Physiology seminars

There is no consensus on if sleep is for the brain, body or both. But the difference in how we feel following disrupted sleep or having a good night of continuous sleep is striking. Understanding how and why we sleep will likely give insights into many aspects of health. In this talk I will outline our recent work on how the prefrontal cortex can signal to the hypothalamus to regulate sleep preparatory behaviours and sleep itself, and how other brain regions, including the ventral tegmental area, respond to psychosocial stress to induce beneficial sleep. I will also outline our work on examining the function of the glymphatic system, and whether clearance of molecules from the brain is enhanced during sleep or wakefulness.

The field of human biology faces three major technological challenges. Firstly, the causation problem is difficult to address in humans compared to model animals. Secondly, the complexity problem arises due to the lack of a comprehensive cell atlas for the human body, despite its cellular composition. Lastly, the heterogeneity problem arises from significant variations in both genetic and environmental factors among individuals. To tackle these challenges, we have developed innovative approaches. These include 1) mammalian next-generation genetics, such as Triple CRISPR for knockout (KO) mice and ES mice for knock-in (KI) mice, which enables causation studies without traditional breeding methods; 2) whole-body/brain cell profiling techniques, such as CUBIC, to unravel the complexity of cellular composition; and 3) accurate and user-friendly technologies for measuring sleep and awake states, exemplified by ACCEL, to facilitate the monitoring of fundamental brain states in real-world settings and thus address heterogeneity in human.

On a fast timescale, neurons mostly interact by short, stereotypical electrical impulses or spikes. Why? A common answer is that spikes are useful for long-distance communication, to avoid alterations while traveling along axons. But as it turns out, spikes are seen in many places outside neurons: in the heart, in muscles, in plants and even in protists. From these examples, it appears that action potentials mediate some form of coordinated action, a timed event. From this perspective, spikes should not be seen simply as noisy implementations of underlying continuous signals (a sort of analog-to-digital conversion), but rather as events or actions. I will give a number of examples of functional spike-based interactions in living systems.

Brain-organ communications play a crucial role in maintaining the body's physiological and psychological homeostasis, and are controlled by complex neural and hormonal systems, including the internal mechanosensory organs. However, the progress has been slow due to technical hurdles: the sensory neurons are deeply buried inside the body and are not readily accessible for direct observation, the projection patterns from different organs or body parts are complex rather than converging into dedicate brain regions, the coding principle cannot be directly adapted from that learned from conventional sensory pathways. Our lab apply the pipeline of "biophysics of receptors-cell biology of neurons-functionality of neural circuits-animal behaviors" to explore the molecular and neural mechanisms of self-perception. In the lab, we mainly focus on the following three questions: 1, The molecular and cellular basis for proprioception and interoception. 2, The circuit mechanisms of sensory coding and integration of internal and external information. 3, The function of interoception in regulating behavior homeostasis.

Like all neural tissue, the retina has a high metabolic demand, and requires a constant supply of oxygen. Second and third order neurons are supplied by the retinal circulation, whose characteristics are similar to brain circulation. However, the photoreceptor region, which occupies half of the retinal thickness, is avascular, and relies on diffusion of oxygen from the choroidal circulation, whose properties are very different, as well as the retinal circulation. By fitting diffusion models to oxygen measurements made with oxygen microelectrodes, it is possible to understand the relative roles of the two circulations under normal conditions of light and darkness, and what happens if the retina is detached or the retinal circulation is occluded. Most of this work has been done in vivo in rat, cat, and monkey, but recent work in the isolated mouse retina will also be discussed.

Since Darwin, comparative research has shown that most animals share basic timing capacities, such as the ability to process temporal regularities and produce rhythmic behaviors. What seems to be more exclusive, however, are the capacities to generate temporal predictions and to display anticipatory behavior at salient time points. These abilities are associated with subcortical structures like basal ganglia (BG) and cerebellum (CE), which are more developed in humans as compared to nonhuman animals. In the first research line, we investigated the basic capacities to extract temporal regularities from the acoustic environment and produce temporal predictions. We did so by adopting a comparative and translational approach, thus making use of a unique EEG dataset including 2 macaque monkeys, 20 healthy young, 11 healthy old participants and 22 stroke patients, 11 with focal lesions in the BG and 11 in the CE. In the second research line, we holistically explore the functional relevance of body-brain physiological interactions in human behavior. Thus, a series of planned studies investigate the functional mechanisms by which body signals (e.g., respiratory and cardiac rhythms) interact with and modulate neurocognitive functions from rest and sleep states to action and perception. This project supports the effort towards individual profiling: are individuals’ timing capacities (e.g., rhythm perception and production), and general behavior (e.g., individual walking and speaking rates) influenced / shaped by body-brain interactions?

