Biological materials gain complexity from the programmable nature of their components. To manufacture materials with comparable complexity synthetically, we need to create building blocks with low crosstalk so that they only bind to their desired partners. Canonically, these building blocks are made using DNA strands or proteins to achieve specificity. Here we propose a new materials platform, termed Magnetic Handshake Materials, in which we program interactions through designing magnetic dipole patterns. This is a completely synthetic platform, enabled by magnetic printing technology, which is easier to both model theoretically and control experimentally. In this seminar, I will give an overview of the development of the Magnetic Handshake Materials platform, ranging from interaction, assembly to function design.

Living organisms have mastered the dynamic control of stresses within sheets to induce shape transformation and locomotion. For instance, the spatiotemporal pattern of action potential in a heart yields a dynamical stress field leading to shape changes and biological function. Such structures inspired the development of theoretical tools and responsive materials alike. Yet, present attempts to mimic their rich dynamics and phenomenology in autonomous synthetic matter are still very limited. In this talk, I will present several complementing innovations toward this goal: novel shaping mechanisms that were overlooked by previous research, new fabrication techniques for programmable matter via 4D printing of gel structures, and most prominently, the first autonomous shape morphing membranes. The dynamical control over the geometry of the material is a prevalent theme in all of these achievements. In particular, the latter system demonstrates localized deformations, induced by a pattern-forming chemical reaction, that prescribe the patterns of curvature, leading to global shape evolution. Together, these developments present a route for modeling and producing fully autonomous soft membranes mimicking some of the locomotive capabilities of living organisms.

Active matter describes a class of systems that are maintained far from equilibrium by driving forces acting on the constituent particles. Here I will focus on confined active nematics, which exhibit especially rich flow behavior, ranging from structured patterns in space and time to disordered turbulent flows. To understand this behavior, I will take a deterministic dynamical systems approach, beginning with the hydrodynamic equations for the active nematic. This approach reveals that the infinite-dimensional phase space of all possible flow configurations is populated by Exact Coherent Structures (ECS), which are exact solutions of the hydrodynamic equations with distinct and regular spatiotemporal structure; examples include unstable equilibria, periodic orbits, and traveling waves. The ECS are connected by dynamical pathways called invariant manifolds. The main hypothesis in this approach is that turbulence corresponds to a trajectory meandering in the phase space, transitioning between ECS by traveling on the invariant manifolds. Similar approaches have been successful in characterizing high Reynolds number turbulence of passive fluids. Here, I will present the first systematic study of active nematic ECS and their invariant manifolds and discuss their role in characterizing the phenomenon of active turbulence.

The richness of active matter's spatiotemporal patterns continues to capture our imagination. Shaping these emergent dynamics into pre-determined forms of our choosing is a grand challenge in the field. To complicate matters, multiple dynamical attractors can coexist in such systems, leading to initial condition-dependent dynamics. Consequently, non-trivial spatiotemporal inputs are generally needed to access these states. Optimal control theory provides a general framework for identifying such inputs and represents a promising computational tool for guiding experiments and interacting with various systems in soft active matter and biology. As an exemplar, I first consider an extensile active nematic fluid confined to a disk. In the absence of control, the system produces two topological defects that perpetually circulate. Optimal control identifies a time-varying active stress field that restructures the director field, flipping the system to its other attractor that rotates in the opposite direction. As a second, analogous case, I examine a small network of coupled Belousov-Zhabotinsky chemical oscillators that possesses two dominant attractors, two wave states of opposing chirality. Optimal control similarly achieves the task of attractor switching. I conclude with a few forward-looking remarks on how the same model-based control approach might come to bear on problems in biology.

A major unresolved question in microbiome research is whether the complex ecological patterns observed in surveys of natural communities can be explained and predicted by fundamental, quantitative principles. Bridging theory and experiment is hampered by the multiplicity of ecological processes that simultaneously affect community assembly and a lack of theoretical tools for modeling diverse ecosystems. Here, I will present a simple ecological model of microbial communities that reproduces large-scale ecological patterns observed across multiple natural and experimental settings including compositional gradients, clustering by environment, diversity/harshness correlations, and nestedness. Surprisingly, our model works despite having a “random metabolisms” and “random consumer preferences”. This raises the natural of question of why random ecosystems can describe real-world experimental data. In the second, more theoretical part of the talk, I will answer this question by showing that when a community becomes diverse enough, it will always self-organize into a stable state whose properties are well captured by a “typical random ecosystems”.

Tissue folding is a ubiquitous shape change event during development whereby a cell sheet bends into a curved 3D structure. This mechanical process is remarkably robust, and the correct final form is almost always achieved despite internal fluctuations and external perturbations inherent in living systems. While many genetic and molecular strategies that lead to robust development have been established, much less is known about how mechanical patterns and movements are ensured at the population level. I will describe how quantitative imaging, physical modeling and concepts from network science can uncover collective interactions that govern tissue patterning and shape change. Actin and myosin are two important cytoskeletal proteins involved in the force generation and movement of cells. Both parts of this talk will be about the spontaneous organization of actomyosin networks and their role in collective tissue dynamics. First, I will present how out-of-plane curvature can trigger the global alignment of actin fibers and a novel transition from collective to individual cell migration in culture. I will then describe how tissue-scale cytoskeletal patterns can guide tissue folding in the early fruit fly embryo. I will show that actin and myosin organize into a network that spans a domain of the embryo that will fold. Redundancy in this supracellular network encodes the tissue’s intrinsic robustness to mechanical and molecular perturbations during folding.

