Skip to contentSkip to filters

We use cookies for analytics.

Flexible inter-areal computations through low-rank communication subspaces

Neuroscience ePoster by Joao Barbosa and Srdjan Ostojic

Part of COSYNE 2022 posters, Ecole Normale Superieure

Saturday

COSYNE 2022
Lisbon, Portugal
Related content

Abstract

Neural computations underlying complex behavior implicate multiple brain regions and large-scale, multi-site recordings from behaving animals are becoming increasingly common. Based on simultaneous recordings across the visual cortex (V1, V2, and V4), a recent hypothesis posits that brain regions communicate through low-dimensional subspaces [Semedo et al. (2019, 2021)]. In particular, it was found that these communication subspaces are not fully aligned with the internal variability of individual areas, with some information remaining in a private subspace and the rest being communicated through a shared subspace. Most theoretical works, however, focus on modeling individual regions, with multi-area interactions only starting to be explored [e.g. Perich & Rajan (2020)]. Due to the lack of theoretical frameworks, the dynamical mechanisms governing communication through subspaces and their implications for behaviorally meaningful computations are still unclear.

Here we present a mechanistic model of the communication subspace hypothesis based on low-rank recurrent neural networks [Mastrogiuseppe & Ostojic (2018)]. Concretely, we focus on a two-area network (representing A1 and PFC) that implements a context-dependent decision-making task, similar to experiments with rats [Rodgers & deWeese (2014)]. Considered in isolation, the A1 network represents incoming stimuli, while the PFC network generates a sustained representation of context. Task-solving computations emerge only when the two networks are connected through low-rank subspaces. Specifically, context information was shared through a PFC→A1 communication subspace and led to the computation of a context-dependent decision in A1 that was propagated through an orthogonal A1→PFC subspace. In contrast, stimuli information remained in a private subspace of A1, similar to what we found in single-unit recordings from rat's A1. Altogether, our model offers a mechanistic implementation of the communication subspace hypothesis, which provides a test-bed for statistical inference of multi-area interactions and derives specific predictions for analyses of multi-region recordings.

Topics