Neuroscience seminars

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common age-related neurodegenerative disorder. Familial forms of Alzheimer’s disease associated with the accumulation of a toxic form of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides are linked to mitochondrial impairment. The coenzyme nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is essential for both mitochondrial bioenergetics and nuclear DNA repair through NAD+-consuming poly (ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs). Here, we analysed the metabolomic changes in flies over-expressing Aβ and showed a decrease of metabolites associated with nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism, which is critical for mitochondrial function in neurons. We show that increasing the bioavailability of NAD+ protects against Aβ toxicity. Pharmacological supplementation using NAM, a form of vitamin B that acts as a precursor for NAD+ or a genetic mutation of PARP rescues mitochondrial defects, protects neurons against degeneration and reduces behavioural impairments in a fly model of Alzheimer’s disease. Next, we looked at links between PARP polymorphisms and vitamin B intake in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. We show that polymorphisms in the human PARP1 gene or the intake of vitamin B, are associated with a decrease in the risk and severity of Alzheimer’s disease. We suggest that enhancing the availability of NAD+ by either vitamin B supplements or the inhibition of NAD+-dependent enzymes, such as PARPs are potential therapies for Alzheimer’s disease.

(1) We (Grace Lindsay) used convolutional neural nets to model attention, by scaling the input/output function of neurons in an imagenet-trained network according to their selectivity for the feature or object category being attended. While this was effective in improving performance on difficult tasks, it was far less effective in earlier than in later layers. This indicated that neurons selective for a feature in earlier layers did not necessarily drive neurons selective for that feature in later layers. In contrast, applying attention according to the gradient for improving task performance worked well in early as well as late layers. This raises the question whether biological attentional modulation might reflect task requirements and not only the features of the stimuli to be attended. We suggest a simple experiment to answer this question, which we hope to convince an appropriate lab to carry out. (2) In E/I networks, a "paradoxical" response to stimulation has been shown: If the excitatory neurons would be unstable by themselves, but are stabilized by feedback inhibition (an "inhibition-stabilized network", or ISN), then, in response to addition of excitatory input to inhibitory neurons, their steady-state firing rates paradoxically decrease. In circuits with multiple inhibitory cell types, this has been generalized: in an ISN, if there is an added stimulus only to inhibitory cells, there will be a paradoxical change in the net inhibition received by excitatory cells -- e.g., if excitatory firing rates increase, so too will the net inhibition they receive. This does not imply that the firing rates of any particular inhibitory cell type will change paradoxically. Here we (Agostina Palmigiano along with Francesco Fumarola, and experimental work of Dan Mossing in the Adesnik lab) generalize the conditions for a paradoxical firing rate response, including in responses to partial as well as full perturbation of the neurons of a given cell type. We work in the context of the circuit with three inhibitory cell types (PV, SOM, VIP) in mouse V1. We show that, if a given cell type shows a paradoxical response to its own full stimulation, then the circuit without that cell type is unstable. This and experimental results to date, as well as our models fitted to data, suggest that PV but not SOM interneurons stabilize the circuit of layer 2/3 of mouse V1, at least for smaller visual stimulus sizes. For partial perturbations of a fraction f of a cell type that responds paradoxically to a full perturbation, there is a "fractional paradoxical effect": the proportion of all the cells of that type, stimulated and unstimulated, that respond opposite to the stimulation (i.e. negative response to excitation), changes non-monotonically, approaching 1 for f→0, decreasing with increasing f, and then increasing again to again approach 1 as f→1. I'll explain the origins of this behavior.3) We (Mario Dipoppa, in collaboration with the experimental work of Andy Keller and Morgane Roth from the Scanziani lab) have studied the E-PV-SOM-VIP circuit underlying contextual modulation in layer 2/3 of mouse V1. Experiments showed that E, PV, and VIP are suppressed by a surround stimuus that has the same orientation as, but not by one orthogonal to, the center stimulus. SOM neurons show the opposite behavior, being suppressed by an orthogonal but much less by a parallel surround. A combination of theory and optogenetic experiments show that the disinhibitory circuit -- VIP inhibits SOM, which inhibits E -- modulate responses between the two conditions. However, it does so, as part of the recurrent circuit, primarily by changing the recurrent excitation E cells receive, rather than by directly changing the inhibition received, in a manner reminiscent of the paradoxical response. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2021-06-09. Recording duration: 00:51:59.

