Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Super-Recognizers

4 seminars

Newest first

…(DDP) in two unique observer groups: Super-Recognizers (SRs) and "normal" officers from within the 18K members of the Berlin Police. SRs were identified either via previously proposed lab-based procedures (Ramon, 2021) or the only existing tool for SR identification involving increasingly challenging, authentic forensic material: beSure® (Berlin Test For Super-Recognizer Identification; Ramon & Rjosk, 2022). Across two experiments we examined deepfake detection perfo

Tue, Feb 13, 2024 · 16:00 UTC

Cognition

Algorithmic advances in face matching: Stability of tests in atypical groups

Mirta Stantic · Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford

Face matching tests have traditionally been developed to assess human face perception in the neurotypical range, but methods that underlie their development often make it difficult for these measures to be applied in atypical populations (developmental prosopagnosics, super recognizers) due to unadjusted difficulty. We have recently presented the development of the Oxford Face Matching Test, a measure that bases individual item-difficulty on algorithmically derived similarity of presented stimuli. The measure seems useful as it can be given online or in-laboratory, has good discriminability an

Thu, Feb 18, 2021 · 16:00 UTC

Cognition

Super-Recognizers: facts, fallacies, and the future

Meike Ramon · University of Fribourg

…with superior skills, so-called Super-Recognizers (SRs; Ramon et al., 2019; Russell et al., 2009). Their study can provide valuable insights into brain-behavior relationships and advance our understanding of neural functioning. Despite a decade of research, and similarly to the field of developmental prosopagnosia, a consensus on diagnostic criteria for SR identification is lacking. Consequently, SRs are currently identified either inconsistently

Tue, Aug 4, 2020 · 13:00 UTC

Cognition