Neuroscience seminars

The nervous system is fundamentally a closed loop control device: the output of actions continually influences the internal state and subsequent actions. This is true at the single cell and even the molecular level, where “actions” take the form of signals that are fed back to achieve a variety of functions, including homeostasis, excitability and various kinds of multistability that allow switching and storage of memory. It is also true at the behavioural level, where an animal’s motor actions directly influence sensory input on short timescales, and higher level information about goals and intended actions are continually updated on the basis of current and past actions. Studying the brain in a closed loop setting requires a multidisciplinary approach, leveraging engineering and theory as well as advances in measuring and manipulating the nervous system. I will describe our recent attempts to achieve this fusion of approaches at multiple levels in the nervous system, from synaptic signalling to closed loop brain machine interfaces.

Coordination between excitatory and inhibitory synapses (providing positive and negative signals respectively) is required to ensure proper information processing in the brain. Many brain disorders, especially neurodevelopental disorders, are rooted in a specific disturbance of this coordination. In my research group we use a combination of two-photon microscopy and electrophisiology to examine how inhibitory synapses are fromed and how this formation is coordinated with nearby excitatroy synapses.

Maladaptive emotional memories contribute to the persistence of numerous mental health disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), drug addiction and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Using rodent behavioural models of the psychological processes relevant to these disorders, it is possible to identify potential treatment targets for the development of new therapies, including those based upon disrupting the reconsolidation of maladaptive emotional memories. Using examples from rodent models relevant to multiple mental health disorders, this talk will consider some of the opportunities and challenges that this approach provides.

Understanding the brain is not only intrinsically fascinating, but also highly relevant to increase our well-being since our brain exhibits a power over the body that makes it capable both of provoking illness or facilitating the healing process. Bearing in mind this dark force, brain sciences have undergone and will undergo an important revolution, redefining its boundaries beyond the cranial cavity. During this presentation, we will discuss about the communication between the brain and other systems that shapes how we feel the external word and how we think. We are starting to unravel how our organs talk to the brain and how the brain talks back. That two-way communication encompasses a complex, body-wide system of nerves, hormones and other signals that will be discussed. This presentation aims at challenging a long history of thinking of bodily regulation as separate from "higher" mental processes. Four centuries ago, René Descartes famously conceptualized the mind as being separate from the body, it is time now to embody our mind.

Zoe has developed an open-source tool PhaSER, which allows her to perform real-time oscillatory phase estimation and apply optogenetic manipulations at precise phases of hippocampal theta during high-density electrophysiological recordings in head-fixed mice while they navigate a virtual environment. The precise timing of single-unit spiking relative to network-wide oscillations (i.e., phase locking) has long been thought to maintain excitatory-inhibitory homeostasis and coordinate cognitive processes, but due to intense experimental demands, the causal influence of this phenomenon has never been determined. Thus, we developed PhaSER (Phase-locked Stimulation to Endogenous Rhythms), a tool which allows the user to explore the temporal relationship between single-unit spiking and ongoing oscillatory activity.

Different prefrontal areas contribute in distinctly different ways to rule-guided behaviour in the context of a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) analog for macaques. For example, causal evidence from circumscribed lesions in NHPs reveals that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) is necessary to maintain a reinforced abstract rule in working memory, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) is needed to rapidly update representations of rule value, and the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) plays a key role in cognitive control and integrating information for correct and incorrect trials over recent outcomes. Moreover, recent lesion studies of frontopolar cortex (FPC) suggest it contributes to representing the relative value of unchosen alternatives, including rules. Yet we do not understand how these functional specializations relate to intrinsic neuronal activities nor the extent to which these neuronal activities differ between different prefrontal regions. After reviewing the aforementioned causal evidence I will present our new data from studies using multi-area multi-electrode recording techniques in NHPs to simultaneously record from four different prefrontal regions implicated in rule-guided behaviour. Multi-electrode micro-arrays (‘Utah arrays’) were chronically implanted in dlPFC, vlPFC, OFC, and FPC of two macaques, allowing us to simultaneously record single and multiunit activity, and local field potential (LFP), from all regions while the monkey performs the WCST analog. Rule-related neuronal activity was widespread in all areas recorded but it differed in degree and in timing between different areas. I will also present preliminary results from decoding analyses applied to rule-related neuronal activities both from individual clusters and also from population measures. These results confirm and help quantify dynamic task-related activities that differ between prefrontal regions. We also found task-related modulation of LFPs within beta and gamma bands in FPC. By combining this correlational recording methods with trial-specific causal interventions (electrical microstimulation) to FPC we could significantly enhance and impair animals performance in distinct task epochs in functionally relevant ways, further consistent with an emerging picture of regional functional specialization within a distributed framework of interacting and interconnected cortical regions.

The Bernstein Student Workshop Series is an initiative of the student members of the Bernstein Network. It provides a unique opportunity to enhance the technical exchange on a peer-to-peer basis. The series is motivated by the idea of bridging the gap between theoretical and experimental neuroscience by bringing together methodological expertise in the network. Unlike conventional workshops, a talented junior scientist will first give a tutorial about a specific theoretical or experimental technique, and then give a talk about their own research to demonstrate how the technique helps to address neuroscience questions. The workshop series is designed to cover a wide range of theoretical and experimental techniques and to elucidate how different techniques can be applied to answer different types of neuroscience questions. Combining the technical tutorial and the research talk, the workshop series aims to promote knowledge sharing in the community and enhance in-depth discussions among students from diverse backgrounds.

