Cookies
We use essential cookies to run the site. Analytics cookies are optional and help us improve World Wide. Learn more.
ICNS Hamburg
Showing your local timezone
Schedule
Wednesday, July 6, 2022
5:30 PM Europe/Berlin
Recording provided by the organiser.
Domain
NeuroscienceHost
SNUFA
Duration
30 minutes
Which nodes in a brain network causally influence one another, and how do such interactions utilize the underlying structural connectivity? One of the fundamental goals of neuroscience is to pinpoint such causal relations. Conventionally, these relationships are established by manipulating a node while tracking changes in another node. A causal role is then assigned to the first node if this intervention led to a significant change in the state of the tracked node. In this presentation, I use a series of intuitive thought experiments to demonstrate the methodological shortcomings of the current ‘causation via manipulation’ framework. Namely, a node might causally influence another node, but how much and through which mechanistic interactions? Therefore, establishing a causal relationship, however reliable, does not provide the proper causal understanding of the system, because there often exists a wide range of causal influences that require to be adequately decomposed. To do so, I introduce a game-theoretical framework called Multi-perturbation Shapley value Analysis (MSA). Then, I present our work in which we employed MSA on an Echo State Network (ESN), quantified how much its nodes were influencing each other, and compared these measures with the underlying synaptic strength. We found that: 1. Even though the network itself was sparse, every node could causally influence other nodes. In this case, a mere elucidation of causal relationships did not provide any useful information. 2. Additionally, the full knowledge of the structural connectome did not provide a complete causal picture of the system either, since nodes frequently influenced each other indirectly, that is, via other intermediate nodes. Our results show that just elucidating causal contributions in complex networks such as the brain is not sufficient to draw mechanistic conclusions. Moreover, quantifying causal interactions requires a systematic and extensive manipulation framework. The framework put forward here benefits from employing neural network models, and in turn, provides explainability for them.
Kayson Fakhar
ICNS Hamburg
Contact & Resources
neuro
Nervous system function relies on the polarized architecture of neurons, established by directional transport of pre- and postsynaptic cargoes. While delivery of postsynaptic components depends on the
neuro
A combinatorial neural code for long-term motor memory
neuro
The postdoctoral researcher will work on an interdisciplinary project at the intersection of deep learning and comparative politics. The candidate will work in the Human-Centered Machine Learning (HuM
We are looking for highly motivated researchers to join our group in interdisciplinary projects that focus on the development of computational models to understand how linguistic information is repres
The CSNG Lab at the Faculty of Mathematics and Physics at the Charles University is seeking a highly motivated Postdoctoral Researcher to join our team to work on a digital twin model of the visual sy
PROJECT SUMMARY / ABSTRACT Cluster headache (CH), which affects about 1 in 1,000 people, is a severe and debilitating primary headache disorder characterized by repeated attacks occurring in clusters