Seminars

In this webinar on spatial navigation circuits, three researchers—Ann Hermundstad, Ila Fiete, and Barbara Webb—discussed how diverse species solve navigation problems using specialized yet evolutionarily conserved brain structures. Hermundstad illustrated the fruit fly’s central complex, focusing on how hardwired circuit motifs (e.g., sinusoidal steering curves) enable rapid, flexible learning of goal-directed navigation. This framework combines internal heading representations with modifiable goal signals, leveraging activity-dependent plasticity to adapt to new environments. Fiete explored the mammalian head-direction system, demonstrating how population recordings reveal a one-dimensional ring attractor underlying continuous integration of angular velocity. She showed that key theoretical predictions—low-dimensional manifold structure, isometry, uniform stability—are experimentally validated, underscoring parallels to insect circuits. Finally, Webb described honeybee navigation, featuring path integration, vector memories, route optimization, and the famous waggle dance. She proposed that allocentric velocity signals and vector manipulation within the central complex can encode and transmit distances and directions, enabling both sophisticated foraging and inter-bee communication via dance-based cues.

This talk will focus on the importance of using natural behaviors in neuroscience research – the “Natural Neuroscience” approach. I will illustrate this point by describing studies of neural codes for spatial behaviors and social behaviors, in flying bats – using wireless neurophysiology methods that we developed – and will highlight new neuronal representations that we discovered in animals navigating through 3D spaces, or in very large-scale environments, or engaged in social interactions. In particular, I will discuss: (1) A multi-scale neural code for very large environments, which we discovered in bats flying in a 200-meter long tunnel. This new type of neural code is fundamentally different from spatial codes reported in small environments – and we show theoretically that it is superior for representing very large spaces. (2) Rapid modulation of position × distance coding in the hippocampus during collision-avoidance behavior between two flying bats. This result provides a dramatic illustration of the extreme dynamism of the neural code. (3) Local-but-not-global order in 3D grid cells – a surprising experimental finding, which can be explained by a simple physics-inspired model, which successfully describes both 3D and 2D grids. These results strongly argue against many of the classical, geometrically-based models of grid cells. (4) I will also briefly describe new results on the social representation of other individuals in the hippocampus, in a highly social multi-animal setting. The lecture will propose that neuroscience experiments – in bats, rodents, monkeys or humans – should be conducted under evermore naturalistic conditions.

Our group focuses on brain computation, physiology and evolution, with a particular focus on network dynamics, sleep (evolution and mechanistic underpinnings), cortical computation (through the study of ancestral cortices), and sensorimotor processing. This talk will describe our recent results on the remarkable camouflage behavior of cuttlefish (action) and on brain activity in REM and NonREM in lizards (sleep). Both topics will focus on aspects of circuit dynamics.

A wide variety of animals and some artificial agents can adapt their behavior to changing cues, contexts, and goals. But what neural network architectures support such behavioral flexibility? Agents with loosely structured network architectures and random connections can be trained over millions of trials to display flexibility in specific tasks, but many animals must adapt and learn with much less experience just to survive. Further, it has been challenging to understand how the structure of trained deep neural networks relates to their functional properties, an important objective for neuroscience. In my talk, I will use a combination of behavioral, physiological and connectomic evidence from the fly to make the case that the built-in modularity and structure of its networks incorporate key aspects of the animal’s ecological niche, enabling rapid flexibility by constraining learning to operate on a restricted parameter set. It is not unlikely that this is also a feature of many biological neural networks across other animals, large and small, and with and without vertebrae.

Many flexible behaviors are thought to rely on internal representations of an animal’s spatial relationship to its environment and of the consequences of its actions in that environment. While such representations—e.g. of head direction and value—have been extensively studied, how they are combined to guide behavior is not well understood. I will discuss how we are exploring these questions using a classical visual learning paradigm for the fly. I’ll begin by describing a simple policy that, when tethered to an internal representation of heading, captures structured behavioral variability in this task. I’ll describe how ambiguities in the fly’s visual surroundings affect its perception and, when coupled to this policy, manifest in predictable changes in behavior. Informed by newly-released connectomic data, I’ll then discuss how these computations might be carried out and combined within specific circuits in the fly’s central brain, and how perception and action might interact to shape individual differences in learning performance.

