Gut/Body interactions in health and disease
The adult intestine is a major barrier epithelium and coordinator of multi-organ functions. Stem cells constantly repair the intestinal epithelium by adjusting their proliferation and differentiation to tissue intrinsic as well as micro- and macro-environmental signals. How these signals integrate to control intestinal and whole-body homeostasis is largely unknown. Addressing this gap in knowledge is central to an improved understanding of intestinal pathophysiology and its systemic consequences. Combining Drosophila and mammalian model systems my laboratory has discovered fundamental mechanisms driving intestinal regeneration and tumourigenesis and outlined complex inter-organ signaling regulating health and disease. During my talk, I will discuss inter-related areas of research from my lab, including:1- Interactions between the intestine and its microenvironment influencing intestinal regeneration and tumourigenesis. 2- Long-range signals from the intestine impacting whole-body in health and disease.
Feedback control in the nervous system: from cells and circuits to behaviour
The nervous system is fundamentally a closed loop control device: the output of actions continually influences the internal state and subsequent actions. This is true at the single cell and even the molecular level, where “actions” take the form of signals that are fed back to achieve a variety of functions, including homeostasis, excitability and various kinds of multistability that allow switching and storage of memory. It is also true at the behavioural level, where an animal’s motor actions directly influence sensory input on short timescales, and higher level information about goals and intended actions are continually updated on the basis of current and past actions. Studying the brain in a closed loop setting requires a multidisciplinary approach, leveraging engineering and theory as well as advances in measuring and manipulating the nervous system. I will describe our recent attempts to achieve this fusion of approaches at multiple levels in the nervous system, from synaptic signalling to closed loop brain machine interfaces.
Quasicriticality and the quest for a framework of neuronal dynamics
Critical phenomena abound in nature, from forest fires and earthquakes to avalanches in sand and neuronal activity. Since the 2003 publication by Beggs & Plenz on neuronal avalanches, a growing body of work suggests that the brain homeostatically regulates itself to operate near a critical point where information processing is optimal. At this critical point, incoming activity is neither amplified (supercritical) nor damped (subcritical), but approximately preserved as it passes through neural networks. Departures from the critical point have been associated with conditions of poor neurological health like epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. One complication that arises from this picture is that the critical point assumes no external input. But, biological neural networks are constantly bombarded by external input. How is then the brain able to homeostatically adapt near the critical point? We’ll see that the theory of quasicriticality, an organizing principle for brain dynamics, can account for this paradoxical situation. As external stimuli drive the cortex, quasicriticality predicts a departure from criticality while maintaining optimal properties for information transmission. We’ll see that simulations and experimental data confirm these predictions and describe new ones that could be tested soon. More importantly, we will see how this organizing principle could help in the search for biomarkers that could soon be tested in clinical studies.
Trading Off Performance and Energy in Spiking Networks
Many engineered and biological systems must trade off performance and energy use, and the brain is no exception. While there are theories on how activity levels are controlled in biological networks through feedback control (homeostasis), it is not clear what the effects on population coding are, and therefore how performance and energy can be traded off. In this talk we will consider this tradeoff in auto-encoding networks, in which there is a clear definition of performance (the coding loss). We first show how SNNs follow a characteristic trade-off curve between activity levels and coding loss, but that standard networks need to be retrained to achieve different tradeoff points. We next formalize this tradeoff with a joint loss function incorporating coding loss (performance) and activity loss (energy use). From this loss we derive a class of spiking networks which coordinates its spiking to minimize both the activity and coding losses -- and as a result can dynamically adjust its coding precision and energy use. The network utilizes several known activity control mechanisms for this --- threshold adaptation and feedback inhibition --- and elucidates their potential function within neural circuits. Using geometric intuition, we demonstrate how these mechanisms regulate coding precision, and thereby performance. Lastly, we consider how these insights could be transferred to trained SNNs. Overall, this work addresses a key energy-coding trade-off which is often overlooked in network studies, expands on our understanding of homeostasis in biological SNNs, as well as provides a clear framework for considering performance and energy use in artificial SNNs.
