World Wide relies on analytics signals to operate securely and keep research services available. Accept to continue, or leave the site.
Review the Privacy Policy for details about analytics processing.
Postgraduate Associate
Yale University
Showing your local timezone
Schedule
Wednesday, December 1, 2021
3:15 AM America/New_York
Recording provided by the organiser.
Domain
NeuroscienceOriginal Event
View sourceHost
Neuromatch 4
Duration
15 minutes
How do humans perceive daily objects of various features and categorize these seemingly intuitive and effortless mental representations? Prior literature focusing on the role of the inferotemporal region (IT) has revealed object category clustering that is consistent with the semantic predefined structure (superordinate, ordinate, subordinate). It has however been debated whether the neural signals in the IT regions are a reflection of such categorical hierarchy [Wen et al.,2018; Bracci et al., 2017]. Visual attributes of images that correlated with semantic and category dimensions may have confounded these prior results. Our study aimed to address this debate by building and comparing models using the DNN AlexNet, to explain the variance in representational dissimilarity matrix (RDM) of neural signals in the IT region. We found that mid and high level perceptual attributes of the DNN model contribute the most to neural RDMs in the IT region. Semantic categories, as in predefined structure, were moderately correlated with mid to high DNN layers (r = [0.24 - 0.36]). Variance partitioning analysis also showed that the IT neural representations were mostly explained by DNN layers, while semantic categorical RDMs brought little additional information. In light of these results, we propose future works should focus more on the specific role IT plays in facilitating the extraction and coding of visual features that lead to the emergence of categorical conceptualizations.
Hanxiao Lu
Postgraduate Associate
Yale University
Contact & Resources
neuro
neuro
neuro