World Wide relies on analytics signals to operate securely and keep research services available. Accept to continue, or leave the site.
Review the Privacy Policy for details about analytics processing.
Arizona State University, USA
Showing your local timezone
Schedule
Wednesday, April 21, 2021
12:30 AM America/New_York
Seminar location
No geocoded details are available for this content yet.
Recording provided by the organiser.
Format
Recorded Seminar
Recording
Available
Host
Timing Research Forum
Duration
30.00 minutes
Seminar location
No geocoded details are available for this content yet.
Interpretation of interval timing data generated from animal models is complicated by ostensible motivational effects which arise from the delay-to-reward imposed by interval timing tasks, as well as overlap between timed and non-timed responses. These factors become increasingly prevalent at longer intervals. To address these concerns, two adjustments to long interval timing tasks are proposed. First, subjects should be afforded with reinforced non-timing behaviors concurrent with timing. Second, subjects should initiate the onset of timed stimuli. Under these conditions, interference by extraneous behavior would be detected in the rate of concurrent non- timing behaviors, and changes in motivation would be detected in the rate at which timed stimuli are initiated. In a task with these characteristics, rats initiated a concurrent fixed-interval (FI) random-ratio (RR) schedule of reinforcement. This design facilitated response-initiated timing behavior, even at increasingly long delays. Pre-feeding manipulations revealed an effect on the number of initiated trials, but not on the timing peak function.
Tanya Gupta
Arizona State University, USA
neuro
Decades of research on understanding the mechanisms of attentional selection have focused on identifying the units (representations) on which attention operates in order to guide prioritized sensory p
neuro
neuro