Estimation of current and future physiological states in insular cortex
Interoception, the sense of internal bodily signals, is essential for physiological homeostasis, cognition, and emotions. While human insular cortex (InsCtx) is implicated in interoception, the cellular and circuit mechanisms remain unclear. I will describe our recent work imaging mouse InsCtx neurons during two physiological deficiency states – hunger and thirst. InsCtx ongoing activity patterns reliably tracked the gradual return to homeostasis, but not changes in behavior. Accordingly, while artificial induction of hunger/thirst in sated mice via activation of specific hypothalamic neurons (AgRP/SFOGLUT) restored cue-evoked food/water-seeking, InsCtx ongoing activity continued to reflect physiological satiety. During natural hunger/thirst, food/water cues rapidly and transiently shifted InsCtx population activity to the future satiety-related pattern. During artificial hunger/thirst, food/water cues further shifted activity beyond the current satiety-related pattern. Together with circuit-mapping experiments, these findings suggest that InsCtx integrates visceral-sensory inputs regarding current physiological state with hypothalamus-gated amygdala inputs signaling upcoming ingestion of food/water, to compute a prediction of future physiological state.
Combining two mechanisms to produce neural firing rate homeostasis
The typical goal of homeostatic mechanisms is to ensure a system operates at or in the vicinity of a stable set point, where a particular measure is relatively constant and stable. Neural firing rate homeostasis is unusual in that a set point of fixed firing rate is at odds with the goal of a neuron to convey information, or produce timed motor responses, which require temporal variations in firing rate. Therefore, for a neuron, a range of firing rates is required for optimal function, which could, for example, be set by a dual system that controls both mean and variance of firing rate. We explore, both via simulations and analysis, how two experimentally measured mechanisms for firing rate homeostasis can cooperate to improve information processing and avoid the pitfall of pulling in different directions when their set points do not appear to match.
Circuit homeostasis: keeping a level head when the brain gets hot
Core body temperature is regulated to a setpoint between 36.1 to 37.8°C, with an average fluctuation of 0.5°C during a 24-hour day. Despite mechanistic safeguards, major temperature deviations (1-3°C) from the setpoint occur in the body and in turn the brain. For unknown reasons, in most mammals (humans included), these increases in brain temperature are benign. However, macro-fluctuations in brain temperature in some cases result in deleterious outcomes such as seizures. In this talk, I will describe a mechanism for circuit-level adaptive regulation of cortical activity during macro-fluctuations in brain temperature. I will also discuss how this mechanism can be applied towards the understanding of the pathology of Autism Spectrum Disorder.
Anatomical decision-making by cellular collectives: bioelectrical pattern memories, regeneration, and synthetic living organisms
A key question for basic biology and regenerative medicine concerns the way in which evolution exploits physics toward adaptive form and function. While genomes specify the molecular hardware of cells, what algorithms enable cellular collectives to reliably build specific, complex, target morphologies? Our lab studies the way in which all cells, not just neurons, communicate as electrical networks that enable scaling of single-cell properties into collective intelligences that solve problems in anatomical feature space. By learning to read, interpret, and write bioelectrical information in vivo, we have identified some novel controls of growth and form that enable incredible plasticity and robustness in anatomical homeostasis. In this talk, I will describe the fundamental knowledge gaps with respect to anatomical plasticity and pattern control beyond emergence, and discuss our efforts to understand large-scale morphological control circuits. I will show examples in embryogenesis, regeneration, cancer, and synthetic living machines. I will also discuss the implications of this work for not only regenerative medicine, but also for fundamental understanding of the origin of bodyplans and the relationship between genomes and functional anatomy.
Neural circuit parameter variability, robustness, and homeostasis
Neurons and neural circuits can produce stereotyped and reliable output activity on the basis of highly variable cellular, synaptic, and circuit properties. This is crucial for proper nervous system function throughout an animal’s life in the face of growth, perturbations, and molecular turnover. But how can reliable output arise from neurons and synapses whose parameter vary between individuals in a population, and within an individual over time? I will review how a combination of experimental and computational methods can be used to examine how neuron and network function depends on the underlying parameters, such as neuronal membrane conductances and synaptic strengths. Within the high-dimensional parameter space of a neural system, the subset of parameter combinations that produce biologically functional neuron or circuit activity is captured by the notion of a ‘solution space’. I will describe solution space structures determined from electrophysiology data, ion channel expression levels across populations of neurons and animals, and computational parameter space explorations. A key finding centers on experimental and computational evidence for parameter correlations that give structure to solution spaces. Computational modeling suggests that such parameter correlations can be beneficial for constraining neuron and circuit properties to functional regimes, while experimental results indicate that neural circuits may have evolved to implement some of these beneficial parameter correlations at the cellular level. Finally, I will review modeling work and experiments that seek to illuminate how neural systems can homeostatically navigate their parameter spaces to stably remain within their solution space and reliably produce functional output, or to return to their solution space after perturbations that temporarily disrupt proper neuron or network function.
