Seminars
January 2022
What does the primary visual cortex tell us about object recognition?
Tiago Marques· MIT
Mon, Jan 24 · 13:00 UTC
Object recognition relies on the complex visual representations in cortical areas at the top of the ventral stream hierarchy. While these are thought to be derived from low-level stages of visual processing, this has not been shown, yet. Here, I describe the results of two projects exploring the contributions of primary visual cortex (V1) processing to object recognition using artificial neural networks (ANNs). First, we developed hundreds of ANN-based V1 models and evaluated how their single neurons approximate those in the macaque V1. We found that, for some models, single neurons in intermediate layers are similar to their biological counterparts, and that the distributions of their response properties approximately match those in V1. Furthermore, we observed that models that better matched macaque V1 were also more aligned with human behavior, suggesting that object recognition is derived from low-level. Motivated by these results, we then studied how an ANN’s robustness to image perturbations relates to its ability to predict V1 responses. Despite their high performance in object recognition tasks, ANNs can be fooled by imperceptibly small, explicitly crafted perturbations. We observed that ANNs that better predicted V1 neuronal activity were also more robust to adversarial attacks. Inspired by this, we developed VOneNets, a new class of hybrid ANN vision models. Each VOneNet contains a fixed neural network front-end that simulates primate V1 followed by a neural network back-end adapted from current computer vision models. After training, VOneNets were substantially more robust, outperforming state-of-the-art methods on a set of perturbations. While current neural network architectures are arguably brain-inspired, these results demonstrate that more precisely mimicking just one stage of the primate visual system leads to new gains in computer vision applications and results in better models of the primate ventral stream and object recognition behavior.
NeuroscienceSeries: NeuroLeman Network
Input and target-selective plasticity in sensory neocortex during learning
Alison Barth· Carnegie Mellon University
Mon, Jan 24 · 05:00 UTC
Behavioral experience shapes neural circuits, adding and subtracting connections between neurons that will ultimately control sensation and perception. We are using natural sensory experience to uncover basic principles of information processing in the cerebral cortex, with a focus on how sensory learning can selectively alter synaptic strength. I will discuss recent findings that differentiate reinforcement learning from sensory experience, showing rapid and selective plasticity of thalamic and inhibitory synapses within primary sensory cortex.
Choice History Bias As A Window Into Cognition And Neural Circuits
Anne Urai· Leiden University
Thu, Jan 20 · 19:30 UTC
A map of cell fate decisions in the human developing neocortex using correlative microscopy
Alexandre Baffet· Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale (Inserm)
Thu, Jan 20 · 17:00 UTC
The vestibular system: a multimodal sense
Elisa Raffaella Ferre· Birkbeck, University of London
Thu, Jan 20 · 16:00 UTC
The vestibular system plays an essential role in everyday life, contributing to a surprising range of functions from reflexes to the highest levels of perception and consciousness. Three orthogonal semicircular canals detect rotational movements of the head and the otolith organs sense translational acceleration, including the gravitational vertical. But, how vestibular signals are encoded by the human brain? We have recently combined innovative methods for eliciting virtual rotation and translation sensations with fMRI to identify brain areas representing vestibular signals. We have identified a bilateral inferior parietal, ventral premotor/anterior insula and prefrontal network and confirmed that these areas reliably possess information about the rotation and translation. We have also investigated how vestibular signals are integrated with other sensory cues to generate our perception of the external environment.
Commonly used face cognition tests yield low reliability and inconsistent performance: Implications for test design, analysis, and interpretation of individual differences data
Anna Bobak, Alex Jones· University of Stirling & Swansea University
Thu, Jan 20 · 16:00 UTC
Unfamiliar face processing (face cognition) ability varies considerably in the general population. However, the means of its assessment are not standardised, and selected laboratory tests vary between studies. It is also unclear whether 1) the most commonly employed tests are reliable, 2) participants show a degree of consistency in their performance, 3) and the face cognition tests broadly measure one underlying ability, akin to general intelligence. In this study, we asked participants to perform eight tests frequently employed in the individual differences literature. We examined the reliability of these tests, relationships between them, consistency in participants’ performance, and used data driven approaches to determine factors underpinning performance. Overall, our findings suggest that the reliability of these tests is poor to moderate, the correlations between them are weak, the consistency in participant performance across tasks is low and that performance can be broadly split into two factors: telling faces together, and telling faces apart. We recommend that future studies adjust analyses to account for stimuli (face images) and participants as random factors, routinely assess reliability, and that newly developed tests of face cognition are examined in the context of convergent validity with other commonly used measures of face cognition ability.
