Seminars

If we want good work to get done, we should credit those who do it. In science, researchers are credited predominantly via authorship on publications. But many contributions to modern research are not recognized with authorship, due in part to the high bar imposed by the authorship criteria of many journals. “Contributorship” is a more inclusive framework for indicating who did what in the work described by a paper, and many scientific journals have recently implemented versions of it. I will consider the motivation for and specifics of this change, describe the tenzing tool we created to facilitate it, and how we might want to support and shape the shift toward contributorship

“Call me a marine vision scientist. Some years ago - never mind how long precisely - having little or no money in my purse, and nothing particular to interest me on shore, I thought I would sail about a little and see what animals see in the watery part of the world. It is a way I have of dividing off the spectrum, and regulating circular polarisation.” Sometimes I wish I had just set out to harpoon a white whale as it would have been easier than studying stomatopod (mantis shrimp) vision. Nowhere near as much fun of course and certainly less dangerous so in this presentation I track the history of discovery and confusion that stomatopods deliver in trying to understand what the do actually see. The talk unashamedly borrows from that of Mike Bok a few weeks ago (April 13th 2021 “The Blurry Beginnings: etc” talk) as an introduction to the system (do go look at his talk again, it is beautiful!) and goes both backwards and forwards in time, trying to provide an explanation for the design of this visual system. The journey is again one of retinal anatomy and physiology, neuroanatomy, electrophysiology, behaviour and body ornaments but this time focusses more on polarisation vision (Mike covered the colour stuff well). There is a comparative section looking at the cephalopods too and by the end, I hope you will understand where we are at with trying to understand this extraordinary way of seeing the world and why we ‘pod-people’ wave our arms around so much when asked to explain; what do stomatopods see? Maybe, to butcher another quote: “mantis shrimp have been rendered visually beautiful for vision’s sake.”

Environmental insults alter brain function and behaviour inboth rodents and people. One putative underlying mechanism that has receivedsubstantial attention recently is the gut microbiota, the ecosystem ofsymbiotic microorganisms that populate the intestinal tract, which is known toplay a role in brain health and function via the gut-brain axis. Two keyenvironmental insults known to affect both brain function and behaviour, andthe gut microbiome, are poor diet and psychological stress. While there isstrong evidence for interactions between the microbiome and host physiology inthe context of chronic stress, little is known about the role of the microbiomein the host response to acute stress. Determining the underlying mechanisms bywhich stress may provoke functional changes in the gut and brain is criticalfor developing therapeutics to alleviate adverse consequences of traumaticstress.

OpenFlexure is a 3D printed flexure translation stage, developed by a group at the Bath University. The stage is capable of sub-micron-scale motion, with very small drift over time. Which makes it quite good, among other things, for time-lapse protocols that need to be done over days/weeks time, and under space restricted areas, such as fume hoods.

In this talk I outline the technical challenges and current solutions to layer fMRI. Specifically, I describe our acquisition strategies for maximizing resolution, spatial coverage, time efficiency as well as, perhaps most importantly, vascular specificity. Novel applications from our group, including mapping feedforward and feedback connections to M1 during task and sensory input modulation and S1 during a sensory prediction task are be shown. Layer specific activity in dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex during a working memory task is also demonstrated. Additionally, I’ll show preliminary work on mapping whole brain layer-specific resting state connectivity and hierarchy.

Personalised medicine will be greatly enhanced with the introduction of new radiopharmaceuticals for the diagnosis and treatment of various cancers, as well as cardiovascular disease and brain disorders. The unprecedented interest in developing theranostic radiopharmaceuticals is mainly due to the recent clinical successes of radiometal-based products including: • 177LuDOTA-TATE (trade name Lutathera, FDA approved in 2018), a peptide-based tracer that is used for treating metastatic neuroendocrine tumours • Ga 68 PSMA-11 (FDA approved in 2020), a positron emission tomography agent for imaging prostate-specific membrane antigen positive lesions in men with prostate cancer. In this webinar, Dr Brett Paterson and PhD candidate Mr Cormac Kelderman will present their research on developing the chemistry and radiochemistry to produce new radiometal-based imaging and therapy agents. They will discuss the synthesis of new molecules, the optimisation of the radiochemistry, and results from preclinical evaluations. Dr Brett Paterson is a National Imaging Facility Fellow at Monash Biomedical Imaging and academic group leader in the School of Chemistry, Monash University. His research focuses on the development of radiochemistry and new radiopharmaceuticals. Cormac Kelderman is a PhD candidate under the supervision of Dr Brett Paterson in the School of Chemistry, Monash University. His research focuses on developing new bis(thiosemicarbazone) chelators for technetium-99m SPECT imaging.