Firing Homeostasis in Neural Circuits: From Basic Principles to Malfunctions
Neural circuit functions are stabilized by homeostatic mechanisms at long timescales in response to changes in experience and learning. However, we still do not know which specific physiological variables are being stabilized, nor which cellular or neural-network components comprise the homeostatic machinery. At this point, most evidence suggests that the distribution of firing rates amongst neurons in a brain circuit is the key variable that is maintained around a circuit-specific set-point value in a process called firing rate homeostasis. Here, I will discuss our recent findings that implicate mitochondria as a central player in mediating firing rate homeostasis and its impairments. While mitochondria are known to regulate neuronal variables such as synaptic vesicle release or intracellular calcium concentration, we searched for the mitochondrial signaling pathways that are essential for homeostatic regulation of firing rates. We utilize basic concepts of control theory to build a framework for classifying possible components of the homeostatic machinery in neural networks. This framework may facilitate the identification of new homeostatic pathways whose malfunctions drive instability of neural circuits in distinct brain disorders.
Collective Ecophysiology and Physics of Social Insects
Collective behavior of organisms creates environmental micro-niches that buffer them from environmental fluctuations e.g., temperature, humidity, mechanical perturbations, etc., thus coupling organismal physiology, environmental physics, and population ecology. This talk will focus on a combination of biological experiments, theory, and computation to understand how a collective of bees can integrate physical and behavioral cues to attain a non-equilibrium steady state that allows them to resist and respond to environmental fluctuations of forces and flows. We analyze how bee clusters change their shape and connectivity and gain stability by spread-eagling themselves in response to mechanical perturbations. Similarly, we study how bees in a colony respond to environmental thermal perturbations by deploying a fanning strategy at the entrance that they use to create a forced ventilation stream that allows the bees to collectively maintain a constant hive temperature. When combined with quantitative analysis and computations in both systems, we integrate the sensing of the environmental cues (acceleration, temperature, flow) and convert them to behavioral outputs that allow the swarms to achieve a dynamic homeostasis.
Differential Resilience of Neurons and Networks with Similar Behavior to Perturbation
Both computational and experimental results in single neurons and small networks demonstrate that very similar network function can result from quite disparate sets of neuronal and network parameters. Using the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system, we study the influence of these differences in underlying structure on differential resilience of individuals to a variety of environmental perturbations, including changes in temperature, pH, potassium concentration and neuromodulation. We show that neurons with many different kinds of ion channels can smoothly move through different mechanisms in generating their activity patterns, thus extending their dynamic range.
A New Approach to the Hard Problem of Consciousness
David Chalmers’s (1995) hard problem famously states: “It is widely agreed that experience arises from a physical basis, but we have no good explanation of why and how it so arises.” Thomas Nagel (1974) wrote something similar: “If we acknowledge that a physical theory of mind must account for the subjective character of experience, we must admit that no presently available conception gives us a clue about how this could be done.” This presentation will point the way towards the long-sought “good explanation” -- or at least it will provide “a clue”. I will make three points: (1) It is unfortunate that cognitive science took vision as its model example when looking for a ‘neural correlate of consciousness’ because cortical vision (like most cognitive processes) is not intrinsically conscious. There is not necessarily ‘something it is like’ to see. (2) Affective feeling, by contrast, is conscious by definition. You cannot feel something without feeling it. Moreover, affective feeling, generated in the upper brainstem, is the foundational form of consciousness: prerequisite for all the higher cognitive forms. (3) The functional mechanism of feeling explains why and how it cannot go on ‘in the dark’, free of any inner feel. Affect enables the organism to monitor deviations from its expected self-states in uncertain situations and thereby frees homeostasis from the limitations of automatism. As Nagel says, “An organism has conscious mental states if and only if there is something that it is like to be that organism—something it is like for the organism.” Affect literally constitutes the sentient subject.