Extrinsic control and autonomous computation in the hippocampal CA1 circuit
In understanding circuit operations, a key issue is the extent to which neuronal spiking reflects local computation or responses to upstream inputs. Because pyramidal cells in CA1 do not have local recurrent projections, it is currently assumed that firing in CA1 is inherited from its inputs – thus, entorhinal inputs provide communication with the rest of the neocortex and the outside world, whereas CA3 inputs provide internal and past memory representations. Several studies have attempted to prove this hypothesis, by lesioning or silencing either area CA3 or the entorhinal cortex and examining the effect of firing on CA1 pyramidal cells. Despite the intense and careful work in this research area, the magnitudes and types of the reported physiological impairments vary widely across experiments. At least part of the existing variability and conflicts is due to the different behavioral paradigms, designs and evaluation methods used by different investigators. Simultaneous manipulations in the same animal or even separate manipulations of the different inputs to the hippocampal circuits in the same experiment are rare. To address these issues, I used optogenetic silencing of unilateral and bilateral mEC, of the local CA1 region, and performed bilateral pharmacogenetic silencing of the entire CA3 region. I combined this with high spatial resolution recording of local field potentials (LFP) in the CA1-dentate axis and simultaneously collected firing pattern data from thousands of single neurons. Each experimental animal had up to two of these manipulations being performed simultaneously. Silencing the medial entorhinal (mEC) largely abolished extracellular theta and gamma currents in CA1, without affecting firing rates. In contrast, CA3 and local CA1 silencing strongly decreased firing of CA1 neurons without affecting theta currents. Each perturbation reconfigured the CA1 spatial map. Yet, the ability of the CA1 circuit to support place field activity persisted, maintaining the same fraction of spatially tuned place fields, and reliable assembly expression as in the intact mouse. Thus, the CA1 network can maintain autonomous computation to support coordinated place cell assemblies without reliance on its inputs, yet these inputs can effectively reconfigure and assist in maintaining stability of the CA1 map.
Slow global population dynamics propagating through the medial entorhinal cortex
The medial entorhinal cortex (MEC) supports the brain’s representation of space with distinct cell types whose firing is tuned to features of the environment (grid, border, and object-vector cells) or navigation (head-direction and speed cells). While the firing properties of these functionally-distinct cell types are well characterized, how they interact with one another remains unknown. To determine how activity self-organizes in the MEC network, we tested mice in a spontaneous locomotion task under sensory-deprived conditions. Using 2-photon calcium imaging, we monitored the activity of large populations of MEC neurons in head-fixed mice running on a wheel in darkness, in the absence of external sensory feedback tuned to navigation. We unveiled the presence of motifs that involve the sequential activation of cells in layer II of MEC (MEC-L2). We call these motifs waves. Waves lasted tens of seconds to minutes, were robust, swept through the entire network of active cells and did not exhibit any anatomical organization. Furthermore, waves did not map the position of the mouse on the wheel and were not restricted to running epochs. The majority of MEC-L2 neurons participate in this global sequential dynamics, that ties all functional cell types together. We found the waves in the most lateral region of MEC, but not in adjacent areas such as PaS or in a sensory cortex such as V1.