Optogenetics seminars

In understanding circuit operations, a key issue is the extent to which neuronal spiking reflects local computation or responses to upstream inputs. Because pyramidal cells in CA1 do not have local recurrent projections, it is currently assumed that firing in CA1 is inherited from its inputs – thus, entorhinal inputs provide communication with the rest of the neocortex and the outside world, whereas CA3 inputs provide internal and past memory representations. Several studies have attempted to prove this hypothesis, by lesioning or silencing either area CA3 or the entorhinal cortex and examining the effect of firing on CA1 pyramidal cells. Despite the intense and careful work in this research area, the magnitudes and types of the reported physiological impairments vary widely across experiments. At least part of the existing variability and conflicts is due to the different behavioral paradigms, designs and evaluation methods used by different investigators. Simultaneous manipulations in the same animal or even separate manipulations of the different inputs to the hippocampal circuits in the same experiment are rare. To address these issues, I used optogenetic silencing of unilateral and bilateral mEC, of the local CA1 region, and performed bilateral pharmacogenetic silencing of the entire CA3 region. I combined this with high spatial resolution recording of local field potentials (LFP) in the CA1-dentate axis and simultaneously collected firing pattern data from thousands of single neurons. Each experimental animal had up to two of these manipulations being performed simultaneously. Silencing the medial entorhinal (mEC) largely abolished extracellular theta and gamma currents in CA1, without affecting firing rates. In contrast, CA3 and local CA1 silencing strongly decreased firing of CA1 neurons without affecting theta currents. Each perturbation reconfigured the CA1 spatial map. Yet, the ability of the CA1 circuit to support place field activity persisted, maintaining the same fraction of spatially tuned place fields, and reliable assembly expression as in the intact mouse. Thus, the CA1 network can maintain autonomous computation to support coordinated place cell assemblies without reliance on its inputs, yet these inputs can effectively reconfigure and assist in maintaining stability of the CA1 map.

Coping with threatening situations requires both identifying stimuli predicting danger and selecting adaptive behavioral responses in order to survive. The dorso medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) is a critical structure involved in the regulation of threat-related behaviour, yet it is still largely unclear how threat-predicting stimuli and defensive behaviours are associated within prefrontal networks in order to successfully drive adaptive responses. Over the past years, we used a combination we used a combination of extracellular recordings, neuronal decoding approaches, and state of the art optogenetic manipulations to identify key neuronal elements and mechanisms controlling defensive fear responses. I will present an overview of our recent work ranging from analyses of dedicated neuronal types and oscillatory and synchronization mechanisms to artificial intelligence approaches used to decode the activity or large population of neurons. Ultimately these analyses allowed the identification of high dimensional representations of defensive behavior unfolding within prefrontal networks.

Inter-areal coherence between cortical field-potentials is a widespread phenomenon and depends on numerous behavioral and cognitive factors. It has been hypothesized that inter-areal coherence reflects phase-synchronization between local oscillations and flexibly gates communication. We reveal an alternative mechanism, where coherence results from and is not the cause of communication, and naturally emerges as a consequence of the fact that spiking activity in a sending area causes post-synaptic inputs both in the same area and in other areas. Consequently, coherence depends in a lawful manner on oscillatory power and phase-locking in a sending area and inter-areal connectivity. We show that changes in oscillatory power explain prominent changes in fronto-parietal beta-coherence with movement and memory, and LGN-V1 gamma-coherence with arousal and visual stimulation. Optogenetic silencing of a receiving area and E/I network simulations demonstrate that afferent synaptic inputs rather than spiking entrainment are the main determinant of inter-areal coherence. These findings suggest that the unique spectral profiles of different brain areas automatically give rise to large-scale inter-areal coherence patterns that follow anatomical connectivity and continuously reconfigure as a function of behavior and cognition.

The ability to reach, grasp, and manipulate objects is a remarkable expression of motor skill, and the loss of this ability in injury, stroke, or disease can be devastating. These behaviors are controlled by the coordinated activity of tens of millions of neurons distributed across many CNS regions, including the primary motor cortex. While many studies have characterized the activity of single cortical neurons during reaching, the principles governing the dynamics of large, distributed neural populations remain largely unknown. Recent work in primates has suggested that during the execution of reaching, motor cortex may autonomously generate the neural pattern controlling the movement, much like the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion. In this seminar, I will describe recent work that tests this hypothesis using large-scale neural recording, high-resolution behavioral measurements, dynamical systems approaches to data analysis, and optogenetic perturbations in mice. We find, by contrast, that motor cortex requires strong, continuous, and time-varying thalamic input to generate the neural pattern driving reaching. In a second line of work, we demonstrate that the cortico-cerebellar loop is not critical for driving the arm towards the target, but instead fine-tunes movement parameters to enable precise and accurate behavior. Finally, I will describe my future plans to apply these experimental and analytical approaches to the adaptive control of locomotion in complex environments.

