Topic: layer 2/3

Stringer et al. used two-photon calcium imaging to record activity from tens of thousands of V1 cells in head-fixed mice during a visual orientation discrimination task, and showed that the neural response encodes stimulus discrimination thresholds nearly 100 times more precise than the corresponding behavioral thresholds. Animal arousal state was monitored by measuring the locomotion speed during task execution, but could not explain this large discrepancy in discrimination threshold. Here, we take advantage of the fact that the behavioral data was acquired in that experiment, and ask whethe

Predictive learning hypotheses posit that the neocortex learns a hierarchical model of the structure of features in the environment. Under these hypotheses, expected or predictable features are differentiated from unexpected ones by comparing bottom-up and top-down streams of data, with unexpected features then driving changes in the representation of incoming stimuli. This is supported by numerous studies in early sensory cortices showing that pyramidal neurons respond particularly strongly to unexpected stimulus events. However, it remains unknown how their responses govern subsequent change

Biological circuits adapt their behaviour through experience and ongoing learning in a non-trivial manner. Experimental evidence shows differing neuronal population responses to familiar and novel stimuli [1, 2], indicating that neural circuits operate in distinct processing modes depending on stimulus familiarity. In layer 2/3 of mouse primary visual cortex (V1) specifically, populations of pyramidal and vasoactive-intestinal-peptide-expressing (VIP) cells show pronounced responses to novel visual stimuli (novelty responses) and weaker responses to familiar ones. Although experimental and the