Going beyond the scope’
Sebastian Munck· VIB-KULeuven Center for Brain and Disease Research
Thu, Jan 20 · 16:00 UTC
Epilepsy Genetics – From Family Studies to Polygenic Risk Scores
Sam Berkovic· University of Melbourne
Thu, Jan 20 · 10:00 UTC
Whilst epilepsy may be a consequence of an acquired insult including trauma, stroke, and brain tumours, the genetic component to epilepsies has been greatly under-estimated. Considerable progress has recently occurred in the understanding of epilepsy genetics, both at a clinical genetic level and in the basic science of epilepsies. The clinical evidence for genetic components will be first briefly discussed including data from population studies, twin analyses and multiplex family studies. Initial molecular discoveries occurred via classical methods of linkage and gene identification. Recent large-scale hypothesis-free whole exome studies searching for rare variants and genome-wide association studies detecting common variants have been very rewarding. These discoveries have now impacted on clinical practice, especially in severe childhood epilepsies but increasingly so in adult patients. The “genetic background” of patients has long been posited as part of the reason that some patients have epilepsy, or perhaps why some have more severe epilepsy. This has been unmeasurable but now, with the development of polygenic risk scores, the “background” is now in the research foreground. The current and future impact of polygenic risk scores will be explored.
Neuronal RNA signatures: Regulation and Function
Valérie Hilgers, PhD· Max-Planck-Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics; Freiburg, Germany
Wed, Jan 19 · 17:00 UTC
Neurons are uniquely complex cells characterized by the expression of RNA sequences that are found in no other cell type: neuron-specific mRNA splice isoforms, circular RNAs, microRNAs, and ultra-long 3’UTRs. Although relatively little is known about how these neuronal RNA signatures control neuronal development and function, the importance of RNA-directed regulation in the brain is exemplified by its implication in neurological diseases. Our goal is to gain mechanistic and functional insight of the neuron-specific RNA landscape that drives neural function in health and disease.
A novel form of retinotopy in area V2 highlights location-dependent feature selectivity in the visual system
Madineh Sedigh-Sarvestani· Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience
Wed, Jan 19 · 16:30 UTC
Topographic maps are a prominent feature of brain organization, reflecting local and large-scale representation of the sensory surface. Traditionally, such representations in early visual areas are conceived as retinotopic maps preserving ego-centric retinal spatial location while ensuring that other features of visual input are uniformly represented for every location in space. I will discuss our recent findings of a striking departure from this simple mapping in the secondary visual area (V2) of the tree shrew that is best described as a sinusoidal transformation of the visual field. This sinusoidal topography is ideal for achieving uniform coverage in an elongated area like V2 as predicted by mathematical models designed for wiring minimization, and provides a novel explanation for stripe-like patterns of intra-cortical connections and functional response properties in V2. Our findings suggest that cortical circuits flexibly implement solutions to sensory surface representation, with dramatic consequences for large-scale cortical organization. Furthermore our work challenges the framework of relatively independent encoding of location and features in the visual system, showing instead location-dependent feature sensitivity produced by specialized processing of different features in different spatial locations. In the second part of the talk, I will propose that location-dependent feature sensitivity is a fundamental organizing principle of the visual system that achieves efficient representation of positional regularities in visual input, and reflects the evolutionary selection of sensory and motor circuits to optimally represent behaviorally relevant information. The relevant papers can be found here: V2 retinotopy (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Neuron, 2021) Location-dependent feature sensitivity (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Under Review, 2022)
The GluN2A Subunit of the NMDA Receptor and Parvalbumin Interneurons: A Possible Role in Interneuron Development
Steve Traynelis, Chad Camp· Emory University School of Medicine
Wed, Jan 19 · 16:00 UTC
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) are excitatory glutamate-gated ion channels that are expressed throughout the central nervous system. NMDARs mediate calcium entry into cells, and are involved in a host of neurological functions. The GluN2A subunit, encoded by the GRIN2A gene, is expressed by both excitatory and inhibitory neurons, with well described roles in pyramidal cells. By using Grin2a knockout mice, we show that the loss of GluN2A signaling impacts parvalbumin-positive (PV) GABAergic interneuron function in hippocampus. Grin2a knockout mice have 33% more PV cells in CA1 compared to wild type but similar cholecystokinin-positive cell density. Immunohistochemistry and electrophysiological recordings show that excess PV cells do eventually incorporate into the hippocampal network and participate in phasic inhibition. Although the morphology of Grin2a knockout PV cells is unaffected, excitability and action-potential firing properties show age-dependent alterations. Preadolescent (P20-25) PV cells have an increased input resistance, longer membrane time constant, longer action-potential half-width, a lower current threshold for depolarization-induced block of action-potential firing, and a decrease in peak action-potential firing rate. Each of these measures are corrected in adulthood, reaching wild type levels, suggesting a potential delay of electrophysiological maturation. The circuit and behavioral implications of this age-dependent PV interneuron malfunction are unknown. However, neonatal Grin2a knockout mice are more susceptible to lipopolysaccharide and febrile-induced seizures, consistent with a critical role for early GluN2A signaling in development and maintenance of excitatory-inhibitory balance. These results could provide insights into how loss-of-function GRIN2A human variants generate an epileptic phenotypes.
