Optogenetics seminars

Embryos issue instructions to their cells in the form of patterns of signaling activity. Within these patterns, the distribution of signaling in time and space directs the fate of embryonic cells. Tools to perturb developmental signaling with high resolution in space and time can help reveal how these patterns are decoded to make appropriate fate decisions. In this talk, I will present new optogenetic reagents and an experimental pipeline for creating designer Nodal signaling patterns in live zebrafish embryos. Our improved optoNodal reagents eliminate dark activity and improve response kinetics, without sacrificing dynamic range. We adapted an ultra-widefield microscopy platform for parallel light patterning in up to 36 embryos and demonstrated precise spatial control over Nodal signaling activity and downstream gene expression. Using this system, we demonstrate that patterned Nodal activation can initiate specification and internalization movements of endodermal precursors. Further, we used patterned illumination to generate synthetic signaling patterns in Nodal signaling mutants, rescuing several characteristic developmental defects. This study establishes an experimental toolkit for systematic exploration of Nodal signaling patterns in live embryos.

Three complementary lectures explain the development and applications of optogenetics. Gero Miesenböck traces optical control of neuronal activity from early experiments to studies of sleep, including neurons that respond to accumulated sleep need and molecular mechanisms governing sleep pressure. Peter Hegemann connects microbial photobiology to channelrhodopsins that control neuronal membrane voltage. He discusses their use in studying development and learning, and prospects for extending optical control to enzymes, transcription and translation. Georg Nagel follows the discovery and expression of microbial rhodopsins with light-sensitive transport and enzymatic functions. His examples include Channelrhodopsin-2 and its H134R variant, halorhodopsin, the more light-sensitive ChR2/XXL, the rhodopsin guanylyl cyclase Cyclop, and anion-channelrhodopsins in tobacco plants. Together, the talks connect molecular mechanisms with experimental control of neural and plant systems.

Broadly, the Mauro Costa-Mattioli laboratory (The MCM Lab) encompasses two complementary lines of research. The first one, more traditional but very important, aims at unraveling the molecular mechanisms underlying memory formation (e.g., using state-of-the-art molecular and cell-specific genetic approaches). Learning and memory disorders can strike the brain during development (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorders and Down Syndrome), as well as during adulthood (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease). We are interested in understanding the specific circuits and molecular pathways that are primarily targeted in these disorders and how they can be restored. To tackle these questions, we use a multidisciplinary, convergent and cross-species approach that combines mouse and fly genetics, molecular biology, electrophysiology, stem cell biology, optogenetics and behavioral techniques. The second line of research, more recent and relatively unexplored, is focused on understanding how gut microbes control CNS driven-behavior and brain function. Our recent discoveries, that microbes in the gut could modulate brain function and behavior in a very powerful way, have added a whole new dimension to the classic view of how complex behaviors are controlled. The unexpected findings have opened new avenues of study for us and are currently driving my lab to answer a host of new and very interesting questions: - What are the gut microbes (and metabolites) that regulate CNS-driven behaviors? Would it be possible to develop an unbiased screening method to identify specific microbes that regulate different behaviors? - If this is the case, can we identify how members of the gut microbiome (and their metabolites) mechanistically influence brain function? - What is the communication channel between the gut microbiota and the brain? Do different gut microbes use different ways to interact with the brain? - Could disruption of the gut microbial ecology cause neurodevelopmental dysfunction? If so, what is the impact of disruption in young and adult animals? - More importantly, could specific restoration of selected bacterial strains (new generation probiotics) represent a novel therapeutic approach for the targeted treatment of neurodevelopmental disorders? - Finally, can we develop microbiota-directed therapeutic foods to repair brain dysfunction in a variety of neurological disorders?