The hippocampus and the amygdala are two structures required for emotional memory. While the hippocampus encodes the contextual part of the memory, the amygdala processes its emotional valence. During Non-REM sleep, the hippocampus displays high frequency oscillations called “ripples”. Our early work shows that the suppression of ripples during sleep impairs performance on a spatial task, underlying their crucial role in memory consolidation. We more recently showed that the joint amygdala-hippocampus activity linked to aversive learning is reinstated during the following Non-REM sleep epochs, specifically during ripples. This mechanism potentially sustains the consolidation of aversive associative memories during Non REM sleep. On the other hand, REM sleep is associated with regular 8 Hz theta oscillations, and is believed to play a role in emotional processing. A crucial, initial step in understanding this role is to unravel sleep dynamics related to REM sleep in the hippocampus-amygdala network

Several studies have showed that face stimuli elicit extremely fast and involuntary saccadic responses toward them, relative to other categories of visual stimuli. In the talk, I will mainly focus on a quite recent research done in our team that investigated to what extent face stimuli influence the programming and execution of saccades. In this research, two experiments were performed using a saccadic choice task: two images (one with a face, one with a vehicle) were simultaneously displayed in the left and right visual fields of participants who had to execute a saccade toward the image (Experiment 1) or toward a cross added in the center of the image (Experiment 2) containing a target stimulus (a face or a vehicle). As expected participants were faster to execute a saccade toward a face than toward a vehicle and did less errors. We also observed shorter saccades toward vehicle than face targets, even if participants were explicitly asked to perform their saccades toward a specific location (Experiment 2). Further analyses, that I will detailed in the talk, showed that error saccades might be interrupted in mid-fight to initiate a concurrently programmed corrective saccade.

We see the last cookie in the box and think, can I take that? We reach a hand out. In the 2.1 seconds that this impulse travels through our brain, billions of neurons communicate with one another, sending blips of voltage through our sensory and motor regions. Neuroscientists call these blips “spikes.” Spikes enable us to do everything: talk, eat, run, see, plan, and decide. In The Spike, Mark Humphries takes readers on the epic journey of a spike through a single, brief reaction. In vivid language, Humphries tells the story of what happens in our brain, what we know about spikes, and what we still have left to understand about them. Drawing on decades of research in neuroscience, Humphries explores how spikes are born, how they are transmitted, and how they lead us to action. He dives into previously unanswered mysteries: Why are most neurons silent? What causes neurons to fire spikes spontaneously, without input from other neurons or the outside world? Why do most spikes fail to reach any destination? Humphries presents a new vision of the brain, one where fundamental computations are carried out by spontaneous spikes that predict what will happen in the world, helping us to perceive, decide, and react quickly enough for our survival. Traversing neuroscience’s expansive terrain, The Spike follows a single electrical response to illuminate how our extraordinary brains work.

Age-associated dementias are neuropathologically characterized by the identification of hallmark intracellular and extracellular deposition of proteins, i.e., hyperphosphorylated-tau, amyloid-β, and α-synuclein, or cerebrovascular lesions. The neuropathological assessment and staging of these pathologies allows for a diagnosis of a distinct disease, e.g., amyloid-β plaques and hyperphosphorylated tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropathological assessment in large scale cohorts, such as the UK’s Brains for Dementia Research (BDR) programme, has made it increasingly clear that the ageing brain is characterized by the presence of multiple age-associated pathologies rather than just the ‘pure’ hallmark lesion as commonly perceived. These additional pathologies can range from low/intermediate levels, that are assumed to have little if any clinical significance, to a full-blown mixed disease where there is the presence of two distinct diseases. In our recent paper (McAleese et al. 2021 Concomitant neurodegenerative pathologies contribute to the transition from mild cognitive impairment to dementia, https://alz-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/alz.12291, Alzheimer's & Dementia), using the BDR cohort, we investigated the frequency of multimorbidity and specifically investigated the impact of additional low-level pathology on cognition. In this study, of 670 donated post-mortem brains, we found that almost 70% of cases exhibited multimorbidity and only 22% were considered a pure diagnosis. Importantly, no case of Lewy Body dementia or vascular dementia was considered pure. A key finding is that the presence of low levels of additional pathology increased the likelihood of having mild dementia vs mild cognitive impairment by almost 20-fold, indicating low levels of additional pathology do impact the clinical progression of a distinct disease. Given the high prevalence and the potential clinical impact, cerebral multimorbidity should be at the forefront of consideration in dementia research.

Coordinated activity across networks of neurons is a hallmark of both resting and active behavioral states in many species, including worms, flies, fish, mice and humans. These global patterns alter energy metabolism in the brain over seconds to hours, making oxygen consumption and glucose uptake widely used proxies of neural activity. However, whether changes in neural activity are causally related to changes in metabolic flux in intact circuits on the sub-second timescales associated with behavior, is unclear. Moreover, it is unclear whether differences between rest and action are associated with spatiotemporally structured changes in neuronal energy metabolism at the subcellular level. My work combines two-photon microscopy across the fruit fly brain with sensors that allow simultaneous measurements of neural activity and metabolic flux, across both resting and active behavioral states. It demonstrates that neural activity drives changes in metabolic flux, creating a tight coupling between these signals that can be measured across large-scale brain networks. Further, using local optogenetic perturbation, I show that even transient increases in neural activity result in rapid and persistent increases in cytosolic ATP, suggesting that neuronal metabolism predictively allocates resources to meet the energy demands of future neural activity. Finally, these studies reveal that the initiation of even minimal behavioral movements causes large-scale changes in the pattern of neural activity and energy metabolism, revealing unexpectedly widespread engagement of the central brain.

