Aggression is an innate behavior across animal species. It is essential for competing for food, defending territory, securing mates, and protecting families and oneself. Since initiating an attack requires no explicit learning, the neural circuit underlying aggression is believed to be genetically and developmentally hardwired. Despite being innate, aggression is highly plastic. It is influenced by a wide variety of experiences, particularly winning and losing previous encounters. Numerous studies have shown that winning leads to an increased tendency to fight while losing leads to flight in future encounters. In the talk, I will present our recent findings regarding the neural mechanisms underlying the behavioral changes caused by winning.

Theories of consciousness are commonly grouped into "first-order" and "higher-order" families. As conventional wisdom has it, many more animals are likely to be conscious if a first-order theory is correct. But two recent developments have put pressure on the first/higher-order distinction. One is the argument (from Shea and Frith) that an effective global workspace mechanism must involve a form of metacognition. The second is Lau's "perceptual reality monitoring" (PRM) theory, a member of the "higher-order" family in which conscious sensory content is not re-represented, only tagged with a temporal index and marked as reliable. I argue that the first/higher-order distinction has become so blurred that it is no longer particularly useful. Moreover, the conventional wisdom about animals should not be trusted. It could be, for example, that the distribution of PRM in the animal kingdom is wider than the distribution of global broadcasting.

Behavior relies on the ability of sensory systems to infer changing properties of the environment from incoming sensory stimuli. However, the demands that detecting and adjusting to changes in the environment place on a sensory system often differ from the demands associated with performing a specific behavioral task. This necessitates neural coding strategies that can dynamically balance these conflicting needs. I will discuss our ongoing theoretical work to understand how this balance can best be achieved. We connect ideas from efficient coding and Bayesian inference to ask how sensory systems should dynamically allocate limited resources when the goal is to optimally infer changing latent states of the environment, rather than reconstruct incoming stimuli. We use these ideas to explore dynamic tradeoffs between the efficiency and speed of sensory adaptation schemes, and the downstream computations that these schemes might support. Finally, we derive families of codes that balance these competing objectives, and we demonstrate their close match to experimentally-observed neural dynamics during sensory adaptation. These results provide a unifying perspective on adaptive neural dynamics across a range of sensory systems, environments, and sensory tasks.

Behavior relies on the ability of sensory systems to infer changing properties of the environment from incoming sensory stimuli. However, the demands that detecting and adjusting to changes in the environment place on a sensory system often differ from the demands associated with performing a specific behavioral task. This necessitates neural coding strategies that can dynamically balance these conflicting needs. I will discuss our ongoing theoretical work to understand how this balance can best be achieved. We connect ideas from efficient coding and Bayesian inference to ask how sensory systems should dynamically allocate limited resources when the goal is to optimally infer changing latent states of the environment, rather than reconstruct incoming stimuli. We use these ideas to explore dynamic tradeoffs between the efficiency and speed of sensory adaptation schemes, and the downstream computations that these schemes might support. Finally, we derive families of codes that balance these competing objectives, and we demonstrate their close match to experimentally-observed neural dynamics during sensory adaptation. These results provide a unifying perspective on adaptive neural dynamics across a range of sensory systems, environments, and sensory tasks.

Recent advancements in anatomical and functional imaging emphasize the presence of whole-brain networks organized according to functional and connectivity gradients, but how such structure shapes activity propagation and memory processes still lacks asatisfactory model. We analyse the fine-grained spatiotemporal dynamics of spontaneous activity in the entire dorsal cortex. through simultaneous recordings of wide-field voltage sensitive dye transients (VS), cortical ECoG, and hippocampal LFP in anesthetized mice. Both VS and ECoG show cortical avalanches. When measuring avalanches from the VS signal, we find a major deviation of the size scaling from the power-law distribution predicted by the criticality hypothesis and well approximated by the results from the ECoG. Breaking from scale-invariance, avalanches can thus be grouped in two regimes. Small avalanches consists of a limited number of co-activation modes involving a sub-set of cortical networks (related to the Default Mode Network), while larger avalanches involve a substantial portion of the cortical surface and can be clustered into two families: one immediately preceded by Retrosplenial Cortex activation and mostly involving medial-posterior networks, the other initiated by Somatosensory Cortex and extending preferentially along the lateral-anterior region. Rather than only differing in terms of size, these two set of events appear to be associated with markedly different brain-wide dynamical states: they are accompaniedby a shift in the hippocampal LFP, from the ripple band (smaller) to the gamma band (larger avalanches), and correspond to opposite directionality in the cortex-to-hippocampus causal relationship. These results provide a concrete description of global cortical dynamics, and shows how cortex in its entirety is involved in bi-directional communication in the hippocampus even in sleep-like states.

Transformative advances in deep learning, such as deep reinforcement learning, usually rely on gradient-based learning methods such as backpropagation through time (BPTT) as a core learning algorithm. However, BPTT is not argued to be biologically plausible, since it requires to a propagate gradients backwards in time and across neurons. Here, we propose e-prop, a novel gradient-based learning method with local and online weight update rules for recurrent neural networks, and in particular recurrent spiking neural networks (RSNNs). As a result, e-prop has the potential to provide a substantial fraction of the power of deep learning to RSNNs. In this presentation, we will motivate e-prop from the perspective of recent insights in neuroscience and show how these have to be combined to form an algorithm for online gradient descent. The mathematical results will be supported by empirical evidence in supervised and reinforcement learning tasks. We will also discuss how limitations that are inherited from gradient-based learning methods, such as sample-efficiency, can be addressed by considering an evolution-like optimization that enhances learning on particular task families. The emerging learning architecture can be used to learn tasks by a single demonstration, hence enabling one-shot learning.

In this talk, Professor Hardy will discuss the different causes and predispositions of PD that exist in Africa, and the differences to European populations. He will go on to discuss the importance of highlighting these differences and the impact of this vital research to people living with PD in Africa, as well as their families and caregivers.