Optogenetics seminars

To form a coherent perception of the world around us, we are constantly processing and integrating sensory information from multiple modalities. In fact, when auditory and visual stimuli occur within ~100 ms of each other, individuals tend to perceive the stimuli as a single event, even though they occurred separately. In recent years, our lab, and others, have developed rat models of audiovisual temporal perception using behavioural tasks such as temporal order judgments (TOJs) and synchrony judgments (SJs). While these rodent models demonstrate metrics that are consistent with humans (e.g., perceived simultaneity, temporal acuity), we have sought to confirm whether rodents demonstrate the hallmarks of audiovisual temporal perception, such as predictable shifts in their perception based on experience and sensitivity to alterations in neurochemistry. Ultimately, our findings indicate that rats serve as an excellent model to study the neural mechanisms underlying audiovisual temporal perception, which to date remains relativity unknown. Using our validated translational audiovisual behavioural tasks, in combination with optogenetics, neuropharmacology and in vivo electrophysiology, we aim to uncover the mechanisms by which inhibitory neurotransmission and top-down circuits finely control ones’ perception. This research will significantly advance our understanding of the neuronal circuitry underlying audiovisual temporal perception, and will be the first to establish the role of interneurons in regulating the synchronized neural activity that is thought to contribute to the precise binding of audiovisual stimuli.

Although bradykinesia, tremor, and rigidity are hallmark motor defects in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients, they also experience motor learning impairments and non-motor symptoms such as depression. The neural basis for these different PD symptoms are not well understood. While current treatments are effective for locomotion deficits in PD, therapeutic strategies targeting motor learning deficits and non-motor symptoms are lacking. We found that distinct parafascicular (PF) thalamic subpopulations project to caudate putamen (CPu), subthalamic nucleus (STN), and nucleus accumbens (NAc). While PF-->CPu and PF-->STN circuits are critical for locomotion and motor learning respectively, inhibition of the PF-->NAc circuit induced a depression-like state. While chemogenetically manipulating CPu-projecting PF neurons led to a long-term restoration of locomotion, optogenetic long-term potentiation at PF-->STN synapses restored motor learning behavior in PD model mice. Furthermore, activation of NAc-projecting PF neurons rescued depression-like PD phenotypes. Importantly, we identified nicotinic acetylcholine receptors capable of modulating PF circuits to rescue different PD phenotypes. Thus, targeting PF thalamic circuits may be an effective strategy for treating motor and non-motor deficits in PD.

How does our brain rapidly determine if something is good or bad? How do we know our place within a social group? How do we know how to behave appropriately in dynamic environments with ever-changing conditions? The Tye Lab is interested in understanding how neural circuits important for driving positive and negative motivational valence (seeking pleasure or avoiding punishment) are anatomically, genetically and functionally arranged. We study the neural mechanisms that underlie a wide range of behaviors ranging from learned to innate, including social, feeding, reward-seeking and anxiety-related behaviors. We have also become interested in “social homeostasis” -- how our brains establish a preferred set-point for social contact, and how this maintains stability within a social group. How are these circuits interconnected with one another, and how are competing mechanisms orchestrated on a neural population level? We employ optogenetic, electrophysiological, electrochemical, pharmacological and imaging approaches to probe these circuits during behavior.

Human movement disorders and pharmacological studies have long suggested molecular dopamine modulates the pace of the internal clock. But how does the endogenous dopaminergic system influence the timing of our movements? We examined the relationship between dopaminergic signaling and the timing of reward-related, self-timed movements in mice. Animals were trained to initiate licking after a self-timed interval following a start cue; reward was delivered if the animal’s first lick fell within a rewarded window (3.3-7 s). The first-lick timing distributions exhibited the scalar property, and we leveraged the considerable variability in these distributions to determine how the activity of the dopaminergic system related to the animals’ timing. Surprisingly, dopaminergic signals ramped-up over seconds between the start-timing cue and the self-timed movement, with variable dynamics that predicted the movement/reward time, even on single trials. Steeply rising signals preceded early initiation, whereas slowly rising signals preceded later initiation. Higher baseline signals also predicted earlier self-timed movement. Optogenetic activation of dopamine neurons during self-timing did not trigger immediate movements, but rather caused systematic early-shifting of the timing distribution, whereas inhibition caused late-shifting, as if dopaminergic manipulation modulated the moment-to-moment probability of unleashing the planned movement. Consistent with this view, the dynamics of the endogenous dopaminergic signals quantitatively predicted the moment-by-moment probability of movement initiation. We conclude that ramping dopaminergic signals, potentially encoding dynamic reward expectation, probabilistically modulate the moment-by-moment decision of when to move. (Based on work from Hamilos et al., eLife, 2021).