Stress deceleration theory: chronic adolescent stress exposure results in decelerated neurobehavioral maturation
Kshitij Jadhav· University of Cambridge
Wed, Jan 19 · 16:00 UTC
Normative development in adolescence indicates that the prefrontal cortex is still under development thereby unable to exert efficient top-down inhibitory control on subcortical regions such as the basolateral amygdala and the nucleus accumbens. This imbalance in the developmental trajectory between cortical and subcortical regions is implicated in expression of the prototypical impulsive, compulsive, reward seeking and risk-taking adolescent behavior. Here we demonstrate that a chronic mild unpredictable stress procedure during adolescence in male Wistar rats arrests the normal behavioral maturation such that they continue to express adolescent-like impulsive, hyperactive, and compulsive behaviors into late adulthood. This arrest in behavioral maturation is associated with the hypoexcitability of prelimbic cortex (PLC) pyramidal neurons and reduced PLC-mediated synaptic glutamatergic control of BLA and nucleus accumbens core (NAcC) neurons that lasts late into adulthood. At the same time stress exposure in adolescence results in the hyperexcitability of the BLA pyramidal neurons sending stronger glutamatergic projections to the NAcC. Chemogenetic reversal of the PLC hypoexcitability decreased compulsivity and improved the expression of goal-directed behavior in rats exposed to stress during adolescence, suggesting a causal role for PLC hypoexcitability in this stress-induced arrested behavioral development. (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.21.469381v1.abstract)
Brain chart for the human lifespan
Richard Bethlehem· Director of Neuroimaging, Autism Research Centre, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Wed, Jan 19 · 10:00 UTC
Over the past few decades, neuroimaging has become a ubiquitous tool in basic research and clinical studies of the human brain. However, no reference standards currently exist to quantify individual differences in neuroimaging metrics over time, in contrast to growth charts for anthropometric traits such as height and weight. Here, we built an interactive resource to benchmark brain morphology, www.brainchart.io, derived from any current or future sample of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. With the goal of basing these reference charts on the largest and most inclusive dataset available, we aggregated 123,984 MRI scans from 101,457 participants aged from 115 days post-conception through 100 postnatal years, across more than 100 primary research studies. Cerebrum tissue volumes and other global or regional MRI metrics were quantified by centile scores, relative to non-linear trajectories of brain structural changes, and rates of change, over the lifespan. Brain charts identified previously unreported neurodevelopmental milestones; showed high stability of individual centile scores over longitudinal assessments; and demonstrated robustness to technical and methodological differences between primary studies. Centile scores showed increased heritability compared to non-centiled MRI phenotypes, and provided a standardised measure of atypical brain structure that revealed patterns of neuroanatomical variation across neurological and psychiatric disorders. In sum, brain charts are an essential first step towards robust quantification of individual deviations from normative trajectories in multiple, commonly-used neuroimaging phenotypes. Our collaborative study proves the principle that brain charts are achievable on a global scale over the entire lifespan, and applicable to analysis of diverse developmental and clinical effects on human brain structure.
