Sussex Visions

Animals are able to perceive self-motion and navigate in their environment using optic flow information. They often perform visually guided stabilization behaviors like the optokinetic (OKR) or optomotor response (OMR) in order to maintain their eye and body position relative to the moving surround. But how does the animal manage to perform appropriate behavioral response and how are processing tasks divided between the various non-cortical visual brain areas? Experiments have shown that the zebrafish pretectum, which is homologous to the mammalian accessory optic system, is involved in the OKR and OMR. The optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) is involved in processing of small stimuli, e.g. during prey capture. We have previously shown that many pretectal neurons respond selectively to rotational or translational motion. These neurons are likely detectors for specific optic flow patterns and mediate behavioral choices of the animal based on optic flow information. We investigate the motion feature extraction of brain structures that receive input from retinal ganglion cells to identify the visual computations that underlie behavioral decisions during prey capture, OKR, OMR and other visually mediate behaviors. Our study of receptive fields shows that receptive field sizes in pretectum (large) and tectum (small) are very different and that pretectal responses are diverse and anatomically organized. Since calcium indicators are slow and receptive fields for motion stimuli are difficult to measure, we also develop novel stimuli and statistical methods to infer the neuronal computations of visual brain areas.

How does a circuit of neurons process sensory information? And how are transformations of neural signals altered by changes in synaptic strength? We investigate these questions in the context of the visual system and the lateral line of fish. A distinguishing feature of our approach is the imaging of activity across populations of synapses – the fundamental elements of signal transfer within all brain circuits. A guiding hypothesis is that the plasticity of neurotransmission plays a major part in controlling the input-output relation of sensory circuits, regulating the tuning and sensitivity of neurons to allow adaptation or sensitization to particular features of the input. Sensory systems continuously adjust their input-output relation according to the recent history of the stimulus. A common alteration is a decrease in the gain of the response to a constant feature of the input, termed adaptation. For instance, in the retina, many of the ganglion cells (RGCs) providing the output produce their strongest responses just after the temporal contrast of the stimulus increases, but the response declines if this input is maintained. The advantage of adaptation is that it prevents saturation of the response to strong stimuli and allows for continued signaling of future increases in stimulus strength. But adaptation comes at a cost: a reduced sensitivity to a future decrease in stimulus strength. The retina compensates for this loss of information through an intriguing strategy: while some RGCs adapt following a strong stimulus, a second population gradually becomes sensitized. We found that the underlying circuit mechanisms involve two opposing forms of synaptic plasticity in bipolar cells: synaptic depression causes adaptation and facilitation causes sensitization. Facilitation is in turn caused by depression in inhibitory synapses providing negative feedback. These opposing forms of plasticity can cause simultaneous increases and decreases in contrast-sensitivity of different RGCs, which suggests a general framework for understanding the function of sensory circuits: plasticity of both excitatory and inhibitory synapses control dynamic changes in tuning and gain.

During the course of evolution, a species’ environment shapes its sensory abilities, as individuals with more optimized sensory abilities are more likely survive and procreate. Adaptations to the statistics of the natural environment can be observed along the early visual pathway and across species. Therefore, characterising the properties of natural environments and studying the representation of natural scenes along the visual pathway is crucial for advancing our understanding of the structure and function of the visual system. In the past 20 years, mice have become an important model in vision research, but the fact that they live in a different environment than primates and have different visual needs is rarely considered. One particular challenge for characterising the mouse’s visual environment is that they are dichromats with photoreceptors that detect UV light, which the typical camera does not record. This also has consequences for experimental visual stimulation, as the blue channel of computer screens fails to excite mouse UV cone photoreceptors. In my talk, I will describe our approach to recording “colour” footage of the habitat of mice – from the mouse’s perspective – and to studying retinal circuits in the ex vivo retina with natural movies.

Zebrafish and cichlids are popular models in visual neuroscience, due to their amenability to advanced research tools and their diverse set of visually guided behaviours. It is often asserted that animals’ neural systems are adapted to the statistical regularities in their natural environments, but relatively little is known about the visual spatiotemporal features in the underwater habitats that nurtured these fish. To address this gap, we have embarked on an examination of underwater habitats in northeastern India and Lake Tanganyika (Zambia), where zebrafish and cichlids are native. In this talk, we will describe the methods used to conduct a series of field measurements and generate a large and diverse dataset of these underwater habitats. We will present preliminary results suggesting that the demands for visually-guided navigation differ between these underwater habitats and the terrestrial habitats characteristic of other model species.

Visual processing begins in the retina: within only two synaptic layers, multiple parallel feature channels emerge, which relay highly processed visual information to different parts of the brain. To functionally characterize these feature channels we perform calcium and glutamate population activity recordings at different levels of the mouse retina. This allows following the complete visual signal across consecutive processing stages in a systematic way. In my talk, I will summarize our recent findings on the functional diversity of retinal output channels and how they arise within the retinal network. Specifically, I will talk about the role of inhibition and cell-type specific dendritic processing in generating diverse visual channels. Then, I will focus on how color – a single visual feature – emerges across all retinal processing layers and link our results to behavioral output and the statistics of mouse natural scenes. With our approach, we hope to identify general computational principles of retinal signaling, thereby increasing our understanding of what the eye tells the brain.

