1 h
A Game Theoretical Framework for Quantifying Causes in Neural Networks
Computational Neuroscience, Game Theory, Neuroscience and seminar by Kayson Fakhar, ICNS Hamburg
Hosted by SNUFA
Wednesday 17:30–18:00 Berlin (GMT+2)
Recording available
Recording
Abstract
Which nodes in a brain network causally influence one another, and how do such interactions utilize the underlying structural connectivity? One of the fundamental goals of neuroscience is to pinpoint such causal relations. Conventionally, these relationships are established by manipulating a node while tracking changes in another node. A causal role is then assigned to the first node if this intervention led to a significant change in the state of the tracked node. In this presentation, I use a series of intuitive thought experiments to demonstrate the methodological shortcomings of the current ‘causation via manipulation’ framework. Namely, a node might causally influence another node, but how much and through which mechanistic interactions? Therefore, establishing a causal relationship, however reliable, does not provide the proper causal understanding of the system, because there often exists a wide range of causal influences that require to be adequately decomposed. To do so, I introduce a game-theoretical framework called Multi-perturbation Shapley value Analysis (MSA). Then, I present our work in which we employed MSA on an Echo State Network (ESN), quantified how much its nodes were influencing each other, and compared these measures with the underlying synaptic strength. We found that:
1. Even though the network itself was sparse, every node could causally influence other nodes. In this case, a mere elucidation of causal relationships did not provide any useful information.
2. Additionally, the full knowledge of the structural connectome did not provide a complete causal picture of the system either, since nodes frequently influenced each other indirectly, that is, via other intermediate nodes.
Our results show that just elucidating causal contributions in complex networks such as the brain is not sufficient to draw mechanistic conclusions. Moreover, quantifying causal interactions requires a systematic and extensive manipulation framework. The framework put forward here benefits from employing neural network models, and in turn, provides explainability for them.
Topics
Related seminars
Characterizing the causal role of large-scale network interactions in supporting complex cognition
Video · 1 h 8 min · May 7, 2024Michal Ramot, Weizmann Inst. of ScienceGenerative models of brain function: Inference, networks, and mechanisms
Video · 48 min · Nov 26, 2021Adeel Razi, Monash University
More from SNUFA
All talksCrescent Loom: a flexible neurophysiology online simulation for teaching neuroethology
Apr 5, 2023Olive PerryExtracting computational mechanisms from neural data using low-rank RNNs
Jan 11, 2023Adrian Valente