Response of cortical networks to optogenetic stimulation: Experiment vs. theory
Nicolas Brunel· Duke University
Wed, Jan 19 · 05:00 UTC
Optogenetics is a powerful tool that allows experimentalists to perturb neural circuits. What can we learn about a network from observing its response to perturbations? I will first describe the results of optogenetic activation of inhibitory neurons in mice cortex, and show that the results are consistent with inhibition stabilization. I will then move to experiments in which excitatory neurons are activated optogenetically, with or without visual inputs, in mice and monkeys. In some conditions, these experiments show a surprising result that the distribution of firing rates is not significantly changed by stimulation, even though firing rates of individual neurons are strongly modified. I will show in which conditions a network model of excitatory and inhibitory neurons can reproduce this feature.
Common elements: An innovative methodology for identifying effective interventions in early childhood education
Sara Baker· Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge
Tue, Jan 18 · 15:00 UTC
Evidence-based education programmes, like many clinical interventions, are multi-faceted and can be expensive to implement. In this talk I will describe an alternative: distilling the common elements across many evidence-based programmes. Published programme manuals are selected through systematic review, then extensively coded and cross-referenced. Finally, the common elements that emerge are shared with practitioners as part of a ‘library’ of practices (rather than a holistic programme manual). Although the common elements methodology has been used in the prevention and intervention sciences, this project reflects the first attempt at applying this approach to early childhood education. I will describe the common elements methods and preliminary findings from our Nuffield-funded project, in collaboration with the Early Intervention Foundation. I will discuss the challenges and opportunities we have encountered, alongside our strategies for sharing evidence with practitioners in a digestible way.
A Flash of Darkness within Dusk: Crossover inhibition in the mouse retina
Henrique Von Gersdorff· OHSU
Tue, Jan 18 · 13:00 UTC
To survive in the wild small rodents evolved specialized retinas. To escape predators, looming shadows need to be detected with speed and precision. To evade starvation, small seeds, grass, nuts and insects need to also be detected quickly. Some of these succulent seeds and insects may be camouflaged offering only low contrast targets.Moreover, these challenging tasks need to be accomplished continuously at dusk, night, dawn and daytime. Crossover inhibition is thought to be involved in enhancing contrast detectionin the microcircuits of the inner plexiform layer of the mammalian retina. The AII amacrine cells are narrow field cells that play a key role in crossover inhibition. Our lab studies the synaptic physiology that regulates glycine release from AII amacrine cellsin mouse retina. These interneurons receive excitation from rod and conebipolar cells and transmit excitation to ON-type bipolar cell terminals via gap junctions. They also transmit inhibition via multiple glycinergic synapses onto OFF bipolar cell terminals.AII amacrine cells are thus a central hub of synaptic information processing that cross links the ON and the OFF pathways. What are the functions of crossover inhibition? How does it enhance contrast detection at different ambient light levels? How is the dynamicrange, frequency response and synaptic gain of glycine release modulated by luminance levels and circadian rhythms? How is synaptic gain changed by different extracellular neuromodulators, like dopamine, and by intracellular messengers like cAMP, phosphateand Ca2+ ions from Ca2+ channels and Ca2+ stores? My talk will try to answer some of these questions and will pose additional ones. It will end with further hypothesis and speculations on the multiple roles of crossover inhibition.
Towards a More Authentic Vision of the (multi)Coding Potential of RNA
Xavier Roucou· Professor and Department Chair, Department of Biochemistry and Functional Genomics, Université de Sherbrooke & Canada Research Chair in Functional Proteomics and Discovery of Novel Proteins
Tue, Jan 18 · 10:00 UTC
Ten of thousands of open reading frames (ORFs) are hidden within transcripts. They have eluded annotations because they are either small or within unsuspected locations. These are named alternative ORFs (altORFs) or small ORFs and have recently been highlighted by innovative proteogenomic approaches, such as our OpenProt resource, revealing their existence and implications in biological functions. Due to the absence of altORFs from annotations, pathogenic mutations within these are being ignored. I will discuss our latest progress on the re-analysis of large-scale proteomics datasets to improve our knowledge of proteomic diversity, and the functional characterization of a second protein coded by the FUS gene. Finally, I will explain the need to map the coding potential of the transcriptome using artificial intelligence rather than with conventional annotations that do not capture the full translational activity of ribosomes.
Neural oscillatory models of auditory-motor interactions
Johanna Rimmele· Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Frankfurt am Main
Mon, Jan 17 · 16:00 UTC
Rethinking behavior in the light of evolution
Paul Cisek· University of Montreal
Mon, Jan 17 · 14:00 UTC