ePoster

NIGRO-COLLICULAR PATHWAYS FOR APPETITIVE AND THREAT RESPONSES

Nuo Dongand 4 co-authors

Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)

FENS Forum 2026 (2026)
Barcelona, Spain
Board PS01-07AM-321

Presentation

Date TBA

Board: PS01-07AM-321

Poster preview

NIGRO-COLLICULAR PATHWAYS FOR APPETITIVE AND THREAT RESPONSES poster preview

Event Information

Poster Board

PS01-07AM-321

Abstract

Animals make decisions in response to environmental cues motivated by different internal states. In auditory-based decision making, the tail of striatum (TS) is involved in both reward seeking and threat avoidance behaviors, but the neural circuits mediating each of these behaviors remain unknown. To investigate the mechanisms by which the TS controls appetitive and threat responses, we developed two behavioral paradigms for mice. The first is a two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task (Fig. 1a), in which auditory or visual cues are presented in blocks (Fig. 1b), allowing the direct comparison of behavioral outcomes following circuit inhibition. We found that the TS is required for executing auditory-guided, but not visually-guided choices (Fig. 1c). Modeling of the 2AFC task reveals that animals exhibit distinct behavioral states that they differentially occupy across modalities (Fig. 1d,e). The second paradigm is an escape task (Fig. 1f), in which animals display distinct fear-related behaviors, including freezing and escaping (Fig. 1g). Across days, animals learn to suppress their escapes (Fig. 1h). In ongoing experiments we are generating a brain-wide activity map using cfos staining and light-sheet imaging to reveal the brain areas specifically active in auditory-guided decisions. To causally investigate the relevant circuits downstream the TS, we are employing chemogenetic approaches to manipulate nigro-collicular (Fig. 1i) projections across both behavioral paradigms. This will allow us to understand if there is a dissociation in basal ganglia output pathways by which the TS controls these core behaviors, and to examine how different motivational contexts shape auditory-driven decision making.


Fig. 1: Behavior paradigms and circuit characterization. a Schematic diagram of the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task. Subjects choose the correct side to obtain a water reward based on either visual or auditory stimuli. b Example performance from a multimodal session with trials of different behavioral modalities indicated by color. c Performance comparison between auditory- and visual-guided sessions in the 2AFC task following injection of muscimol (purple) or saline (gray) into the tail of the striatum (TS). d Psychometric curves across three behavioral states identified by a GLM-HMM model. e Proportions of visual and auditory trials across the different behavioral states shown in d. f Schematic diagram of the escape paradigm. Animals trigger a ramping sound (illustrated in inset) upon entering the sound-trigger zone. g Example trajectories showing changes in speed when the sound is triggered (inferno) or not (viridis). Trial starts are indicated by black dots and trial ends by white dots. h Distance traveled along the x-axis of the arena, comparing conditions with sound (red) and without sound (green) across three consecutive days. i Three sections showing the bottom-up (right hemisphere) and top-down (left hemisphere) inputs to IC. Different colors indicate distinct sources: cochlear nucleus (red), superior olivary complex (magenta), lateral lemniscus (cyan), primary auditory cortex (green), and SNr (yellow).

Recommended posters

Cookies

We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.