This webinar on learning and memory features three experts—Nicolas Brunel, Ashok Litwin-Kumar, and Julijana Gjorgieva—who present theoretical and computational approaches to understanding how neural circuits acquire and store information across different scales. Brunel discusses calcium-based plasticity and how standard “Hebbian-like” plasticity rules inferred from in vitro or in vivo datasets constrain synaptic dynamics, aligning with classical observations (e.g., STDP) and explaining how synaptic connectivity shapes memory. Litwin-Kumar explores insights from the fruit fly connectome, emphasizing how the mushroom body—a key site for associative learning—implements a high-dimensional, random representation of sensory features. Convergent dopaminergic inputs gate plasticity, reflecting a high-dimensional “critic” that refines behavior. Feedback loops within the mushroom body further reveal sophisticated interactions between learning signals and action selection. Gjorgieva examines how activity-dependent plasticity rules shape circuitry from the subcellular (e.g., synaptic clustering on dendrites) to the cortical network level. She demonstrates how spontaneous activity during development, Hebbian competition, and inhibitory-excitatory balance collectively establish connectivity motifs responsible for key computations such as response normalization.

Neurons in the brain communicate through action potentials (spikes) that are transmitted through chemical synapses. Throughout the last decades, the question how networks of spiking neurons represent and process information has remained an important challenge. Some progress has resulted from a recent family of supervised learning rules (tempotrons) for models of spiking neurons. However, these studies have viewed synaptic transmission as static and characterized synaptic efficacies as scalar quantities that change only on slow time scales of learning across trials but remain fixed on the fast time scales of information processing within a trial. By contrast, signal transduction at chemical synapses in the brain results from complex molecular interactions between multiple biochemical processes whose dynamics result in substantial short-term plasticity of most connections. Here we study the computational capabilities of spiking neurons whose synapses are dynamic and plastic, such that each individual synapse can learn its own dynamics. We derive tempotron learning rules for current-based leaky-integrate-and-fire neurons with different types of dynamic synapses. Introducing ordinal synapses whose efficacies depend only on the order of input spikes, we establish an upper capacity bound for spiking neurons with dynamic synapses. We compare this bound to independent synapses, static synapses and to the well established phenomenological Tsodyks-Markram model. We show that synaptic dynamics in principle allow the storage capacity of spiking neurons to scale with the number of input spikes and that this increase in capacity can be traded for greater robustness to input noise, such as spike time jitter. Our work highlights the feasibility of a novel computational paradigm for spiking neural circuits with plastic synaptic dynamics: Rather than being determined by the fixed number of afferents, the dimensionality of a neuron's decision space can be scaled flexibly through the number of input spikes emitted by its input layer.

Neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) encode the orientation and contrast of visual stimuli through changes in firing rate (Hubel and Wiesel, 1962). Their activity typically peaks at a preferred orientation and decays to zero at the orientations that are orthogonal to the preferred. This activity pattern is re-scaled by contrast but its shape is preserved, a phenomenon known as contrast invariance. Contrast-invariant selectivity is also observed at the population level in V1 (Carandini and Sengpiel, 2004). The mechanisms supporting the emergence of contrast-invariance at the population level remain unclear. How does the activity of different neurons with diverse orientation selectivity and non-linear contrast sensitivity combine to give rise to contrast-invariant population selectivity? Theoretical studies have shown that in the balance limit, the properties of single-neurons do not determine the population activity (van Vreeswijk and Sompolinsky, 1996). Instead, the synaptic dynamics (Mongillo et al., 2012) as well as the intracortical connectivity (Rosenbaum and Doiron, 2014) shape the population activity in balanced networks. We report that short-term plasticity can change the synaptic strength between neurons as a function of the presynaptic activity, which in turns modifies the population response to a stimulus. Thus, the same circuit can process a stimulus in different ways –linearly, sublinearly, supralinearly – depending on the properties of the synapses. We found that balanced networks with excitatory to excitatory short-term synaptic plasticity cannot be contrast-invariant. Instead, short-term plasticity modifies the network selectivity such that the tuning curves are narrower (broader) for increasing contrast if synapses are facilitating (depressing). Based on these results, we wondered whether balanced networks with plastic synapses (other than short-term) can support the emergence of contrast-invariant selectivity. Mathematically, we found that the only synaptic transformation that supports perfect contrast invariance in balanced networks is a power-law release of neurotransmitter as a function of the presynaptic firing rate (in the excitatory to excitatory and in the excitatory to inhibitory neurons). We validate this finding using spiking network simulations, where we report contrast-invariant tuning curves when synapses release the neurotransmitter following a power- law function of the presynaptic firing rate. In summary, we show that synaptic plasticity controls the type of non-linear network response to stimulus contrast and that it can be a potential mechanism mediating the emergence of contrast invariance in balanced networks with orientation-dependent connectivity. Our results therefore connect the physiology of individual synapses to the network level and may help understand the establishment of contrast-invariant selectivity.

Synaptic plasticity is believed to be a key physiological mechanism for learning. It is well-established that it depends on pre and postsynaptic activity. However, models that rely solely on pre and postsynaptic activity for synaptic changes have, to date, not been able to account for learning complex tasks that demand hierarchical networks. Here, we show that if synaptic plasticity is regulated by high-frequency bursts of spikes, then neurons higher in the hierarchy can coordinate the plasticity of lower-level connections. Using simulations and mathematical analyses, we demonstrate that, when paired with short-term synaptic dynamics, regenerative activity in the apical dendrites, and synaptic plasticity in feedback pathways, a burst-dependent learning rule can solve challenging tasks that require deep network architectures. Our results demonstrate that well-known properties of dendrites, synapses, and synaptic plasticity are sufficient to enable sophisticated learning in hierarchical circuits.

Synaptic plasticity is believed to be a key physiological mechanism for learning. It is well-established that it depends on pre and postsynaptic activity. However, models that rely solely on pre and postsynaptic activity for synaptic changes have, to date, not been able to account for learning complex tasks that demand hierarchical networks. Here, we show that if synaptic plasticity is regulated by high-frequency bursts of spikes, then neurons higher in the hierarchy can coordinate the plasticity of lower-level connections. Using simulations and mathematical analyses, we demonstrate that, when paired with short-term synaptic dynamics, regenerative activity in the apical dendrites, and synaptic plasticity in feedback pathways, a burst-dependent learning rule can solve challenging tasks that require deep network architectures. Our results demonstrate that well-known properties of dendrites, synapses, and synaptic plasticity are sufficient to enable sophisticated learning in hierarchical circuits.