Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Topic: Hyperalignment

Seminar
2 seminars
ePoster
1 ePoster

In Brain Imaging and Computational Neuroscience

Seminar · Neuroscience

Modeling shared and variable information encoded in fine-scale cortical topographies

James Haxby · Dartmouth College

Tue, Dec 13, 2022 · 16:00 UTC

Information is encoded in fine-scale functional topographies that vary from brain to brain. Hyperalignment models information that is shared across brain in a high-dimensional common information space. Hyperalignment transformations project idiosyncratic individual topographies into the common model information space. These transformations contain topographic basis functions, affording estimates of how shared information in the common model space is instantiated in the idiosyncratic functional topographies of individual brains. This new model of the functional organization of cortex – as m

Seminar · Computational Neuroscience

Hyperalignment: Modeling shared information encoded in idiosyncratic cortical topographies

James Haxby · Dartmouth College

Fri, Jun 26, 2020 · 14:30 UTC

Information that is shared across brains is encoded in idiosyncratic fine-scale functional topographies. Hyperalignment jointly models shared information and idiosyncratic topographies. Pattern vectors for neural responses and connectivities are projected into a common, high-dimensional information space, rather than being aligned in a canonical anatomical space. Hyperalignment calculates individual transformation matrices that preserve the geometry of pairwise dissimilarities between pattern vectors. Individual cortical topographies are modeled as mixtures of overlapping, individual-specific

ePoster · Signal Processing

Functional inter-subject alignment of MEG data outperforms anatomical alignment

Leo Michalke, Jochem Rieger · Bernstein Conference 2024

Neuroscientific studies often involve some form of group analysis over multiple participants. This requires alignment of recordings across participants. A naïve and commonly used solution is to assume that participants' recordings can be aligned anatomically in sensor space. However, this assumption is likely violated due to functional-anatomical organization differences between individual brains. In this work, multiple methods were compared to find a common representation of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) activations recorded from different participants performing a grasping task with three d