Optogenetics seminars

Neurons in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN, the brain’s master circadian clock) display a 24 hour cycle in the their rate of action potential discharge whereby firing rates are high during the light phase and lower during the dark phase. Although it is generally agreed that this cycle of activity is a key mediator of the clock’s neural and humoral output, surprisingly little is known about how changes in clock electrical activity can mediate scheduled physiological changes at different times of day. Using opto- and chemogenetic approaches in mice we have shown that the onset of electrical activity in vasopressin releasing SCN neurons near Zeitgeber time 22 (ZT22) activates glutamatergic thirst-promoting neurons in the OVLT (organum vasculosum lamina terminalis) to promote water intake prior to sleep. This effect is mediated by activity-dependent release of vasopressin from the axon terminals of SCN neurons which acts as a neurotransmitter on OVLT neurons. More recently we found that the clock receives excitatory input from a different subset of sodium sensing neurons in the OVLT. Activation of these neurons by a systemic salt load delivered at ZT19 stimulated the electrical activity of SCN neurons which are normally silent at this time. Remarkably, this effect induced an acute reduction in non-shivering thermogenesis and body temperature, which is an adaptive response to the salt load. These findings provide information regarding the mechanisms by which the SCN promotes scheduled physiological rhythms and indicates that the clock’s output circuitry can also be recruited to mediate an unscheduled homeostatic response.

The dynamic nature of sleep in most animals suggests distinct stages which serve different functions. Genetic sleep induction methods in animal models provide a powerful way to disambiguate these stages and functions, although behavioural methods alone are insufficient to accurately identify what kind of sleep is being engaged. In Drosophila, activation of the dorsal fan-shaped body (dFB) promotes sleep, but it remains unclear what kind of sleep this is, how the rest of the fly brain is behaving, or if any specific sleep functions are being achieved. Here, we developed a method to record calcium activity from thousands of neurons across a volume of the fly brain during dFB-induced sleep, and we compared this to the effects of a sleep-promoting drug. We found that drug-induced spontaneous sleep decreased brain activity and connectivity, whereas dFB sleep was not different from wakefulness. Paradoxically, dFB-induced sleep was found to be even deeper than drug- induced sleep. When we probed the sleeping fly brain with salient visual stimuli, we found that the activity of visually-responsive neurons was blocked by dFB activation, confirming a disconnect from the external environment. Prolonged optogenetic dFB activation nevertheless achieved a significant sleep function, by correcting visual attention defects brought on by sleep deprivation. These results suggest that dFB activation promotes a distinct form of sleep in Drosophila, where brain activity and connectivity remain similar to wakefulness, but responsiveness to external sensory stimuli is profoundly suppressed.