In recent years, communicating one’s research to audiences outside of academia has grown in importance and time commitment for many researchers. Science Slams or University Open Days reliably draw large crowds, and the potential of social media to amplify any message has made it possible to reach interested recipients without the traditional press as a middleman. In this presentation, I will provide insights into science communication from my perspective as a neuroscience researcher, who enjoys spreading the word about how amazing insect brains are. We will have a look at the What?, Why? and How? of science communication. What do we generally mean by the term, and what forms can it take? Why should – or must – we engage in it? And how can we best achieve our aims with it? I will provide an overview of the current communication landscape, some food for (critical) thought, and many practical tips that help me when preparing to share my science with a wider audience.

This talk will focus on the idea that the kind of similarity driving analogical retrieval is determined by the kind of features encoded regarding the source and the target cue situations. Emphasis will be put on educational perspectives in order to show the influence of world semantics on learners’ problem representations and solving strategies, as well as the difficulties arising from semantic incongruence between representations and strategies. Special attention will be given to the recoding of semantically incongruent representations, a crucial step that learners struggle with, in order to illustrate a promising path for going beyond informal strategies.

Detection of motion is essential for survival, but how the visual system processes moving stimuli is not fully understood. Here, based on a detailed analysis of glutamate release from bipolar cells, we outline the rules that govern the representation of object motion in the early processing stages. Our main findings are as follows: (1) Motion processing begins already at the first retinal synapse. (2) The shape and the amplitude of motion responses cannot be reliably predicted from bipolar cell responses to stationary objects. (3) Enhanced representation of novel objects - particularly in bipolar cells with transient dynamics. (4) Response amplitude in bipolar cells matches visual salience reported in humans: suddenly appearing objects > novel motion > existing motion. These findings can be explained by antagonistic interactions in the center-surround receptive field, demonstrate that despite their simple operational concepts, classical center-surround receptive fields enable sophisticated visual computations.

Large scale genetic studies and associated functional investigations have tremendously augmented our knowledge about the mechanisms underlying epileptic seizures, and sometimes also accompanying developmental problems. Pharmacotherapy of the epilepsies is routinely guided by trial and error, since predictors for a response to specific antiepileptic drugs are largely missing. The recent advances in the field of genetic epilepsies now offer an increasing amount of either well fitting established or new re-purposing therapies for genetic epilepsy syndromes based on understanding of the pathophysiological principles. Examples are provided by variants in ion channel or transporter encoding genes which cause a broad spectrum of epilepsy syndromes of variable severity and onset, (1) the ketogenic diet for glucose transporter defects of the blood-brain barrier, (2) Na+ channel blockers (e.g. carbamazepine) for gain-of-function Na+ channel mutations and avoidance of those drugs for loss-of-function mutations, and (3) specific K+ channel blockers for mutations with a gain-of-function defect in respective K+ channels. I will focus in my talk on the latter two including the underlying mechanisms, their relation to clinical phenotypes and possible therapeutic implications. In conclusion, genetic and mechanistic studies offer promising tools to predict therapeutic effects in rare epilepsies.