Electronic interfaces to the retina represent an exciting development in science, engineering, and medicine – an opportunity to exploit our knowledge of neural circuitry and function to restore or even enhance vision. However, although existing devices demonstrate proof of principle in treating incurable blindness, they produce limited visual function. Some of the reasons for this can be understood based on the precise and specific neural circuitry that mediates visual signaling in the retina. Consideration of this circuitry suggests that future devices may need to operate at single-cell, single-spike resolution in order to mediate naturalistic visual function. I will show large-scale multi-electrode recording and stimulation data from the primate retina indicating that, in some cases, such resolution is possible. I will also discuss cases in which it fails, and propose that we can improve artificial vision in such conditions by incorporating our knowledge of the visual system in bi-directional devices that adapt to the host neural circuitry. Finally, I will introduce the Stanford Artificial Retina Project, aimed at developing a retinal implant that more faithfully reproduces the neural code of the retina, and briefly discuss the implications for scientific investigation and for other neural interfaces of the future.

Retinal projections often poorly represent the structure of the physical world: well-defined boundaries within the eye may correspond to irrelevant features of the physical world, while critical features of the physical world may be nearly invisible at the retinal projection. Visual cortex is equipped with specialized mechanisms for sorting these two types of features according to their utility in interpreting the scene, however we know little or nothing about their perceptual computations. I will present novel paradigms for the characterization of these processes in human vision, alongside examples of how the associated empirical results can be combined with targeted models to shape our understanding of the underlying perceptual mechanisms. Although the emerging view is far from complete, it challenges compartmentalized notions of bottom-up/top-down object segmentation, and suggests instead that these two modes are best viewed as an integrated perceptual mechanism.

Popular notions of how the retina encodes visual stimuli typically focus on the center-surround receptive fields of retinal ganglion cells, the output neurons of the retina. In this view, the receptive field acts as a linear filter on the visual stimulus, highlighting spatial contrast and providing efficient representations of natural images. Yet, we also know that many ganglion cells respond vigorously to fine spatial gratings that should not activate the linear filter of the receptive field. Thus, ganglion cells may integrate visual signals nonlinearly across space. In this talk, I will discuss how these (and other) nonlinearities relate to the encoding of natural visual stimuli in the retina. Based on electrophysiological recordings of ganglion and bipolar cells from mouse and salamander retina, I will present methods for assessing nonlinear processing in different cell types and examine their importance and potential function under natural stimulation.

Many visual systems can process information in dynamically changing environments. In general, visual perception scales with changes in the visual stimulus, or contrast, irrespective of background illumination. This is achieved by adaptation. However, visual perception is challenged when adaptation is not fast enough to deal with sudden changes in overall illumination, for example when gaze follows a moving object from bright sunlight into a shaded area. We have recently shown that the visual system of the fly found a solution by propagating a corrective luminance-sensitive signal to higher processing stages. Using in vivo two-photon imaging and behavioural analyses we showed that distinct OFF-pathway inputs encode contrast and luminance. The luminance-sensitive pathway is particularly required when processing visual motion in contextual dim light, when pure contrast sensitivity underestimates the salience of a stimulus. Recent work in the lab has addressed the question how two visual pathways obtain such fundamentally different sensitivities, given common photoreceptor input. We are furthermore currently working out the network-based strategies by which luminance- and contrast-sensitive signals are combined to guide appropriate visual behaviour. Together, I will discuss the molecular, cellular, and circuit mechanisms that ensure contrast computation, and therefore robust vision, in fast changing visual scenes.

Understanding how neural circuits in the brain compute information not only requires determining how individual inhibitory and excitatory elements of circuits are wired together, but also a detailed knowledge of their functional interactions. Recent advances in optogenetic techniques and mouse genetics now offer ways to specifically probe the functional properties of neural circuits with unprecedented specificity. Perhaps one of the most heavily interrogated circuits in the mouse brain is one in the retina that is involved in coding direction (reviewed by Mauss et al., 2017; Vaney et al., 2012). In this circuit, direction is encoded by specialized direction-selective (DS) ganglion cells (DSGCs), which respond robustly to objects moving in a ‘preferred’ direction but not in the opposite or ‘null’ direction (Barlow and Levick, 1965). We now know this computation relies on the coordination of three transmitter systems: glutamate, GABA and acetylcholine (ACh). In this talk, I will discuss the synaptic mechanisms that produce the spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition and excitation that are crucial for shaping directional selectivity. Special emphasis will be placed on the role of ACh, as it is unclear whether it is mediated by synaptic or non-synaptic mechanisms, which is in fact a central issue in the CNS. Barlow, H.B., and Levick, W.R. (1965). The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J Physiol 178, 477-504. Mauss, A.S., Vlasits, A., Borst, A., and Feller, M. (2017). Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity. Annu Rev Neurosci 40, 211-230. Vaney, D.I., Sivyer, B., and Taylor, W.R. (2012). Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 194-208

Our laboratory seeks to understand how neural circuits receive, compute, encode and transmit information. More specifically, we’d like to learn what biophysical and morphological features equip synapses, neurons and networks to perform these tasks. The retina is a model system for the study of neuronal information processing: We can deliver precisely defined physiological stimuli and record responses from many different cell types at various points within the network; in addition, retinal circuitry is particularly well understood, enabling us to interpret more directly the impact of synaptic and cellular mechanisms on circuit function. I will present recent experiments in the lab that exploit these advantages to examine how synapses and neurons within retinal amacrine cell circuits perform specific visual computations.