Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity (BTSP) for biologically plausible credit assignment across multiple layers via top-down gating of dendritic plasticity
Computational Neuroscience, Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence and seminar by A. Galloni, Rutgers
Hosted by SNUFA
Wednesday 18:10–18:30 Berlin (GMT+1)
Recording available
Abstract
A central problem in biological learning is how information about the outcome of a decision or behavior can be used to reliably guide learning across distributed neural circuits while obeying biological constraints. This “credit assignment” problem is commonly solved in artificial neural networks through supervised gradient descent and the backpropagation algorithm. In contrast, biological learning is typically modelled using unsupervised Hebbian learning rules. While these rules only use local information to update synaptic weights, and are sometimes combined with weight constraints to reflect a diversity of excitatory (only positive weights) and inhibitory (only negative weights) cell types, they do not prescribe a clear mechanism for how to coordinate learning across multiple layers and propagate error information accurately across the network. In recent years, several groups have drawn inspiration from the known dendritic non-linearities of pyramidal neurons to propose new learning rules and network architectures that enable biologically plausible multi-layer learning by processing error information in segregated dendrites. Meanwhile, recent experimental results from the hippocampus have revealed a new form of plasticity—Behavioral Timescale Synaptic Plasticity (BTSP)—in which large dendritic depolarizations rapidly reshape synaptic weights and stimulus selectivity with as little as a single stimulus presentation (“one-shot learning”). Here we explore the implications of this new learning rule through a biologically plausible implementation in a rate neuron network. We demonstrate that regulation of dendritic spiking and BTSP by top-down feedback signals can effectively coordinate plasticity across multiple network layers in a simple pattern recognition task. By analyzing hidden feature representations and weight trajectories during learning, we show the differences between networks trained with standard backpropagation, Hebbian learning rules, and BTSP.
Topics
Related seminars
- Video · 55 min · Sep 30, 2021Alexander Meulemans, Institute of Neuroinformatics, University of Zürich and ETH ZürichMore on credit assignment
Deriving local synaptic learning rules for efficient representations in networks of spiking neurons
Video · 21 min · Nov 2, 2021Viola Priesemann, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-OrganizationBurst-dependent synaptic plasticity can coordinate learning in hierarchical circuits
Video · 1 h 25 min · Apr 3, 2020Blake Richards, McGill University
More from SNUFA
All talksCrescent Loom: a flexible neurophysiology online simulation for teaching neuroethology
Apr 5, 2023Olive PerryExtracting computational mechanisms from neural data using low-rank RNNs
Jan 11, 2023Adrian Valente
More with A. Galloni
All their workNeural Circuit Mechanisms of Pattern Separation in the Dentate Gyrus
Seminar · Video · 29 min · Jun 1, 2022SNUFA
Upcoming in Computational Neuroscience
All seminarsLearning to Oscillate: Hebbian Plasticity Imprints Limit Cycles in Neural Networks
Nov 4, 2026Pierfrancesco Urbani