Filaments (slender, microscopic elastic bodies) are prevalent in biological and industrial settings. In the biological case, the filaments are often active, in that they are driven internally by motor proteins, with the prime examples being cilia and flagella. For cilia in particular, which can appear in dense arrays, their resulting motions are coupled through the surrounding fluid, as well as through surfaces to which they are attached. In this talk, I present numerical simulations exploring the coordinated motion of active filaments and how it depends on the driving force, density of filaments, as well as the attached surface. In particular, we find that when the surface is spherical, its topology introduces local defects in coordinated motion which can then feedback and alter the global state. This is particularly true when the surface is not held fixed and is free to move in the surrounding fluid. These simulations take advantage of a computational framework we developed for fully 3D filament motion that combines unit quaternions, implicit geometric time integration, quasi-Newton methods, and fast, matrix-free methods for hydrodynamic interactions and it will also be presented.

To act effectively and flexibly in an imperfectly predictable environment with only incomplete and unreliable sensory information, animals must learn to form and compute with internal representations that reflect their necessarily uncertain beliefs about the state of the world. The optimal approach to handling uncertainty is rooted in Bayesian probability, and indeed humans and other animals often approach Bayes optimality with a degree of robustness and flexibility that continues to evade artificial systems. However, the question of how neural circuits organise to achieve this performance remains one of the fundamental mysteries of neuroscience. I will discuss a series of models built around the idea that distributional information is naturally encoded in a distributed fashion by neural population firing rates that converge on the mean values of non-linear functions of state. We will see that such representations emerge naturally in task-optimised systems, and also provide a simple and effective substrate for unsupervised learning. Finally, I will sketch ongoing work that links the emergence of such representations to the architecture of recurrent neural circuits. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2021-07-07. Recording duration: 00:52:28.

Goal-directed navigation requires precise estimates of spatial relationships between current position and future goal, as well as planning of an associated route or action. While neurons in the hippocampal formation can represent the animal’s position and nearby trajectories, their role in determining the animal’s destination or action has been questioned. We thus hypothesize that brain regions outside the hippocampal formation may play complementary roles in navigation, particularly for guiding goal-directed behaviours based on the brain’s internal cognitive map. In this seminar, I will first describe a subpopulation of neurons in the retrosplenial cortex (RSC) that increase their firing when the animal approaches environmental boundaries, such as walls or edges. This boundary coding is independent of direct visual or tactile sensation but instead depends on inputs from the medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) that contains spatial tuning cells, such as grid cells or border cells. However, unlike MEC border cells, we found that RSC border cells encode environmental boundaries in a self-centred egocentric coordinate frame, which may allow an animal for efficient avoidance from approaching walls or edges during navigation. I will then discuss whether the brain can possess a precise estimate of remote target location during active environmental exploration. Such a spatial code has not been described in the hippocampal formation. However, we found that neurons in the rat orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) form spatial representations that persistently point to the animal’s subsequent goal destination throughout navigation. This destination coding emerges before navigation onset without direct sensory access to a distal goal, and are maintained via destination-specific neural ensemble dynamics. These findings together suggest key roles for extra-hippocampal regions in spatial navigation, enabling animals to choose appropriate actions toward a desired destination by avoiding possible dangers.

A diverse mix of neurotechnology talks from academic and industry colleagues plus presentations from our MRes Neurotechnology students. Visit our event page to find out more and register now!

Visual knowledge obtained from our lifelong experience of the world plays a critical role in our ability to build short-term memories. We propose a mechanistic explanation of how working memory (WM) representations are built from the latent representations of visual knowledge and can then be reconstructed. The proposed model, Memory for Latent Representations (MLR), features a variational autoencoder with an architecture that corresponds broadly to the human visual system and an activation-based binding pool of neurons that binds items’ attributes to tokenized representations. The simulation results revealed that shape information for stimuli that the model was trained on, can be encoded and retrieved efficiently from latents in higher levels of the visual hierarchy. On the other hand, novel patterns that are completely outside the training set can be stored from a single exposure using only latents from early layers of the visual system. Moreover, the representation of a given stimulus can have multiple codes, representing specific visual features such as shape or color, in addition to categorical information. Finally, we validated our model by testing a series of predictions against behavioral results acquired from WM tasks. The model provides a compelling demonstration of visual knowledge yielding the formation of compact visual representation for efficient memory encoding.