ePoster

Open
ENTROPY, SURPRISE AND THE HIPPOCAMPAL LONG AXIS public poster
QR unavailable

Share ePoster

Scan or copy the public World Wide URL.

ePoster

ENTROPY, SURPRISE AND THE HIPPOCAMPAL LONG AXIS

Marta Suárezand 7 co-authors

Technical University of Madrid

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain

Presenter and authors

Presenter

Marta Suárez

Technical University of Madrid

Co-authors

Darya Frank; Johannes Sarnthein; Lukas Imbach; Debora Ledergerber; Antonio Gil-Nagel Rein; Rafael Toledano; Bryan Strange

Abstract

Aims:

The hippocampus exhibits functional specialization along its long axis; however, it is not clear how this determines changes in activity and connectivity in relation to predictability and expectation violation. Methods: twenty-six patients with intracranial electrodes in the hippocampus (ten with two electrodes along its long axis) performed a visual task where stimulus statistics translated into trialwise measures of entropy and surprise. Results: The head-body boundary (MNIy -20 to -25) exhibited pronounced gamma suppression with pre-stimulus entropy, while post-stimulus surprise elicited gamma response in anterior and posterior regions, though greater and longer-lasting in posterior. Pre-stimulus entropy was associated to increased coherence between anterior and posterior electrodes in the ripple band (80 Hz), and to lagged co-occurrence of sharp-wave ripples (SWRs) in both electrodes, being significant for the 'posterior precedes anterior' direction. Permutation tests indicated that posterior-to-anterior co-occurrent SWRs were associated to a significant phase shift and time delay for frequencies 2, 3 and 6 Hz in the same direction, suggestive of a travelling wave. Within 500 ms from stimulus onset, surprise was associated to reduced anterior/posterior coherence in frequencies 2 - 20 Hz; partial directed coherence was reduced in the anterior to posterior direction, also with decreased PAC (anterior beta / posterior gamma coupling). Dynamic causal modelling indicated that surprise de-coupled anterior and posterior regions. Conclusions: Entropy and surprise drove modulatory changes along the long axis. Pre-stimulus entropy associated to travelling SWRs from posterior to anterior hippocampus, whereas surprise induced de-coupling of the posterior hippocampus from anterior low-frequency activity.
The figure shows different results related to entropy and surprise responses along the hippocampal long axis, measured by intracranial EEG. Pre-stimulus entropy is associated to gamma suppression in the head-body boundary, to increased connectivity along the long axis in the ripple frequency band, and to increased co-occurrence of sharp-wave ripples (SWRs) in posterior and anterior hippocampus, with posterior SWRs preceding anterior. This co-occurrence was associated to significant phase shift and time delay in the posterior to anterior direction, corresponding to frequencies 2, 3 and 6 Hz. Post-stimulus surprise was associated to gamma response in both anterior and posterior, but greater in posterior region. Surprise was associated to a significant reduction in partial directed coherence in the anterior to posterior direction involving the theta band. Dynamic causal modelling suggested that surprise de-coupled anterior and posterior hippocampus.

Keywords