Seminars

Using videos from the Deepfake Detection Challenge (cf. Groh et al., 2021), we investigated human deepfake detection performance (DDP) in two unique observer groups: Super-Recognizers (SRs) and "normal" officers from within the 18K members of the Berlin Police. SRs were identified either via previously proposed lab-based procedures (Ramon, 2021) or the only existing tool for SR identification involving increasingly challenging, authentic forensic material: beSure® (Berlin Test For Super-Recognizer Identification; Ramon & Rjosk, 2022). Across two experiments we examined deepfake detection performance (DDP) in participants who judged single videos and pairs of videos in a 2AFC decision setting. We explored speed-accuracy trade-offs in DDP, compared DDP between lab-identified SRs and non-SRs, and police officers whose face identity processing skills had been extensively tested using challenging. In this talk I will discuss our surprising findings and argue that further work is needed too determine whether face identity processing is related to DDP or not.

We build upon and expand the efficient coding and predictive information models of neurons, presenting a novel perspective that neurons not only predict but also actively influence their future inputs through their outputs. We introduce the concept of neurons as feedback controllers of their environments, a role traditionally considered computationally demanding, particularly when the dynamical system characterizing the environment is unknown. By harnessing a novel data-driven control framework, we illustrate the feasibility of biological neurons functioning as effective feedback controllers. This innovative approach enables us to coherently explain various experimental findings that previously seemed unrelated. Our research has profound implications, potentially revolutionizing the modeling of neuronal circuits and paving the way for the creation of alternative, biologically inspired artificial neural networks.

Seizure suppression by deep brain stimulation (DBS) applies high frequency stimulation (HFS) to grey matter to block seizures. In this presentation, I will present the results of a different method that employs low frequency stimulation (LFS) (1 to 10Hz) of white matter tracts to prevent seizures. The approach has been shown to be effective in the hippocampus by stimulating the ventral and dorsal hippocampal commissure in both animal and human studies respectively for mesial temporal lobe seizures. A similar stimulation paradigm has been shown to be effective at controlling focal cortical seizures in rats with corpus callosum stimulation. This stimulation targets the axons of the corpus callosum innervating the focal zone at low frequencies (5 to 10Hz) and has been shown to significantly reduce both seizure and spike frequency. The mechanisms of this suppression paradigm have been elucidated with in-vitro studies and involve the activation of two long-lasting inhibitory potentials GABAB and sAHP. LFS mechanisms are similar in both hippocampus and cortical brain slices. Additionally, the results show that LFS does not block seizures but rather decreases the excitability of the tissue to prevent seizures. Three methods of seizure suppression, LFS applied to fiber tracts, HFS applied to focal zone and stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (ANT) were compared directly in the same animal in an in-vivo epilepsy model. The results indicate that LFS generated a significantly higher level of suppression, indicating LFS of white matter tract could be a useful addition as a stimulation paradigm for the treatment of epilepsy.

Animals and humans rapidly adapt their behavior to dynamic environmental changes, such as predator threats or fluctuating food resources, often without immediate rewards. Existing literature posits that animals rely on internal representations of the environment, termed “beliefs”, for their decision policy. However, previous work ties belief updates to external reward signals, which does not explain adaptation in scenarios where trial-and-error approaches are inefficient or potentially perilous. In this work, we propose that the brain utilize dynamic representations that continuously infer the state of the environment, allowing it to update behavior rapidly. I will present a Bayesian theory for state inference in a partially observed Markov Decision Process with multiple interacting latent variables. Optimal behavior requires knowledge of hidden interactions between latent states. I will show that recurrent neural networks trained through reinforcement solve the task by learning the hidden interaction between latent states, and their activity encodes the dynamics of the optimal Bayesian estimators. The behavior of rodents trained on an identical task aligns with our theoretical model and neural network simulations, suggesting that the brain utilizes dynamic internal state representation and inference. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2024-01-31. Recording duration: 00:51:21.

