Acetylcholine modulation of short-term plasticity is critical to reliable long-term plasticity in hippocampal synapses
CA3-CA1 synapses in the hippocampus are the initial locus of episodic memory. The action of acetylcholine alters cellular excitability, modifies neuronal networks, and triggers secondary signaling that directly affects long-term plasticity (LTP) (the cellular underpinning of memory). It is therefore considered a critical regulator of learning and memory in the brain. Its action via M4 metabotropic receptors in the presynaptic terminal of the CA3 neurons and M1 metabotropic receptors in the postsynaptic spines of CA1 neurons produce rich dynamics across multiple timescales. We developed a model to describe the activation of postsynaptic M1 receptors that leads to IP3 production from membrane PIP2 molecules. The binding of IP3 to IP3 receptors in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) ultimately causes calcium release. This calcium release from the ER activates potassium channels like the calcium-activated SK channels and alters different aspects of synaptic signaling. In an independent signaling cascade, M1 receptors also directly suppress SK channels and the voltage-activated KCNQ2/3 channels, enhancing post-synaptic excitability. In the CA3 presynaptic terminal, we model the reduction of the voltage sensitivity of voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs) and the resulting suppression of neurotransmitter release by the action of the M4 receptors. Our results show that the reduced initial release probability because of acetylcholine alters short-term plasticity (STP) dynamics. We characterize the dichotomy of suppressing neurotransmitter release from CA3 neurons and the enhanced excitability of the postsynaptic CA1 spine. Mechanisms underlying STP operate over a few seconds, while those responsible for LTP last for hours, and both forms of plasticity have been linked with very distinct functions in the brain. We show that the concurrent suppression of neurotransmitter release and increased sensitivity conserves neurotransmitter vesicles and enhances the reliability in plasticity. Our work establishes a relationship between STP and LTP coordinated by neuromodulation with acetylcholine.
New tools for monitoring & manipulating cellular function
Dr. Looger will discuss reagents for tracking Ca2+, membrane potential ("voltage"), glutamate, GABA, acetylcholine, serotonin, dopamine, etc. He will also cover optogenetics tools and methods for correlative light/electron microscopy. They make all tools freely available to everyone and work to get them in the hands of people that have limited resources.
State-dependent regulation of cortical circuits
Spontaneous and sensory-evoked cortical activity is highly state-dependent, promoting the functional flexibility of cortical circuits underlying perception and cognition. Using neural recordings in combination with behavioral state monitoring, we find that arousal and motor activity have complementary roles in regulating local cortical operations, providing dynamic control of sensory encoding. These changes in encoding are linked to altered performance on perceptual tasks. Neuromodulators, such as acetylcholine, may regulate this state-dependent flexibility of cortical network function. We therefore recently developed an approach for dual mesoscopic imaging of acetylcholine release and neural activity across the entire cortical mantle in behaving mice. We find spatiotemporally heterogeneous patterns of cholinergic signaling across the cortex. Transitions between distinct behavioral states reorganize the structure of large-scale cortico-cortical networks and differentially regulate the relationship between cholinergic signals and neural activity. Together, our findings suggest dynamic state-dependent regulation of cortical network operations at the levels of both local and large-scale circuits.
Circuit mechanisms underlying the dynamic control of cortical processing by subcortical neuromodulators
Behavioral states such as arousal and attention can have profound effects on sensory processing, determining how – sometimes whether – a stimulus is processed. This state-dependence is believed to arise, at least in part, as a result of inputs to cortex from subcortical structures that release neuromodulators such as acetylcholine, noradrenaline, and serotonin, often non-synaptically. The mechanisms that underlie the interaction between these “wireless” non-synaptic signals and the “wired” cortical circuit are not well understood. Furthermore, neuromodulatory signaling is traditionally considered broad in its impact across cortex (within a species) and consistent in its form and function across species (at least in mammals). The work I will present approaches the challenge of understanding neuromodulatory action in the cortex from a number of angles: anatomy, physiology, pharmacology, and chemistry. The overarching goal of our effort is to elucidate the mechanisms behind local neuromodulation in the cortex of non-human primates, and to reveal differences in structure and function across cortical model systems.
The subcellular organization of excitation and inhibition underlying high-fidelity direction coding in the retina
Understanding how neural circuits in the brain compute information not only requires determining how individual inhibitory and excitatory elements of circuits are wired together, but also a detailed knowledge of their functional interactions. Recent advances in optogenetic techniques and mouse genetics now offer ways to specifically probe the functional properties of neural circuits with unprecedented specificity. Perhaps one of the most heavily interrogated circuits in the mouse brain is one in the retina that is involved in coding direction (reviewed by Mauss et al., 2017; Vaney et al., 2012). In this circuit, direction is encoded by specialized direction-selective (DS) ganglion cells (DSGCs), which respond robustly to objects moving in a ‘preferred’ direction but not in the opposite or ‘null’ direction (Barlow and Levick, 1965). We now know this computation relies on the coordination of three transmitter systems: glutamate, GABA and acetylcholine (ACh). In this talk, I will discuss the synaptic mechanisms that produce the spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition and excitation that are crucial for shaping directional selectivity. Special emphasis will be placed on the role of ACh, as it is unclear whether it is mediated by synaptic or non-synaptic mechanisms, which is in fact a central issue in the CNS. Barlow, H.B., and Levick, W.R. (1965). The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J Physiol 178, 477-504. Mauss, A.S., Vlasits, A., Borst, A., and Feller, M. (2017). Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity. Annu Rev Neurosci 40, 211-230. Vaney, D.I., Sivyer, B., and Taylor, W.R. (2012). Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 194-208