Coping with threatening situations requires both identifying stimuli predicting danger and selecting adaptive behavioral responses in order to survive. The dorso medial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) is a critical structure involved in the regulation of threat-related behaviour, yet it is still largely unclear how threat-predicting stimuli and defensive behaviours are associated within prefrontal networks in order to successfully drive adaptive responses. To address these questions, we used a combination of extracellular recordings, neuronal decoding approaches, and optogenetic manipulations to show that threat representations and the initiation of avoidance behaviour are dynamically encoded in the overall population activity of dmPFC neurons. These data indicate that although dmPFC population activity at stimulus onset encodes sustained threat representations and discriminates threat- from non-threat cues, it does not predict action outcome. In contrast, transient dmPFC population activity prior to action initiation reliably predicts avoided from non-avoided trials. Accordingly, optogenetic inhibition of prefrontal activity critically constrained the selection of adaptive defensive responses in a time-dependent manner. These results reveal that the adaptive selection of active fear responses relies on a dynamic process of information linking threats with defensive actions unfolding within prefrontal networks.

Neural codes, such as temporal codes (precisely timed spikes) and rate codes (instantaneous spike firing rates), are believed to be used in encoding sensory information into spike trains of cortical neurons. Temporal and rate codes co-exist in the spike train and such multiplexed neural code-carrying spike trains have been shown to be spatially synchronized in multiple neurons across different cortical layers during sensory information processing. Inhibition is suggested to promote such synchronization, but it is unclear whether distinct subtypes of interneurons make different contributions in the synchronization of multiplexed neural codes. To test this, in vivo single-unit recordings from barrel cortex were combined with optogenetic manipulations to determine the contributions of parvalbumin (PV)- and somatostatin (SST)-positive interneurons to synchronization of precisely timed spike sequences. We found that PV interneurons preferentially promote the synchronization of spike times when instantaneous firing rates are low (<12 Hz), whereas SST interneurons preferentially promote the synchronization of spike times when instantaneous firing rates are high (>12 Hz). Furthermore, using a computational model, we demonstrate that these effects can be explained by PV and SST interneurons having preferential contribution to feedforward and feedback inhibition, respectively. Overall, these results show that PV and SST interneurons have distinct frequency (rate code)-selective roles in dynamically gating the synchronization of spike times (temporal code) through preferentially recruiting feedforward and feedback inhibitory circuit motifs. The inhibitory neural circuit mechanisms we uncovered here his may have critical roles in regulating neural code-based somatosensory information processing in the neocortex.

Olfactory navigation provides a tractable model for studying the circuit basis of sensori-motor transformations and goal-directed behaviour. Macroscopic organisms typically navigate in odor plumes that provide a noisy and uncertain signal about the location of an odor source. Work in many species has suggested that animals accomplish this task by combining temporal processing of dynamic odor information with an estimate of wind direction. Our lab has been using adult walking Drosophila to understand both the computational algorithms and the neural circuits that support navigation in a plume of attractive food odor. We developed a high-throughput paradigm to study behavioural responses to temporally-controlled odor and wind stimuli. Using this paradigm we found that flies respond to a food odor (apple cider vinegar) with two behaviours: during the odor they run upwind, while after odor loss they perform a local search. A simple computational model based one these two responses is sufficient to replicate many aspects of fly behaviour in a natural turbulent plume. In on-going work, we are seeking to identify the neural circuits and biophysical mechanisms that perform the computations delineated by our model. Using electrophysiology, we have identified mechanosensory neurons that compute wind direction from movements of the two antennae and central mechanosensory neurons that encode wind direction are are involved in generating a stable downwind orientation. Using optogenetic activation, we have traced olfactory circuits capable of evoking upwind orientation and offset search from the periphery, through the mushroom body and lateral horn, to the central complex. Finally, we have used optogenetic activation, in combination with molecular manipulation of specific synapses, to localize temporal computations performed on the odor signal to olfactory transduction and transmission at specific synapses. Our work illustrates how the tools available in fruit fly can be applied to dissect the mechanisms underlying a complex goal-directed behaviour.