The brain combines signals across the eyes. This process is well-characterized for the perceptual anatomical pathway through V1 that primarily codes contrast, where interocular normalization ensures that responses are approximately equal for monocular and binocular stimulation. But we have much less understanding of how luminance is combined binocularly, both in the cortex and in subcortical structures that govern pupil diameter. Here I will describe the results of experiments using a novel combined EEG and pupillometry paradigm to simultaneously index binocular combination of luminance flicker in parallel pathways. The results show evidence of a more linear process than for spatial contrast, that may reflect different operational constraints in distinct anatomical pathways.

Beyond vision, light triggers a variety of non-image forming responses. Amongst these is the pupillary light reflex, commonly used by ophthalmologists to gauge the function of the optic nerve head. In my talk, I will share some of our latest work on optimizing the use of the pupillary light reflex to detect functional loss in ocular diseases in clinics.

Do all components of the living human eye have a measurable diurnal rhythm? In this talk I will discuss methodologies and results of studies on adolescents and young adults. I will also touch upon the associations between diurnal rhythms of the eye and behavioral activities.

Night shift work is associated with adverse health effects and leads to misalignment between timing cues from the environment and the endogenous circadian clock. In this presentation, I will discuss the effect of circadian misalignment induced by night shift work on peripheral 24-h rhythms on the transcriptome and metabolome in humans, presenting findings from both controlled laboratory studies and field studies. Furthermore, I will highlight the importance of taking into account interindividual differences in the response to circadian misalignment.

A critical function of sensory systems is to reliably extract ethologically relevant features from the complex natural environment. A classic model to study feature detection is the direction-selective circuit of the mammalian retina. In this talk, I will discuss our recent work on how visual contexts dynamically influence the neural processing of motion signals in the direction-selective circuit in the mouse retina.

Since the discovery of the intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) – just two decades ago – substantial work has been carried out trying to understand their functioning. In this seminar, I’ll focus on pupillometry studies that have provided key clues about ipRGC behavior. Specifically, the interaction between the intrinsic response, rods, and cones will be discussed.

Laboratory studies have shown that meaningful changes in light exposure lead to phase shifts in melatonin rhythm. In natural settings, however, light is a very complex signal. How melatonin responds to weekly- and seasonal-dependent variations in light exposure is still poorly understood. In this talk I will present results from a series of observational and intervention studies on the relationship between melatonin and light exposure in the field.

The research in my lab focuses on sensory signal processing, particularly in cases where sensory systems perform at or near the limits imposed by physics. Photon counting in the visual system is a beautiful example. At its peak sensitivity, the performance of the visual system is limited largely by the division of light into discrete photons. This observation has several implications for phototransduction and signal processing in the retina: rod photoreceptors must transduce single photon absorptions with high fidelity, single photon signals in photoreceptors, which are only 0.03 – 0.1 mV, must be reliably transmitted to second-order cells in the retina, and absorption of a single photon by a single rod must produce a noticeable change in the pattern of action potentials sent from the eye to the brain. My approach is to combine quantitative physiological experiments and theory to understand photon counting in terms of basic biophysical mechanisms. Fortunately there is more to visual perception than counting photons. The visual system is very adept at operating over a wide range of light intensities (about 12 orders of magnitude). Over most of this range, vision is mediated by cone photoreceptors. Thus adaptation is paramount to cone vision. Again one would like to understand quantitatively how the biophysical mechanisms involved in phototransduction, synaptic transmission, and neural coding contribute to adaptation.

The arousal construct underlies a spectrum of behaviors that include sleep, exploration, feeding, sexual activity and adaptive stress. Pathological arousal conditions include stress, anxiety disorders, and addiction. The dynamics between arousal state transitions are modulated by norepinephrine neurons in the locus coeruleus, histaminergic neurons in the hypothalamus, dopaminergic neurons in the mesencephalon and cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain. The hypocretin/orexin system in the lateral hypothalamus I will also present a new mechanism underlying sleep fragmentation during aging. Hcrt neurons are hyperexcitable in aged mice. We identify a potassium conductance known as the M-current, as a critical player in maintaining excitability of Hcrt neurons. Genetic disruption of KCNQ channels in Hcrt neurons of young animals results in sleep fragmentation. In contrast, treatment of aged animals with a KCNQ channel opener restores sleep/wake architecture. These data point to multiple circuits modulating sleep integrity across lifespan.

This talk looks at the subject of my biography, the German physiologist Emil du Bois-Reymond (1818–1896). With respect to his philosophy of biological reduction, his methods of electrophysiological experiment, and his co-discovery of the action potential, du Bois-Reymond is generally considered one of the founders of neuroscience. Less well known are the origins of his innovation: French writers shaped his outlook on science, just as French scientists shaped his practice in the laboratory. I contend that du Bois-Reymond’s originality is the product of his synthesis of French traditions with German concerns.