ePoster

DECODING OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: EMOTIONAL VALENCE, CORTICAL TOPOGRAPHY, AND MOTOR INTEGRITY

Diego Israel Villeda Ariasand 4 co-authors

National Autonomous University of Mexico

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain
Board PS04-08PM-448

Presentation

Date TBA

Board: PS04-08PM-448

Poster preview

DECODING OF FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: EMOTIONAL VALENCE, CORTICAL TOPOGRAPHY, AND MOTOR INTEGRITY poster preview

Event Information

Poster Board

PS04-08PM-448

Abstract

Objective: To characterize facial expressions using Deep Learning and Optogenetics to integrate and dissect the neurobiological flow of gustatory valence encoding, the functional organization of the premotor cortex, and the integrity of the peripheral motor pathway.
Methods: Three strategies were employed in C57BL/6 and Thy1-ChR2-YFP mice. Three protocols were performed:
1. Optogenetic mapping of the Anterolateral Motor Cortex (ALM).
2. Facial expression analysis during gustatory stimulation (30-35 μL) with sucrose (20%), denatonium (1 mM), and water.
3. Evaluation of facial paralysis (compression vs. transection) during spontaneous locomotion.
Encoding was performed using: DeepLabCut (kinematics), PCA (trajectories), FaceMap (SVD), and HOGs (prototype/classification).
Results: Stimulation in Thy1 mice showed significant motor responses compared to baseline (Wilcoxon, p<0.05), revealing a functional topography in ALM with zone-dependent latencies (1.03s nasal vs 4s lateral). In C57BL/6, the tools discriminate
d against valence: HOGs differentiated the pleasure pattern (sucrose) from the aversion pattern (ANOVA, p<0.001; Tukey, p<0.001). Kinematics (DeepLabCut) demonstrated that said valence manifests through specific vertical changes in mouth and eyes (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.01), a finding corroborated by PCA, where the second component (PC2) exclusively isolated valence (p<0.01). Finally, under paralysis conditions, automated quantification detected significant alterations in whisker kinematics (p<0.05 vs control), validating the model's sensitivity to motor deficits.
Conclusions: The analysis demonstrates that facial expression is not random but follows an ordered flow, integrating valence encoding and the topographic organization of the premotor cortex, converging into a stereotyped kinematic execution that depends on the integrity of the peripheral motor pathway.

Composite scientific figure divided into three panels demonstrating facial expression analysis in mice. Panel (a) displays a brain schematic and heatmaps showing functional topography in the ALM cortex. Panel (b) shows mouse faces with tracking dots and graphs illustrating kinematic differences between pleasure and aversion stimuli. Panel (c) depicts whisker tracking lines and a longitudinal line graph comparing motor recovery amplitude over 20 days among nerve compression, transection, and sham groups.

Recommended posters

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.