To understand neural computation and the dynamics in the brain, we usually focus on the connectivity among neurons. In contrast, the properties of single neurons are often thought to be negligible, at least as far as the activity of networks is concerned. In this talk, I will contradict this notion and demonstrate how the biophysics of action-potential generation can have a decisive impact on network behaviour. Our recent theoretical work shows that, among regularly firing neurons, the somewhat unattended homoclinic type (characterized by a spike onset via a saddle homoclinic orbit bifurcation) particularly stands out: First, spikes of this type foster specific network states - synchronization in inhibitory and splayed-out/frustrated states in excitatory networks. Second, homoclinic spikes can easily be induced by changes in a variety of physiological parameters (like temperature, extracellular potassium, or dendritic morphology). As a consequence, such parameter changes can even induce switches in network states, solely based on a modification of cellular voltage dynamics. I will provide first experimental evidence and discuss functional consequences of homoclinic spikes for the design of efficient pattern-generating motor circuits in insects as well as for mammalian pathologies like febrile seizures. Our analysis predicts an interesting role for homoclinic action potentials as an integral part of brain dynamics in both health and disease.

We all have a sense of time. Yet it is a particularly intangible sensation. So how is our “sense” of time represented in the brain? Functional neuroimaging studies have consistently identified a network of regions, including Supplementary Motor Area and basal ganglia, that are activated when participants make judgements about the duration of currently unfolding events. In parallel, left parietal cortex and cerebellum are activated when participants predict when future events are likely to occur. These structures are activated by temporal processing even when task goals are purely perceptual. So why should the perception of time be represented in regions of the brain that have more traditionally been implicated in motor function? One possibility is that we learn about time through action. In other words, action could provide the functional scaffolding for learning about time in childhood, explaining why it has come to be represented in motor circuits of the adult brain.

Topographic maps are a prominent feature of brain organization, reflecting local and large-scale representation of the sensory surface. ​​Traditionally, such representations in early visual areas are conceived as retinotopic maps preserving ego-centric retinal spatial location while ensuring that other features of visual input are uniformly represented for every location in space. I will discuss our recent findings of a striking departure from this simple mapping in the secondary visual area (V2) of the tree shrew that is best described as a sinusoidal transformation of the visual field. This sinusoidal topography is ideal for achieving uniform coverage in an elongated area like V2 as predicted by mathematical models designed for wiring minimization, and provides a novel explanation for stripe-like patterns of intra-cortical connections and functional response properties in V2. Our findings suggest that cortical circuits flexibly implement solutions to sensory surface representation, with dramatic consequences for large-scale cortical organization. Furthermore our work challenges the framework of relatively independent encoding of location and features in the visual system, showing instead location-dependent feature sensitivity produced by specialized processing of different features in different spatial locations. In the second part of the talk, I will propose that location-dependent feature sensitivity is a fundamental organizing principle of the visual system that achieves efficient representation of positional regularities in visual input, and reflects the evolutionary selection of sensory and motor circuits to optimally represent behaviorally relevant information. The relevant papers can be found here: V2 retinotopy (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Neuron, 2021) Location-dependent feature sensitivity (Sedigh-Sarvestani et al. Under Review, 2022)

Our work concerns the general problem of adaptive behaviour in response to predatory threats, and of the neural mechanisms underlying a choice between strategies. When faced with a threat, an animal must decide whether to freeze, reducing its chances of being noticed, or to flee to the safety of a refuge. Animals from fish to primates choose between these two alternatives when confronted by an attacking predator, a choice that largely depends on the context in which the threat occurs. Recent work has made strides identifying the pre-motor circuits, and their inputs, which control freezing behaviour in rodents, but how contextual information is integrated to guide this choice is still far from understood. The social environment is a potent contextual modulator of defensive behaviours of animals in a group. Indeed, anti-predation strategies are believed to be a major driving force for the evolution of sociality. We recently found that fruit flies in response to visual looming stimuli, simulating a large object on collision course, make rapid freeze/flee choices accompanied by lasting changes in the fly’s internal state, reflected in altered cardiac activity. In this talk, I will discuss our work on how flies process contextual cues, focusing on the social environment, to guide their behavioural response to a threat. We have identified a social safety cue, resumption of activity, and visual projection neurons involved in processing this cue. Given the knowledge regarding sensory detection of looming threats and descending neuron involved in the expression of freezing, we are now in a unique position to understand how information about a threat is integrated with cues from the social environment to guide the choice of whether to freeze.

To communicate effectively, two individuals must take turns to prevent overlap in their signals. How does the nervous system coordinate vocalizations between two individuals? Female and male plain-tailed wrens sing a duet in which they alternate syllable production so rapidly and precisely it sounds as if a single bird is singing. I will talk about experiments that examine the interaction between sensory cues and motor activity, using behavioral manipulations and neurophysiological recordings from pairs of awake, duetting wrens. I will show evidence that auditory cues link the brains of the wrens by modulating motor circuits.