Computer Engineering seminars
September 2026
What Can Hardware Do for Computer Security?
Srini Devadas· Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Thu, Sep 24 · 23:00 UTC · Cambridge, Cambridge · Hybrid
Srini Devadas examines how hardware and cryptography can strengthen each other. Hardware can protect keys, monitor attacks in real time and reduce the trusted computing base, while hardware vulnerabilities can undermine software security. The talk presents research on accelerating cryptographic computation and using those capabilities to design more efficient protocols. It also asks how cryptography and new security definitions can guide the construction of secure hardware. Devadas is MIT's Webster Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. Hybrid: MIT Stata Center, Room 32-G449 (Kiva), 32 Vassar Street, Cambridge, MA 02139; online via Zoom. Thursday 24 September 2026, talk at 19:00 EDT (UTC−4); in-person refreshments begin at 18:30. This public event is organized by the Boston Chapter of the IEEE Computer Society and GBC/ACM. Register through the organizer-linked Zoom form for either mode and indicate online or in-person attendance. For physical access, use the Stata Center entrance nearest Main Street, then the fourth-floor elevators.
December 2025
Over the past decade our community has made substantial progress in the construction of anatomically detailed network models of the cortical tissue. Thanks to advances in computer hardware and simulation technology, researchers can now routinely work with these models at the natural density of neurons and synapses. Moreover, the availability of cloud services means that such investigations can be carried out without having to install either the model or the simulation software. A recent workshop analyzed the impact of a specific model of the cortical microcircuit, published ten years ago . The model has been reused in multiple contexts: for reproduction studies, validation of mean-field approaches, exploration of methods of model sharing, and as a building block for larger models. Although the model was less successful in inspiring further neuroscientific studies than the authors of the original work had hoped, it became a de facto benchmark for neuromorphic computing systems. It sparked a constructive race for ever shorter simulation times and lower energy consumption. The quantitative comparison of different platforms reveals qualitative differences between conventional and neuromorphic hardware and limits of speed-up. The structure of the model is based on light microscopy because these were the data available at the time. Guided by simulation results and physiological evidence, the original publication hypothesized a preference of excitatory neurons for inhibitory targets. Modern electron microscopy data of cortical volumes combined with AI based reconstruction techniques is capable of resolving individual synaptic connections. This advances the concept of digital twins of the cortical network to a new level of precision, and has already enabled us to confirm the assumption of target type specifity underlying earlier models. Maybe with the progress sketched here, our community is at a transition point where it becomes easier to cooperatively and incrementally work on models with a larger explanatory scope. Presented in the van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar series (formerly WWTNS) on 2025-12-10. Recording duration: 00:39:15.
Video · 39 minComputational NeuroscienceNeuroscienceSeries: van Vreeswijk Theoretical Neuroscience Seminar
June 2024
Open source FPGA tools for building research devices
Edmund Humenberger· CEO @ Symbiotic EDA
Tue, Jun 25 · 04:00 UTC · Online
Edmund will present why to use FPGAs when building scientific instruments, when and why to use open source FPGA tools, the history of their development, their development status, currently supported FPGA families and functions, current developments in design languages and tools, the community, freely available design blocks, and possible future developments.
November 2022
Merging insights from artificial and biological neural networks for neuromorphic intelligence
Charlotte Frenkel· TU Delft
Recorded
Algorithm-Hardware Co-design for Efficient and Robust Spiking Neural Networks
Priya Panda· Yale
Recorded
September 2020
Fast and deep neuromorphic learning with time-to-first-spike coding
Julian Goeltz· Universität Bern
Recorded
Engineered pattern-recognition systems strive for short time-to-solution and low energy-to-solution characteristics. This represents one of the main driving forces behind the development of neuromorphic devices. For both them and their biological archetypes, this corresponds to using as few spikes as early as possible. The concept of few and early spikes is used as the founding principle in the time-to-first-spike coding scheme. Within this framework, we have developed a spike-timing-based learning algorithm, which we used to train neuronal networks on the mixed-signal neuromorphic platform BrainScaleS-2. We derive, from first principles, error-backpropagation-based learning in networks of leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neurons relying only on spike times, for specific configurations of neuronal and synaptic time constants. We explicitly examine applicability to neuromorphic substrates by studying the effects of reduced weight precision and range, as well as of parameter noise. We demonstrate the feasibility of our approach on continuous and discrete data spaces, both in software simulations and on BrainScaleS-2. This narrows the gap between previous models of first-spike-time learning and biological neuronal dynamics and paves the way for fast and energy-efficient neuromorphic applications.
End of results.