Critical phenomena abound in nature, from forest fires and earthquakes to avalanches in sand and neuronal activity. Since the 2003 publication by Beggs & Plenz on neuronal avalanches, a growing body of work suggests that the brain homeostatically regulates itself to operate near a critical point where information processing is optimal. At this critical point, incoming activity is neither amplified (supercritical) nor damped (subcritical), but approximately preserved as it passes through neural networks. Departures from the critical point have been associated with conditions of poor neurological health like epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. One complication that arises from this picture is that the critical point assumes no external input. But, biological neural networks are constantly bombarded by external input. How is then the brain able to homeostatically adapt near the critical point? We’ll see that the theory of quasicriticality, an organizing principle for brain dynamics, can account for this paradoxical situation. As external stimuli drive the cortex, quasicriticality predicts a departure from criticality while maintaining optimal properties for information transmission. We’ll see that simulations and experimental data confirm these predictions and describe new ones that could be tested soon. More importantly, we will see how this organizing principle could help in the search for biomarkers that could soon be tested in clinical studies.

The critical brain hypothesis states that the brain can benefit from operating close to a second-order phase transition. While it has been shown that several computational aspects of sensory information processing (e.g., sensitivity to input) are optimal in this regime, it is still unclear whether these computational benefits of criticality can be leveraged by neural systems performing behaviorally relevant computations. To address this question, we investigate signatures of criticality in networks optimized to perform efficient encoding. We consider a network of leaky integrate-and-fire neurons with synaptic transmission delays and input noise. Previously, it was shown that the performance of such networks varies non-monotonically with the noise amplitude. Interestingly, we find that in the vicinity of the optimal noise level for efficient coding, the network dynamics exhibits signatures of criticality, namely, the distribution of avalanche sizes follows a power law. When the noise amplitude is too low or too high for efficient coding, the network appears either super-critical or sub-critical, respectively. This result suggests that two influential, and previously disparate theories of neural processing optimization—efficient coding, and criticality—may be intimately related

One of the most common medical conditions you’ve (maybe) never heard of – functional neurological disorder – lays at the interface of neurology and psychiatry and offers a window into fundamental brain-mind-body processes. Across ancient and modern times, functional neurological disorder has had a long and tumultuous history, with an evolving debate and understanding of how biopsychosocial factors contribute to the manifestation of the disorder. A central issue in contemporary discussions has revolved around questioning the extent to which emotions play a mechanistic and aetiological role in functional neurological disorder. Critical in this context, however, is that this ongoing debate has largely omitted the question of what emotions are in the first place. This talk first brings together advances in the understanding of working principles of the brain fundamental to introducing a new understanding of what emotions are. Building on recent theoretical frameworks from affective neuroscience, the idea of how the predictive process of emotion construction can be an integral component of the pathophysiology of functional neurological disorder is discussed.

Neural activity is often described in terms of population-level factors extracted from the responses of many neurons. Factors provide a lower-dimensional description with the aim of shedding light on network computations. Yet, mechanistically, computations are performed not by continuously valued factors but by interactions among neurons that spike discretely and variably. Models provide a means of bridging these levels of description. We developed a general method for training model networks of spiking neurons by leveraging factors extracted from either data or firing-rate-based networks. In addition to providing a useful model-building framework, this formalism illustrates how reliable and continuously valued factors can arise from seemingly stochastic spiking. Our framework establishes procedures for embedding this property in network models with different levels of realism. The relationship between spikes and factors in such networks provides a foundation for interpreting (and subtly redefining) commonly used quantities such as firing rates.

I will discuss work with Jack Lindsey modeling reinforcement learning for action selection in the basal ganglia. I will argue that the presence of multiple brain regions, in addition to the basal ganglia, that contribute to motor control motivates the need for an off-policy basal ganglia learning algorithm. I will then describe a biological implementation of such an algorithm that predicts tuning of dopamine neurons to a quantity we call "action surprise," in addition to reward prediction error. In the same model, an implementation of learning from a motor efference copy also predicts a novel solution to the problem of multiplexing feedforward and efference-related striatal activity. The solution exploits the difference between D1 and D2-expressing medium spiny neurons and leads to predictions about striatal dynamics.

Rhythmic changes in sex hormone levels across the ovarian cycle exert powerful effects on the brain and behavior, and confer female-specific risks for neuropsychiatric conditions. In this talk, Dr. Kundakovic will discuss the role of fluctuating ovarian hormones as a critical biological factor contributing to the increased depression and anxiety risk in women. Cycling ovarian hormones drive brain and behavioral plasticity in both humans and rodents, and the talk will focus on animal studies in Dr. Kundakovic’s lab that are revealing the molecular and receptor mechanisms that underlie this female-specific brain dynamic. She will highlight the lab’s discovery of sex hormone-driven epigenetic mechanisms, namely chromatin accessibility and 3D genome changes, that dynamically regulate neuronal gene expression and brain plasticity but may also prime the (epi)genome for psychopathology. She will then describe functional studies, including hormone replacement experiments and the overexpression of an estrous cycle stage-dependent transcription factor, which provide the causal link(s) between hormone-driven chromatin dynamics and sex-specific anxiety behavior. Dr. Kundakovic will also highlight an unconventional role that chromatin dynamics may have in regulating neuronal function across the ovarian cycle, including in sex hormone-driven X chromosome plasticity and hormonally-induced epigenetic priming. In summary, these studies provide a molecular framework to understand ovarian hormone-driven brain plasticity and increased female risk for anxiety and depression, opening new avenues for sex- and gender-informed treatments for brain disorders.