In 1676, using candle light and a small glass sphere as the lens, van Leeuwenhoek discovered the microscopic world of living microorganisms. Today, using lasers, spatial light modulators, digital cameras and computers, we study the statistical and fluid mechanics of microswimmers in ways that were unimaginable only 50 years ago. With light we can image swimming bacteria in 3D, apply controllable force fields or sculpt their 3D environment. In addition to shaping the physical world outside cells we can use light to control the internal state of genetically modified bacteria. I will review our recent work with light-bacteria interactions, going from some fundamental problems in the fluid and statistical mechanics of microswimmers to the use of bacteria as propellers for micro-machines or as a "living" paint controlled by light.

My lab studies the design principles of cytoskeletal materials the drive cellular morphogenesis, with a focus on contractile machinery in adherent cells. In addition to force generation, a key feature of these materials are distributed force sensors which allow for rapid assembly, adaptation, repair and disintegration. Here I will describe how optogenetic control of RhoA GTPase is a powerful and versatile force spectroscopy approach of cytoskeletal assemblies and its recent use to probe repair response in actomyosin stress fibers. I will also describe our recent identification of 18 proteins from the zyxin, paxillin, Tes and Enigma families with mechanosensitive LIM (Lin11, Isl- 1 & Mec-3) domains that bind exclusively to mechanically stressed actin filaments. Our results suggest that the evolutionary emergence of contractile F-actin machinery coincided with, or required, proteins that could report on the stresses present there to maintain homeostasis of actively stressed networks.

The vagus nerve contains a diversity of sensory neurons that detect peripheral stimuli such as blood pressure changes at the aortic arch, lung expansion during breathing, meal-induced stomach distension, and chemotherapeutics that induce nausea. Underlying vagal sensory mechanisms are largely unresolved at a molecular level, presenting tremendously important problems in sensory biology. We charted vagal sensory neurons by single cell RNA sequencing, identifying novel cell surface receptors and classifying a staggering diversity of sensory neuron types. We then generated a collection of ires-Cre knock-in mice to target each neuron type, and adapted genetic tools for Cre-based anatomical mapping, in vivo imaging, targeted ablation, and optogenetic control of vagal neuron activity. We found different sensory neuron types that innervate the lung and exert powerful effects on breathing, others that monitor and control the digestive system, and yet others that innervate that innervate the larynx and protect the airways. Together with Ardem Patapoutian, we also identified a critical role for Piezo mechanoreceptors in the sensation of airway stretch, which underlies a classical respiratory reflex termed the Hering-Breuer inspiratory reflex, as well as in the neuronal sensation of blood pressure and the baroreceptor reflex.

Understanding how neural circuits in the brain compute information not only requires determining how individual inhibitory and excitatory elements of circuits are wired together, but also a detailed knowledge of their functional interactions. Recent advances in optogenetic techniques and mouse genetics now offer ways to specifically probe the functional properties of neural circuits with unprecedented specificity. Perhaps one of the most heavily interrogated circuits in the mouse brain is one in the retina that is involved in coding direction (reviewed by Mauss et al., 2017; Vaney et al., 2012). In this circuit, direction is encoded by specialized direction-selective (DS) ganglion cells (DSGCs), which respond robustly to objects moving in a ‘preferred’ direction but not in the opposite or ‘null’ direction (Barlow and Levick, 1965). We now know this computation relies on the coordination of three transmitter systems: glutamate, GABA and acetylcholine (ACh). In this talk, I will discuss the synaptic mechanisms that produce the spatiotemporal patterns of inhibition and excitation that are crucial for shaping directional selectivity. Special emphasis will be placed on the role of ACh, as it is unclear whether it is mediated by synaptic or non-synaptic mechanisms, which is in fact a central issue in the CNS. Barlow, H.B., and Levick, W.R. (1965). The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. J Physiol 178, 477-504. Mauss, A.S., Vlasits, A., Borst, A., and Feller, M. (2017). Visual Circuits for Direction Selectivity. Annu Rev Neurosci 40, 211-230. Vaney, D.I., Sivyer, B., and Taylor, W.R. (2012). Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nat Rev Neurosci 13, 194-208