The songbird zebra finch is an exemplary model system in which to study trial-and-error learning, as the bird learns its single song gradually through the production of many noisy renditions. It is also a good system in which to study the maintenance of motor skills, as the adult bird actively maintains its song and retains some residual plasticity. Motor learning occurs through the association of timing within the song, represented by sparse firing in nucleus HVC, with motor output, driven by nucleus RA. Here we show through modeling that the small level of observed variability in HVC can result in a network which is more easily able to adapt to change, and is most robust to cell damage or death, than an unperturbed network. In collaboration with Carlos Lois’ lab, we also consider the effect of directly perturbing HVC through viral injection of toxins that affect the firing of projection neurons. Following these perturbations, the song is profoundly affected but is able to almost perfectly recover. We characterize the changes in song acoustics and syntax, and propose models for HVC architecture and plasticity that can account for some of the observed effects. Finally, we suggest a potential role for inputs from nucleus Uva in helping to control timing precision in HVC.

In a cross wind, the direction a fly moves through the air may differ from its heading direction, the direction defined by its body axis. I will present a model based on experimental results that reveals how a heading direction “compass” signal is combined with optic flow to compute and represent the direction that a fly is traveling. This provides a general framework for understand how flies perform vector computations.

Animals are able to perceive self-motion and navigate in their environment using optic flow information. They often perform visually guided stabilization behaviors like the optokinetic (OKR) or optomotor response (OMR) in order to maintain their eye and body position relative to the moving surround. But how does the animal manage to perform appropriate behavioral response and how are processing tasks divided between the various non-cortical visual brain areas? Experiments have shown that the zebrafish pretectum, which is homologous to the mammalian accessory optic system, is involved in the OKR and OMR. The optic tectum (superior colliculus in mammals) is involved in processing of small stimuli, e.g. during prey capture. We have previously shown that many pretectal neurons respond selectively to rotational or translational motion. These neurons are likely detectors for specific optic flow patterns and mediate behavioral choices of the animal based on optic flow information. We investigate the motion feature extraction of brain structures that receive input from retinal ganglion cells to identify the visual computations that underlie behavioral decisions during prey capture, OKR, OMR and other visually mediate behaviors. Our study of receptive fields shows that receptive field sizes in pretectum (large) and tectum (small) are very different and that pretectal responses are diverse and anatomically organized. Since calcium indicators are slow and receptive fields for motion stimuli are difficult to measure, we also develop novel stimuli and statistical methods to infer the neuronal computations of visual brain areas.

Olfactory navigation provides a tractable model for studying the circuit basis of sensori-motor transformations and goal-directed behaviour. Macroscopic organisms typically navigate in odor plumes that provide a noisy and uncertain signal about the location of an odor source. Work in many species has suggested that animals accomplish this task by combining temporal processing of dynamic odor information with an estimate of wind direction. Our lab has been using adult walking Drosophila to understand both the computational algorithms and the neural circuits that support navigation in a plume of attractive food odor. We developed a high-throughput paradigm to study behavioural responses to temporally-controlled odor and wind stimuli. Using this paradigm we found that flies respond to a food odor (apple cider vinegar) with two behaviours: during the odor they run upwind, while after odor loss they perform a local search. A simple computational model based one these two responses is sufficient to replicate many aspects of fly behaviour in a natural turbulent plume. In on-going work, we are seeking to identify the neural circuits and biophysical mechanisms that perform the computations delineated by our model. Using electrophysiology, we have identified mechanosensory neurons that compute wind direction from movements of the two antennae and central mechanosensory neurons that encode wind direction are are involved in generating a stable downwind orientation. Using optogenetic activation, we have traced olfactory circuits capable of evoking upwind orientation and offset search from the periphery, through the mushroom body and lateral horn, to the central complex. Finally, we have used optogenetic activation, in combination with molecular manipulation of specific synapses, to localize temporal computations performed on the odor signal to olfactory transduction and transmission at specific synapses. Our work illustrates how the tools available in fruit fly can be applied to dissect the mechanisms underlying a complex goal-directed behaviour.