Latest

SeminarNeuroscience

Precision and Temporal Stability of Directionality Inferences from Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) Brain Network Models

Alexander Weigard
University of Michigan
Mar 30, 2021

The Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME) framework has emerged as a promising method for characterizing connections between brain regions in functional neuroimaging data. Two of the most appealing features of this framework are its ability to estimate the directionality of connections between network nodes and its ability to determine whether those connections apply to everyone in a sample (group-level) or just to one person (individual-level). However, there are outstanding questions about the validity and stability of these estimates, including: 1) how recovery of connection directionality is affected by features of data sets such as scan length and autoregressive effects, which may be strong in some imaging modalities (resting state fMRI, fNIRS) but weaker in others (task fMRI); and 2) whether inferences about directionality at the group and individual levels are stable across time. This talk will provide an overview of the GIMME framework and describe relevant results from a large-scale simulation study that assesses directionality recovery under various conditions and a separate project that investigates the temporal stability of GIMME’s inferences in the Human Connectome Project data set. Analyses from these projects demonstrate that estimates of directionality are most precise when autoregressive and cross-lagged relations in the data are relatively strong, and that inferences about the directionality of group-level connections, specifically, appear to be stable across time. Implications of these findings for the interpretation of directional connectivity estimates in different types of neuroimaging data will be discussed.

SeminarNeuroscienceRecording

It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see

Yaara Yeshurun
Tel Aviv University
Aug 5, 2020

People frequently interpret the same information differently, based on their prior beliefs and views. This may occur in everyday settings, as when two friends are watching the same movie, but also in more consequential circumstances, such as when people interpret the same news differently based on their political views. The role of subjective knowledge in altering how the brain processes narratives has been explored mainly in controlled settings. I will present two projects that examines neural mechanisms underlying narrative interpretation “in the wild” -- how responses differ between two groups of people who interpret the same narrative in two coherent, but opposing ways. In the first project we manipulated participant’s prior knowledge to make them interpret the narrative differently, and found that responses in high-order areas, including the default mode network, language areas and subsets of the mirror neuron system, tend to be similar among people who share the same interpretation, but different from people with an opposing interpretation. In contrast to the active manipulation of participants’ interpretation in the first study, in the second (ongoing) project we examine these processes in a more ecological setting. Taking advantage of people’s natural tendencies to interpret the world through their own (political) filters, we examine these mechanisms while measuring their brain response to political movie clips. These studies are intended to deepen our understanding of the differences in subjective construal processes, by mapping their underlying brain mechanisms.

ePosterNeuroscience

Can auditory self-related stimuli make changes in hemodynamic response in frontal cortex: A preliminary fNIRS study

Merve Alokten, Lutfu Hanoglu

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Changes in the amplitude of the task-evoked hemodynamic response during grip movements; simultaneous fNIRS and fMRI measurements

Satoshi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Kawaguchi, Daisuke Ishii, Yutaka Kohno

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Exploring analytical procedures and short channels in fNIRS research: Insights and implications

Yann Lemaire, Jérémie Ginzburg, Olivier Deguine, Pascal Barone, Anne Caclin

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Frontopolar cortex is associated with the development of the ability to select complex rules: An fNIRS study

Taeko Harada, Toshiki Iwabuchi, Chikako Nakayasu, Mikihiro Shimizu, Ryuji Nakahara, Kenji Tsuchiya, Atsushi Senju, Yoko Hoshi

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Maternal versus stranger’s touch at 10 months: An fNIRS study

Camila Fragoso Ribeiro, Isabella Germinhasi Francischelli, Lívia Branco Campos, Lilia Sofia Ferreira de Sousa Cardoso, Borja Blanco, Sarah Lloyd-Fox, Rogério de Oliveira, Sergio Luiz Novi Junior, Rickson Coelho Mesquita, Ana Alexandra Caldas Osório

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Motor imagery among aphantasics and controls: A preliminary fNIRS study

Robert Kwaśniak, Dariusz Zapała, Paweł Augustynowicz, Klaudia Drej, Magdalena Szubielska

FENS Forum 2024

ePosterNeuroscience

Towards fNIRS hyperfeedback: Evaluating short time intervals of interbrain synchrony

Kathrin Kostorz, Trinh Nguyen, Yafeng Pan, Filip Melinscak, David Steyrl, Yi Hu, Bettina Sorger, Stefanie Hoehl, Frank Scharnowski

FENS Forum 2024

fNIRS coverage

9 items

ePoster7
Seminar2
Domain spotlight

Explore how fNIRS research is advancing inside Neuro.

Visit domain