In the real world, object arrangement follows a number of rules. Some of the rules pertain to the spatial relations between objects and scenes (i.e., syntactic rules) and others about the contextual relations (i.e., semantic rules). Research has shown that violation of semantic rules influences interval timing with the duration of scenes containing such violations to be overestimated as compared to scenes with no violations. However, no study has yet investigated whether both semantic and syntactic violations can affect timing in the same way. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the effect of scene violations on timing is due to attentional or other cognitive accounts. Using an oddball paradigm and real-world scenes with or without semantic and syntactic violations, we conducted two experiments on whether time dilation will be obtained in the presence of any type of scene violation and the role of attention in any such effect. Our results from Experiment 1 showed that time dilation indeed occurred in the presence of syntactic violations, while time compression was observed for semantic violations. In Experiment 2, we further investigated whether these estimations were driven by attentional accounts, by utilizing a contrast manipulation of the target objects. The results showed that an increased contrast led to duration overestimation for both semantic and syntactic oddballs. Together, our results indicate that scene violations differentially affect timing due to violation processing differences and, moreover, their effect on timing seems to be sensitive to attentional manipulations such as target contrast.

Perhaps the most impressive aspect of the way the brain enables us to act on the sensory world is its flexibility. We can make a general inference about many sensory features (rating the ripeness of mangoes or avocados) and map a single stimulus onto many choices (slicing or blending mangoes). These can be thought of as flexibly mapping many (features) to one (inference) and one (feature) to many (choices) sensory inputs to actions. Both theoretical and experimental investigations of this sort of flexible sensorimotor mapping tend to treat sensory areas as relatively static. Models typically instantiate flexibility through changing interactions (or weights) between units that encode sensory features and those that plan actions. Experimental investigations often focus on association areas involved in decision-making that show pronounced modulations by cognitive processes. I will present evidence that the flexible formatting of visual information in visual cortex can support both generalized inference and choice mapping. Our results suggest that visual cortex mediates many forms of cognitive flexibility that have traditionally been ascribed to other areas or mechanisms. Further, we find that a primary difference between visual and putative decision areas is not what information they encode, but how that information is formatted in the responses of neural populations, which is related to difference in the impact of causally manipulating different areas on behavior. This scenario allows for flexibility in the mapping between stimuli and behavior while maintaining stability in the information encoded in each area and in the mappings between groups of neurons.

There are many mysteries in the universe. One of the most significant, often considered the final frontier in science, is understanding how our subjective experience, or consciousness, emerges from the collective action of neurons in biological systems. While substantial progress has been made over the past decades, a unified and widely accepted explanation of the neural mechanisms underpinning consciousness remains elusive. The field is rife with theories that frequently provide contradictory explanations of the phenomenon. To accelerate progress, we have adopted a new model of science: adversarial collaboration in team science. Our goal is to test theories of consciousness in an adversarial setting. Adversarial collaboration offers a unique way to bolster creativity and rigor in scientific research by merging the expertise of teams with diverse viewpoints. Ideally, we aim to harness collective intelligence, embracing various perspectives, to expedite the uncovering of scientific truths. In this talk, I will highlight the effectiveness (and challenges) of this approach using selected case studies, showcasing its potential to counter biases, challenge traditional viewpoints, and foster innovative thought. Through the joint design of experiments, teams incorporate a competitive aspect, ensuring comprehensive exploration of problems. This method underscores the importance of structured conflict and diversity in propelling scientific advancement and innovation.

Learning induces changes in neural activity over slow timescales. These changes can be summarized by restructuring neural population data into a three-dimensional array or tensor, of size neurons by time points by trials. Classic dimensionality reduction methods often assume that neural representations are constrained to a fixed low-dimensional latent subspace. Consequently, this view does not capture how the latent subspace could evolve over learning, nor how high-dimensional neural activity could emerge over learning. Furthermore, the link between these empirically-observed changes in neural activity as a result of learning and circuit-level changes in recurrent dynamics is unclear. In this talk I will discuss our recent efforts towards developing dimensionality reduction and data-driven modeling methods based on tensors in order to identify how neural representations change over learning. First we introduce a new tensor decomposition, sliceTCA, which is able to disentangle latent variables of multiple covariability classes that are often mixed in neural population data. We demonstrate in three datasets that sliceTCA is able to capture more behaviorally-relevant information in neural data than previous methods. Second, to probe for how circuit-level changes in neural dynamics implement the observed changes in neural activity, we develop a data-driven RNN-based framework in which the recurrent connectivity is constrained to be low tensor rank. We demonstrate that such low tensor rank RNNs (ltrRNNs) are able to capture changes in neural geometry and dynamics in motor cortical data from a motor adaptation task. Together, both sliceTCA and ltrRNN demonstrate the utility of interpretable, tensor-based methods for discovery of learning-induced changes in neural representations directly from data. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2024-01-24. Recording duration: 00:45:54.