Seminars

Aggression is an ethologically complex behavior with equally complex underlying mechanisms. Here, I present data on one form of aggression, appetitive or rewarding aggression, and the behavioral, cellular and system-level mechanisms guiding this behavior. First, I will present one way in which appetitive aggression is modeled in mice, and extend aggression motivation to the concept of compulsive aggression seeking and relapse. I will then briefly highlight recent advances in computer vision and machine learning for automated scoring of aggressive behavior, the role of specific cell-types in controlling aggression reward, and close with preliminary data on the whole brain aggression reward functional connectome using light sheet fluorescent microscopy (LSFM).

Everything we see has a location. We know where things are before we know what they are. But how do we know where things are? Receptive fields in the visual system specify location but neural delays lead to serious errors whenever targets or eyes are moving. Motion may be the problem here but motion can also be the solution, correcting for the effects of delays and eye movements. To demonstrate this, I will present results from three motion illusions where perceived location differs radically from physical location. These help understand how and where position is coded. We first look at the effects of a target’s simple forward motion on its perceived location. Second, we look at perceived location of a target that has internal motion as well as forward motion. The two directions combine to produce an illusory path. This “double-drift” illusion strongly affects perceived position but, surprisingly, not eye movements or attention. Even more surprising, fMRI shows that the shifted percept does not emerge in the visual cortex but is seen instead in the frontal lobes. Finally, we report that a moving frame also shifts the perceived positions of dots flashed within it. Participants report the dot positions relative to the frame, as if the frame were not moving. These frame-induced position effects suggest a link to visual stability where we see a steady world despite massive displacements during saccades. These motion-based effects on perceived location lead to new insights concerning how and where position is coded in the brain.

Gestational exposure to environmental toxins, infections, and stressors are epidemiologically linked to neurodevelopmental disorders with strong male-bias, such as autism spectrum disorder. We modeled some of these prenatal risk factors in mice, by co-exposing pregnant dams to an environmental pollutant and limited-resource stress, which robustly dysregulated the maternal immune system. Male but not female offspring displayed long-lasting behavioral abnormalities and alterations in the activity of brain networks encoding social interactions, along with disruptions of gut structure and microbiome composition. Cellularly, prenatal stressors impaired microglial synaptic pruning in males during early postnatal development. Precise inhibition of microglial phagocytosis during the same critical period mimicked the impact of prenatal stressors on the male-specific social deficits. Conversely, modifying the gut microbiome rescued the social and cellular deficits, indicating that environmental stressors alter neural circuit formation in males via impairing microglia function during development, perhaps via a gut-brain disruption.

Chromosomes are extremely long, active polymers that are spatially organized across multiple scales to promote cellular functions, such as gene transcription and genetic inheritance. During each cell cycle, chromosomes are dramatically compacted as cells divide and dynamically reorganized into less compact, spatiotemporally patterned structures after cell division. These activities are facilitated by DNA/chromatin-binding protein motors called SMC complexes. Each of these motors can perform a unique activity known as “loop extrusion,” in which the motor binds the DNA/chromatin polymer, reels in the polymer fiber, and extrudes it as a loop. Using simulations and theory, I show how loop-extruding motors can collectively compact and spatially organize chromosomes in different scenarios. First, I show that loop-extruding complexes can generate sufficient compaction for cell division, provided that loop-extrusion satisfies stringent physical requirements. Second, while loop-extrusion alone does not uniquely spatially pattern the genome, interactions between SMC complexes and protein “boundary elements” can generate patterns that emerge in the genome after cell division. Intriguingly, these “boundary elements” are not necessarily stationary, which can generate a variety of patterns in the neighborhood of transcriptionally active genes. These predictions, along with supporting experiments, show how SMC complexes and other molecular machinery, such as RNA polymerase, can spatially organize the genome. More generally, this work demonstrates both the versatility of the loop extrusion mechanism for chromosome functional organization and how seemingly subtle microscopic effects can emerge in the spatiotemporal structure of nonequilibrium polymers.

