Critical phenomena abound in nature, from forest fires and earthquakes to avalanches in sand and neuronal activity. Since the 2003 publication by Beggs & Plenz on neuronal avalanches, a growing body of work suggests that the brain homeostatically regulates itself to operate near a critical point where information processing is optimal. At this critical point, incoming activity is neither amplified (supercritical) nor damped (subcritical), but approximately preserved as it passes through neural networks. Departures from the critical point have been associated with conditions of poor neurological health like epilepsy, Alzheimer's disease, and depression. One complication that arises from this picture is that the critical point assumes no external input. But, biological neural networks are constantly bombarded by external input. How is then the brain able to homeostatically adapt near the critical point? We’ll see that the theory of quasicriticality, an organizing principle for brain dynamics, can account for this paradoxical situation. As external stimuli drive the cortex, quasicriticality predicts a departure from criticality while maintaining optimal properties for information transmission. We’ll see that simulations and experimental data confirm these predictions and describe new ones that could be tested soon. More importantly, we will see how this organizing principle could help in the search for biomarkers that could soon be tested in clinical studies.

Computation in neural circuits relies on a common set of motifs, including divergence of common inputs to parallel pathways, convergence of multiple inputs to a single neuron, and nonlinearities that select some signals over others. Convergence and circuit nonlinearities, considered individually, can lead to a loss of information about the inputs. Past work has detailed how to optimize nonlinearities and circuit weights to maximize information, but we show that selective nonlinearities, acting together with divergent and convergent circuit structure, can improve information transmission over a purely linear circuit despite the suboptimality of these components individually. These nonlinearities recode the inputs in a manner that preserves the variance among converged inputs. Our results suggest that neural circuits may be doing better than expected without finely tuned weights.

Animals rely on an internal sense of body position and movement to effectively control motor behaviour. This sense of proprioception is mediated by diverse populations of internal mechanosensory neurons distributed throughout the body. My lab is trying to understand how proprioceptive stimuli are detected by sensory neurons, integrated and transformed in central circuits, and used to guide motor output. We approach these questions using genetic tools, in vivo two-photon imaging, and patch-clamp electrophysiology in Drosophila. We recently found that the axons of fly leg proprioceptors are organized into distinct functional projections that contain topographic representations of specific kinematic features: one group of axons encodes tibia position, another encodes movement direction, and a third encodes bidirectional movement and vibration frequency. Whole-cell recordings from downstream neurons reveal that position, movement, and directional information remain segregated in central circuits. These feedback signals then converge upon motor neurons that control leg muscles during walking. Overall, our findings reveal how a low-dimensional stimulus – the angle of a single leg joint – is encoded by a diverse population of mechanosensory neurons. Specific proprioceptive parameters are initially processed by parallel pathways, but are ultimately integrated to influence motor output. This architecture may help to maximize information transmission, processing speed, and robustness, which are critical for feedback control of the limbs during adaptive locomotion.