Topic: reproducibility

Autonomous laboratories must connect software to physical instruments while retaining meaningful scientific input from researchers. This interdisciplinary workshop examines how humans and automated systems can share experimental tasks, with particular attention to fragmented instrument interfaces, sample handling and integration failures. Participants compare robotic orchestration, interoperability, human–robot interaction and reproducibility in physically executed experiments. Examples span microscopy, thin-film polymers, nanoparticle synthesis, antimicrobial discovery, batteries and fuels. T

Irene Rombel discusses how artificial intelligence and machine learning can address bottlenecks, quality issues, and production costs in cell, gene, and RNA therapy manufacturing. The seminar focuses on real-world process-development applications that improve reproducibility, speed, and cost effectiveness.

Hans Ekkehard Plesser discusses reproducibility in computational research through a decade of work with the Potjans-Diesmann cortical network model.

Research articles and laboratory protocol organization often lack detailed instructions for replicating experiments. protocols.io is an open-access platform where researchers collaboratively create dynamic, interactive, step-by-step protocols that can be executed on mobile devices or the web. Researchers can easily and efficiently share protocols with colleagues, collaborators, the scientific community, or make them public. Real-time communication and interaction keep protocols up to date. Public protocols receive a DOI and enable open communication with authors and researchers to foster effic

Research articles and laboratory protocol organization often lack detailed instructions for replicating experiments. protocols.io is an open-access platform where researchers collaboratively create dynamic, interactive, step-by-step protocols that can be executed on mobile devices or the web. Researchers can easily and efficiently share protocols with colleagues, collaborators, the scientific community, or make them public. Real-time communication and interaction keep protocols up to date. Public protocols receive a DOI and enable open communication with authors and researchers to foster effic

In this talk, I will discuss the OpenNeuro Fitlins GLM package and provide an illustration of the analytic workflow. OpenNeuro FitLins GLM is a semi-automated pipeline that reduces barriers to analyzing task-based fMRI data from OpenNeuro's 600+ task datasets. Created for psychology, psychiatry and cognitive neuroscience researchers without extensive computational expertise, this tool automates what is largely a manual process and compilation of in-house scripts for data retrieval, validation, quality control, statistical modeling and reporting that, in some cases, may require weeks of effort.

We will discuss a recent paper by Taylor et al. (2023): https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811923002896. They discuss the merits of highlighting results instead of hiding them; that is, clearly marking which voxels and clusters pass a given significance threshold, but still highlighting sub-threshold results, with opacity proportional to the strength of the effect. They use this to illustrate how there in fact may be more agreement between researchers than previously thought, using the NARPS dataset as an example. By adopting a continuous, "highlighted" approach, it become

It is now widely accepted that openness and transparency are keys to improving the reproducibility of scientific research, but many challenges remain to adoption of these practices. I will discuss the growth of an ecosystem for open science within the field of neuroimaging, focusing on platforms for open data sharing and open source tools for reproducible data analysis. I will also discuss the role of the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS), a community standard for data organization, in enabling this open science ecosystem, and will outline the scientific impacts of these resources.

In systems neuroscience, datasets are multimodal and include data-streams of various origins: multichannel electrophysiology, 1- or 2-p calcium imaging, behavior, etc. Often, the exact nature of data streams are unique to each lab, if not each project. Analyzing these datasets in an efficient and open way is crucial for collaboration and reproducibility. In this combined webinar and tutorial, Adrien Peyrache and Guillaume Viejo will present Pynapple, a Python-based data analysis pipeline for systems neuroscience. Designed for flexibility and versatility, Pynapple allows users to perform cross-

In systems neuroscience, datasets are multimodal and include data-streams of various origins: multichannel electrophysiology, 1- or 2-p calcium imaging, behavior, etc. Often, the exact nature of data streams are unique to each lab, if not each project. Analyzing these datasets in an efficient and open way is crucial for collaboration and reproducibility. In this combined webinar and tutorial, Adrien Peyrache and Guillaume Viejo will present Pynapple, a Python-based data analysis pipeline for systems neuroscience. Designed for flexibility and versatility, Pynapple allows users to perform cross-

There is a growing body of evidence that reproducibility or replication is low in neuroscience and in neuroimaging in particular, but the factors affecting studies solidity are still generally poorly understood, and the solutions are not clearly exposed to the neuroimaging scientific community. In this talk, I will review the key factors contributing to irreproducible results in neuroimaging specifically in the context of explanatory or prediction studies and propose a series of practical steps to improve the neuroimaging (and neuroscience) results robustness and re-usability.

This virtual, interactive panel on reproducibility in neuroscience will focus on practical advice that researchers at all career stages could implement to improve the reproducibility of their work, from power analyses and pre-registering reports to selecting statistical tests and data sharing. The event will comprise introductions of our speakers and how they came to be advocates for reproducibility in science, followed by a 25-minute discussion on reproducibility, including practical advice for researchers on how to improve their data collection, analysis, and reporting, and then 25 minutes o