Large-scale, single neuron resolution recordings are inherently high-dimensional, with as many dimensions as neurons. To make sense of them, for many the answer is: reduce the number of dimensions. In this talk I argue we can distinguish weak and strong principles of neural dimension reduction. The weak principle is that dimension reduction is a convenient tool for making sense of complex neural data. The strong principle is that dimension reduction moves us closer to how neural circuits actually operate and compute. Elucidating these principles is crucial, for which we subscribe to provides radically different interpretations of the same dimension reduction techniques applied to the same data. I outline experimental evidence for each principle, but illustrate how we could make either the weak or strong principles appear to be true based on innocuous looking analysis decisions. These insights suggest arguments over low and high-dimensional neural activity need better constraints from both experiment and theory.

In an ever-changing environment, uncertainty is omnipresent. To deal with this, organisms have evolved mechanisms that allow them to take advantage of environmental regularities in order to make decisions robustly and adjust their behavior efficiently, thus maximizing their chances of survival. In this talk, I will present behavioral evidence that animals perform model-based state inference to predict environmental state changes and adjust their behavior rapidly, rather than slowly updating choice values. This model-based inference process can be described using Bayesian change-point models. Furthermore, I will show that neural populations in the prefrontal cortex accurately predict behavioral switches, and that the activity of these populations is associated with Bayesian estimates. In addition, we will see that learning leads to the emergence of a high-dimensional representational subspace that can be reused when the animals re-learn a previously learned set of action-value associations. Altogether, these findings highlight the role of the PFC in representing a belief about the current state of the world.

We must constantly adapt the rules we use to guide our attention. To understand how the brain learns these rules, we designed a novel task that required monkeys to learn which color is the most rewarded at a given time (the current rule). However, just as in real life, the monkey was never explicitly told the rule. Instead, they had to learn it through trial and error by choosing a color, receiving feedback (amount of reward), and then updating their internal rule. After the monkeys reached a behavioral criterion, the rule changed. This change was not cued but could be inferred based on reward feedback. Behavioral modeling found monkeys used rewards to learn the rules. After the rule changed, animals adopted one of two strategies. If the change was small, reflected in a small reward prediction error, the animals continuously updated their rule. However, for large changes, monkeys ‘reset’ their belief about the rule and re-learned the rule from scratch. To understand the neural correlates of learning new rules, we recorded neurons simultaneously from the prefrontal and parietal cortex. We found that the strength of the rule representation increased with the certainty about the current rule, and that the certainty about the rule was represented both implicitly and explicitly in the population.

Electro- and magneto-encephalography (EEG/MEG) are the leading methods to non-invasively record human neural dynamics with millisecond temporal resolution. However, it can be extremely difficult to infer the underlying cellular and circuit level origins of these macro-scale signals without simultaneous invasive recordings. This limits the translation of E/MEG into novel principles of information processing, or into new treatment modalities for neural pathologies. To address this need, we developed the Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN: https://hnn.brown/edu ), a new user-friendly neural modeling tool designed to help researchers and clinicians interpret human imaging data. A unique feature of HNN’s model is that it accounts for the biophysics generating the primary electric currents underlying such data, so simulation results are directly comparable to source localized data. HNN is being constructed with workflows of use to study some of the most commonly measured E/MEG signals including event related potentials, and low frequency brain rhythms. In this talk, I will give an overview of this new tool and describe an application to study the origin and meaning of 15-29Hz beta frequency oscillations, known to be important for sensory and motor function. Our data showed that in primary somatosensory cortex these oscillations emerge as transient high power ‘events’. Functionally relevant differences in averaged power reflected a difference in the number of high-power beta events per trial (“rate”), as opposed to changes in event amplitude or duration. These findings were consistent across detection and attention tasks in human MEG, and in local field potentials from mice performing a detection task. HNN modeling led to a new theory on the circuit origin of such beta events and suggested beta causally impacts perception through layer specific recruitment of cortical inhibition, with support from invasive recordings in animal models and high-resolution MEG in humans. In total, HNN provides an unpresented biophysically principled tool to link mechanism to meaning of human E/MEG signals.