Traditionally, the dorsolateral geniculate nucleus (dLGN) of the thalamus has been considered a feedforward relay station for retinal signals to reach primary visual cortex. The local and long-range circuits of dLGN, however, suggest that this view is not correct. Indeed, besides the thalamo-cortical relay cells, dLGN contains local inhibitory interneurons, and receives not only feedforward input from the retina, but also massive direct and indirect feedback from primary visual cortex. Furthermore, it is one of the earliest processing stages in the visual system that integrates visual information with neuromodulatory signals.

Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. Modern day “neurohackers” are radically self-experimenting, attempting genomic modification with CRISPR-Cas9 constructs and electrode insertion into their cortex amongst a host of other things. Institutions wanting to avoid the risks bought on by these procedures, generally avoid involvement with self-experimenting research. But what is the ethical thing to do? Should researchers be allowed or encouraged to self-experiment? Should institutions support or hinder them? Where do you think that this process of self-experimentation could take us? This presentation by Dr Matt Lennon and Professor Zoltan Molnar of the University of Oxford, will explore the history, future and ethics of self-experimentation. It will explore notable examples of self-experimenters including Isaac Newton, Angelo Ruffini and Oliver Sacks and how a number of these pivotal experiments created paradigm shifts in neuroscience. The presentation will open up a forum for all participants to be involved asking key ethical questions around what should and should not be allowed in self-experimentation research.

Maintaining average activity level within a set-point range constitutes a fundamental property of central neural circuits. Accumulated evidence suggests that firing rate distributions and their means represent physiological variables regulated by homeostatic systems during sleep-wake cycle in central neural circuits. While intracellular Ca2+ has long been hypothesized as a feedback control signal, the source of Ca2+ and the molecular machinery enabling network-wide homeostatic responses remain largely unknown. I will present our hypothesis and framework on identifying homeostatic regulators in neural circuits. Next, I will show our new results on the role of mitochondria in the regulation of activity set-points and feedback responses. Finally, I will provide an evidence on state-dependent dysregulation of activity set-points at the presymptomatic disease stage in familial Alzheimer’s models.

Every autumn, monarch butterflies migrate from North America to their overwintering sites in Central Mexico. To maintain their southward direction, these butterflies rely on celestial cues as orientation references. The position of the sun combined with additional skylight cues are integrated in the central complex, a region in the butterfly’s brain that acts as an internal compass. However, the central complex does not solely guide the butterflies on their migration but also helps monarchs in their non-migratory form manoeuvre on foraging trips through their habitat. By comparing the activity of input neurons of the central complex between migratory and non-migratory butterflies, we investigated how a different lifestyle affects the coding of orientation information in the brain.

To understand how the brain can perform complex tasks such as perception, we have to understand how information enters the brain, how it is transformed and how it is transferred. But, how do we measure information transfer in the brain? This presentation will start with a general introduction of what mutual information is and how to measure it in an experimental setup. Next, the talk will focus on how this can be used to develop brain models at different (spatial) levels, from the microscopic single neuron level to the macroscopic network and behavioural level. How can we incorporate the knowledge about single neurons, that already show complex dynamics, into network activity and link this to behaviour?

During natural behavior animals dynamically switch between different behaviors, yet little is known about how the brain performs behavioral-switches. Navigation is a complex dynamic behavior that enables testing these kind of behavioral switches: It requires the animal to know its own allocentric (world-centered) location within the environment, while also paying attention to incoming sudden events such as obstacles or other conspecifics – and therefore the animal may need to rapidly switch from representing its own allocentric position to egocentrically representing ‘things out-there’. Here we used an ethological task where two bats flew together in a very large environment (130 meters), and had to switch between two behaviors: (i) navigation, and (ii) obstacle-avoidance during ‘cross-over’ events with the other bat. Bats increased their echolocation click-rate before a cross-over, indicating spatial attention to the other bat. Hippocampal CA1 neurons represented the bat’s own position when flying alone (allocentric place-coding); surprisingly, when meeting the other bat, neurons switched very rapidly to jointly representing the inter-bat distance × position (egocentric × allocentric coding). This switching to a neuronal representation of the other bat was correlated on a trial-by-trial basis with the attention signal, as indexed by the bat’s echolocation calls – suggesting that sensory attention is controlling these major switches in neural coding. Interestingly, we found that in place-cells, the different place-fields of the same neuron could exhibit very different tuning to inter-bat distance – creating a non-separable coding of allocentric position × egocentric distance. Together, our results suggest that attentional switches during navigation – which in bats can be measured directly based on their echolocation signals – elicit rapid dynamics of hippocampal spatial coding. More broadly, this study demonstrates that during natural behavior, when animals often switch between different behaviors, neural circuits can rapidly and flexibly switch their core computations.