Mechanisms Underlying the Persistence of Cancer-Related Fatigue
Cancer-related fatigue is a prominent and debilitating side effect of cancer and its treatment. It can develop prior to diagnosis, generally peaks during cancer treatment, and can persist long after treatment completion. Its mechanisms are multifactorial, and its expression is highly variable. Unfortunately, treatment options are limited. Our research uses syngeneic murine models of cancer and cisplatin-based chemotherapy to better understand these mechanisms. Our data indicate that both peripherally and centrally processes may contribute to the developmental of fatigue. These processes include metabolic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, pre-cachexia, and inflammation. However, our data has revealed that behavioral fatigue can persist even after the toxicity associated with cancer and its treatment recover. For example, running during cancer treatment attenuates kidney toxicity while also delaying recovery from fatigue-like behavior. Additionally, administration of anesthetics known to disrupt memory consolidation at the time treatment can promote recovery, and treatment-related cues can re-instate fatigue after recovery. Cancer-related fatigue can also promote habitual behavioral patterns, as observed using a devaluation task. We interpret this data to suggest that limit metabolic resources during cancer promote the utilization of habit-based behavioral strategies that serve to maintain fatigue behavior into survivorship. This line of work is exciting as it points us toward novel interventional targets for the treatment of persistent cancer-related fatigue.
Understanding and treating epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and focal cortical dysplasia type II (FCDII) are caused by mutations in mTOR pathway genes leading to mTOR hyperactivity, focal malformations of cortical development (fMCD), and seizures in 80-90% of the patients. The current definitive treatments for epilepsy are surgical resection or treatment with everolimus, which inhibits mTOR activity (only approved for TSC). Because both options have severe limitations, there is a major need to better understand the mechanisms leading to seizures to improve life-long epilepsy treatment in TSC and FCDII. To investigate such mechanisms, we recently developed a murine model of fMCD-associated epilepsy that recapitulates the human TSC and FCDII disorders. fMCD are defined by the presence of misplaced, dysmorphic cortical neurons expressing hyperactive mTOR – for simplicity we will refer to these as “mutant” neurons. In our model and in human TSC tissue, we made a surprising finding that mutant neurons express HCN4 channels, which are not normally functionally expressed in cortical neurons, and increased levels of filamin A (FLNA). FLNA is an actin-crossing linking molecule that has also multiple binding partners inside cells. These data led us to ask several important questions: (1) As HCN4 channels are responsible for the pacemaking activity of the heart, can HCN4 channel expression lead to repetitive firing of mutant neurons resulting in seizures? (2) HCN4 is the most cAMP-sensitive of the four HCN isoforms. Does increase in cAMP lead to the firing of mutant neurons? (3) Does increase in FLNA contribute to neuronal alterations and seizures? (4) Is the abnormal HCN4 and FLNA expression in mutant neurons due to mTOR? These questions will be discussed and addressed in the lecture.