Redressing imbalances in the kind of research that gets done and who gets credit for it
Software seminar by Alex Holcombe, University of Sydney
Hosted by AFC Lab & CARLA Talk Series
Monday 13:00–14:10 Berlin (GMT+2)
Ended
Abstract
If we want good work to get done, we should credit those who do it. In science, researchers are credited predominantly via authorship on publications. But many contributions to modern research are not recognized with authorship, due in part to the high bar imposed by the authorship criteria of many journals. “Contributorship” is a more inclusive framework for indicating who did what in the work described by a paper, and many scientific journals have recently implemented versions of it. I will consider the motivation for and specifics of this change, describe the tenzing tool we created to facilitate it, and how we might want to support and shape the shift toward contributorship
Topics
Show 3 more topics
Related seminars
How can we shift research culture to drive Credibility in Neuroscience?
Multiple speakers · Recording · Dec 1, 2022
More from AFC Lab & CARLA Talk Series
All talksA personal journey on understanding intelligence
Jul 16, 2025Li Yang KuDigital Traces of Human Behaviour: From Political Mobilisation to Conspiracy Narratives
Jul 7, 2025Lukasz PiwekFLUXSynID: High-Resolution Synthetic Face Generation for Document and Live Capture Images
Jul 2, 2025Raul IsmayilovAn Ecological and Objective Neural Marker of Implicit Unfamiliar Identity Recognition
Jun 11, 2025Tram Nguyen