge and reasoning). Every neuron has a meaning as a component of a formula in a weighted real-valued logic, yielding a highly interpretable disentangled representation. Inference is omnidirectional rather than focused on predefined target variables, and corresponds to logical reasoning, including classical first-order logic theorem proving as a special case. The model is end-to-end differentiable, and learning minimizes a novel loss function capturing logical contradiction, yielding resilience to inconsistent knowledge. It also enables the open-world assumption by maintaining bounds on truth values which can have probabilistic semantics, yielding resilience to incomplete knowledge.

Remarkable advances in experimental neuroscience now enable us to simultaneously observe the activity of many neurons, thereby providing an opportunity to understand how the moment by moment collective dynamics of the brain instantiates learning and cognition. However, efficiently extracting such a conceptual understanding from large, high dimensional neural datasets requires concomitant advances in theoretically driven experimental design, data analysis, and neural circuit modeling. We will discuss how the modern frameworks of high dimensional statistics and deep learning can aid us in this process. In particular we will discuss: how unsupervised tensor component analysis and time warping can extract unbiased and interpretable descriptions of how rapid single trial circuit dynamics change slowly over many trials to mediate learning; how to tradeoff very different experimental resources, like numbers of recorded neurons and trials to accurately discover the structure of collective dynamics and information in the brain, even without spike sorting; deep learning models that accurately capture the retina’s response to natural scenes as well as its internal structure and function; algorithmic approaches for simplifying deep network models of perception; optimality approaches to explain cell-type diversity in the first steps of vision in the retina.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Abstract semantic relations (e.g., category membership, part-whole, antonymy, cause-effect) are central to human intelligence, underlying the distinctively human ability to reason by analogy. I will describe a computational project (Bayesian Analogy with Relational Transformations) that aims to extract explicit representations of abstract semantic relations from non-relational inputs automatically generated by machine learning. BART’s representations predict patterns of typicality and similarity for semantic relations, as well as similarity of neural signals triggered by semantic relations during analogical reasoning. In this approach, analogy emerges from the ability to learn and compare relations; mapping emerges later from the ability to compare patterns of relations.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

Many networks in the brain are sparsely connected, and the brain eliminates synapses during development and learning. How could the brain decide which synapses to prune? In a recurrent network, determining the importance of a synapse between two neurons is a difficult computational problem, depending on the role that both neurons play and on all possible pathways of information flow between them. Noise is ubiquitous in neural systems, and often considered an irritant to be overcome. In the first part of this talk, I will suggest that noise could play a functional role in synaptic pruning, allowing the brain to probe network structure and determine which synapses are redundant. I will introduce a simple, local, unsupervised plasticity rule that either strengthens or prunes synapses using only synaptic weight and the noise-driven covariance of the neighboring neurons. For a subset of linear and rectified-linear networks, this rule provably preserves the spectrum of the original matrix and hence preserves network dynamics even when the fraction of pruned synapses asymptotically approaches 1. The plasticity rule is biologically-plausible and may suggest a new role for noise in neural computation. Time permitting, I will then turn to the problem of extracting structure from neural population data sets using dimensionality reduction methods. I will argue that nonlinear structures naturally arise in neural data and show how these nonlinearities cause linear methods of dimensionality reduction, such as Principal Components Analysis, to fail dramatically in identifying low-dimensional structure.

The possibilities of machine learning and neural networks in particular are ever expanding. With increased opportunities to do good, however there are just as many opportunities to do harm and even in the case that good intentions are at the helm, evidence suggests that opportunities for good may eventually prove to be the opposite. The greatest threat to what machine learning is able to achieve and to us as humans, is machine learning that does not reflect the diversity of the users it is meant to serve. It is important that we are not so pre-occupied with advancing technology into the future that we have not taken the time to invest the energy into engineering the security measures this future requires. It is important to investigate now, as thoroughly as we investigate differing deep neural network architectures, the complex questions regarding the fact that humans and the society in which they operate is inherently biased and loaded with prejudice and that these traits find themselves in the machines we create (and increasingly allow to run our lives).

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.

In the Learning Salon, we will discuss the similarities and differences between biological and machine learning, including individuals with diverse perspectives and backgrounds, so we can all learn from one another.