Chromosomes are extremely long, active polymers that are spatially organized across multiple scales to promote cellular functions, such as gene transcription and genetic inheritance. During each cell cycle, chromosomes are dramatically compacted as cells divide and dynamically reorganized into less compact, spatiotemporally patterned structures after cell division. These activities are facilitated by DNA/chromatin-binding protein motors called SMC complexes. Each of these motors can perform a unique activity known as “loop extrusion,” in which the motor binds the DNA/chromatin polymer, reels in the polymer fiber, and extrudes it as a loop. Using simulations and theory, I show how loop-extruding motors can collectively compact and spatially organize chromosomes in different scenarios. First, I show that loop-extruding complexes can generate sufficient compaction for cell division, provided that loop-extrusion satisfies stringent physical requirements. Second, while loop-extrusion alone does not uniquely spatially pattern the genome, interactions between SMC complexes and protein “boundary elements” can generate patterns that emerge in the genome after cell division. Intriguingly, these “boundary elements” are not necessarily stationary, which can generate a variety of patterns in the neighborhood of transcriptionally active genes. These predictions, along with supporting experiments, show how SMC complexes and other molecular machinery, such as RNA polymerase, can spatially organize the genome. More generally, this work demonstrates both the versatility of the loop extrusion mechanism for chromosome functional organization and how seemingly subtle microscopic effects can emerge in the spatiotemporal structure of nonequilibrium polymers.

It is sometimes said that there are two reasons why physics is so successful as a science. One is that it deals with very simple problems. The other is that it attempts to account only for universal aspects of systems at a desired level of description, with lower level phenomena subsumed into a small number of adjustable parameters. It is a widespread belief that this approach seems unlikely to be useful in biology, which is intimidatingly complex, where “everything has an exception”, and where there are a huge number of undetermined parameters. I will try to argue, nonetheless, that there are important, experimentally-testable aspects of biology that exhibit universality, and should be amenable to being tackled from a physics perspective. My suggestion is that this can lead to useful new insights into the existence and universal characteristics of living systems. I will try to justify this point of view by contrasting the goals and practices of the field of condensed matter physics with materials science, and then by extension, the goals and practices of the newly emerging field of “Physics of Living Systems” with biology. Specific biological examples that I will discuss include the following: Universal patterns of gene expression in cell biology Universal scaling laws in ecosystems, including the species-area law, Kleiber’s law, Paradox of the Plankton Universality of the genetic code Universality of thermodynamic utilization in microbial communities Universal scaling laws in the tree of life The question of what can be learned from studying universal phenomena in biology will also be discussed. Universal phenomena, by their very nature, shed little light on detailed microscopic levels of description. Yet there is no point in seeking idiosyncratic mechanistic explanations for phenomena whose explanation is found in rather general principles, such as the central limit theorem, that every microscopic mechanism is constrained to obey. Thus, physical perspectives may be better suited to answering certain questions such as universality than traditional biological perspectives. Concomitantly, it must be recognized that the identification and understanding of universal phenomena may not be a good answer to questions that have traditionally occupied biological scientists. Lastly, I plan to talk about what is perhaps the central question of universality in biology: why does the phenomenon of life occur at all? Is it an inevitable consequence of the laws of physics or some special geochemical accident? What methodology could even begin to answer this question? I will try to explain why traditional approaches to biology do not aim to answer this question, by comparing with our understanding of superconductivity as a physical phenomenon, and with the theory of universal computation. References Nigel Goldenfeld, Tommaso Biancalani, Farshid Jafarpour. Universal biology and the statistical mechanics of early life. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160341 (14 pages) (2017). Nigel Goldenfeld and Carl R. Woese. Life is Physics: evolution as a collective phenomenon far from equilibrium. Ann. Rev. Cond. Matt. Phys. 2, 375-399 (2011).

Membrane interfaces formed at junctions between cells are often associated with characteristic patterns of membrane protein organization, such as in epithelial tissues and between cells of the immune system. While this organization can be influenced by receptor clustering, lipid domain formation, and cytoskeletal dynamics, this talk will describe how cell surface molecular height can directly contribute to the spatial arrangement of membrane proteins and downstream signaling. Using a new optical method for characterizing molecular height, together with experiments using giant vesicles in vitro systems and live immune cells, we are investigating how cell surface molecular heights can be key contributors to cell-cell communication.

Microbes make up the vast majority of the tree of life. While we know very little about most microbial species, large-scale sequencing is giving us glimpses of the diversity that exists both within species and in ecosystems. The challenge now is to find the patterns in this diversity and understand them. This session features provocative talks on attempts to meet that challenge.

The Ca2+ modulated pulsatile secretions of glucagon and insulin by pancreatic α and β cells play a key role in glucose metabolism and homeostasis. However, how different types of cells in the islet couple and coordinate to give rise to various Ca2+ oscillation patterns and how these patterns are being tuned by paracrine regulation are still elusive. Here we developed a microfluidic device to facilitate long-term recording of islet Ca2+ activity at single cell level and found that islets show heterogeneous but intrinsic oscillation patterns. The α and β cells in an islet oscillate in antiphase and are globally phase locked to display a variety of oscillation modes. A mathematical model of islet oscillation maps out the dependence of the oscillation modes on the paracrine interactions between α and β cells. Our study reveals the origin of the islet oscillation patterns and highlights the role of paracrine regulation in tuning them.