mouse V1

Spike train structure of cortical transcriptomic populations in vivo

The cortex comprises many neuronal types, which can be distinguished by their transcriptomes: the sets of genes they express. Little is known about the in vivo activity of these cell types, particularly as regards the structure of their spike trains, which might provide clues to cortical circuit function. To address this question, we used Neuropixels electrodes to record layer 5 excitatory populations in mouse V1, then transcriptomically identified the recorded cell types. To do so, we performed a subsequent recording of the same cells using 2-photon (2p) calcium imaging, identifying neurons between the two recording modalities by fingerprinting their responses to a “zebra noise” stimulus and estimating the path of the electrode through the 2p stack with a probabilistic method. We then cut brain slices and performed in situ transcriptomics to localize ~300 genes using coppaFISH3d, a new open source method, and aligned the transcriptomic data to the 2p stack. Analysis of the data is ongoing, and suggests substantial differences in spike time coordination between ET and IT neurons, as well as between transcriptomic subtypes of both these excitatory types.

A transcriptomic axis predicts state modulation of cortical interneurons

Transcriptomics has revealed that cortical inhibitory neurons exhibit a great diversity of fine molecular subtypes, but it is not known whether these subtypes have correspondingly diverse activity patterns in the living brain. We show that inhibitory subtypes in primary visual cortex (V1) have diverse correlates with brain state, but that this diversity is organized by a single factor: position along their main axis of transcriptomic variation. We combined in vivo 2-photon calcium imaging of mouse V1 with a novel transcriptomic method to identify mRNAs for 72 selected genes in ex vivo slices. We classified inhibitory neurons imaged in layers 1-3 into a three-level hierarchy of 5 Subclasses, 11 Types, and 35 Subtypes using previously-defined transcriptomic clusters. Responses to visual stimuli differed significantly only across Subclasses, suppressing cells in the Sncg Subclass while driving cells in the other Subclasses. Modulation by brain state differed at all hierarchical levels but could be largely predicted from the first transcriptomic principal component, which also predicted correlations with simultaneously recorded cells. Inhibitory Subtypes that fired more in resting, oscillatory brain states have less axon in layer 1, narrower spikes, lower input resistance and weaker adaptation as determined in vitro and express more inhibitory cholinergic receptors. Subtypes firing more during arousal had the opposite properties. Thus, a simple principle may largely explain how diverse inhibitory V1 Subtypes shape state-dependent cortical processing.

Self-organisation in interneuron circuits

Inhibitory interneurons come in different classes and form intricate circuits. While our knowledge of these circuits has advanced substantially over the last decades, it is not fully understood how the structure of these circuits relates to their function. I will present some of our recent attempts to “understand” the structure of interneuron circuits by means of computational modeling. Surprisingly (at least for us), we found that prominent features of inhibitory circuitry can be accounted for by an optimisation for excitation-inhibition (E/I) balance. In particular, we find that such an optimisation generates networks that resemble mouse V1 in terms of the structure of synaptic efficacies between principal cells and parvalbumin-positive interneurons. Moreover, an optimisation for E/I balance across neuronal compartments promotes a functional diversification of interneurons into two classes that resemble parvalbumin and somatostatin-positive interneurons. Time permitting, I may briefly touch on recent work in which we link E/I balance to prediction error coding in V1.

Circuit-based framework for fine spatial scale clustering of orientation tuning in mouse V1

COSYNE 2023

Quantification of nonsense-free correlation uncovers the interaction between top-down and bottom-up sources of behavioral correlation in mouse V1

COSYNE 2025

Contextual representations of natural scenes in monkey and mouse V1 neurons

Representation of prey-related variables in mouse V1 during prey capture behavior

Optimizing ultraflexible electrodes microstimulation parameters for inducing localized neuronal activation in mouse V1

FENS Forum 2024

Locomotion speed is encoded in superficial layers of mouse V1 with a non-uniform distribution biased towards layer 4

Neuromatch 5